or is this going to be a digital galileo where unpopular fact is pushed to the bottom..
Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!
Not sure what you mean. xfce is pretty simple and intuitive to use. It takes a minute or two in control panels and then gets out of your way. The interface conventions are easily toggled between various unix environments and microsoft ones as well.
Yes, but it's not progress if it destroys the more technical constructs that allow more knowledgeable people to be more productive. Replacing whole interfaces with a search box does just that.
Nah, you can do things with GUI that can't be done at a text prompt. The reverse is also true. I don't think your analogy applies.
BTW call a spade a spade. Equation Group == NSA TAO
Not really, it may have once been NSA but once the code was discovered it could be anyone using it. It just becomes another "tool" in the "public" toolbox.
Seagate is correct. Putting a hash on the website doesn't improve security at all because anyone who can change the download can also change the web page containing the hash.
The fact that this practice is widespread in the Linux world originates from the usage of insecure FTP mirrors run by volunteer admins. There it's possible for a mirror to get hacked independently of the origin web page. A company like Seagate doesn't rely on volunteers at universities to distribute their binaries so the technique is pointless.
A tool to verify the firmware is poetically impossible to write. What code on the drive would provide the firmware in response to a tool query? Oh right
BTW call a spade a spade. Equation Group == NSA TAO
Well, then that's their limitation, not mine. I am tired of this trend of dumbing things down to the lowest possible. In this case, it puts the search engine in control of who gets to find your site. Also, having sites memorized removes the search step from the process which is a net win for people who actually have brains.
The church might care if google decided to delist them, say for political reasons.
The issue with Silent Circle isn't their jurisdiction. It's that their code is of deeply questionable quality. They recently had a remote code execution exploit that could be triggered just by sending a text message to their phone. It's been literally years since one of these affected mainstream software stacks, so how was that possible?
Well, they wrote their own SMS parsing code, in C, and used JSON to wrap binary encrypted messages and there was a bug that could cause memory corruption when the JSON wasn't exactly in the form they expected.
The amount of fail in that sentence is just amazing. They're a company which justifies its entire existence with security, writing software to run on a smartphone where the OS itself is written in a memory safe language (Java) and yet they are parsing overly complex data structures off the wire
After learning about that exploit and more to the point, why it occurred, I will strongly recommend against using Silent Circle for anything. Nobody serious about security should be handling potentially malicious data structures in C, especially not when the rest of the text messaging app is written in Java. That's just crazy.
First off, the picture is crap. It's overexposed and the white balance is off by a mile. My 10 year old Razr flip phone took better pictures than that.
However, there's still a human perception factor going on. I had looked at the picture on my laptop, and it was clearly white and gold. Then later I pulled the exact same picture up on my iPhone to show it to someone, and it looked black and blue. I then concluded that the picture looked different on my laptop than my phone due to differences in the display. When I got back home I pulled the picture up on both my phone and laptop to do a direct comparison, and both, including on my phone, looked white and gold again.
So I think it depends on whether your eyes are currently adapted to dim indoor lighting or bright outdoor lighting, in addition to the backlight on your device also changing the hue depending on if it's automatically full bright for outdoors or dim for indoors.
But that's just where the usefulness ends. Sure, you now appreciate rock music, but can you play it in real life on real instruments?
Umm, yeah, and how many video game skills do you apply to daily life?
Are you an awesome assassin? A race car driver? A pilot? A marine? Are you actually Batman?
It's a frickin game. It is play. Nobody gives a crap in this context about playing an actual instrument. It's frickin air guitar. It's intended to be fun.
Millions of kids bought Guitar Hero and Rock Band to realize their dreams of actually becoming ROCK MUSICIANS.
Horseshit. Millions of kids bought GTA and Saints Row to realize their dreams of become thugs, mac daddies, and pimps.
Do you think any of them actually expect to have that happen? (Well, I guess in some cases the just might.)
Sadly, all the games do is to train you to press colored buttons in sequence with colored lights. Those skills are not transferable to real instruments, and in fact, won't even get you an audition.
Dude, in the 80s there used to be this game called Simon. It had four colored lights to press. You can still buy it.
This is shared fun, with "press colored buttons in sequence with colored lights" but with music and animations. It's not sophisticated or real. It's not for hardcore gamers.
Most 'skills' you practice in video games will never translate into real world skills or get you an interview. So why is this any different?
You don't need to like it or understand it, but it's not completely without entertainment value to some people
No more than any other game with a "make pretend" aspect to it.
And, obviously, I do not think real drumming is easy, not by a bloody long shot
But prior to that, it was all a blur of screeching noise that I couldn't stand.
Now? Metallica and a bunch of hard core punk are likely to be on my iPod.
As I said, my wife is eternally grateful for the game, as my musical horizons have blown past what they had been.
30 years ago (1998)
Are these dog years?