Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment: Three-month-old Continuum screenshot (Score 1) 4

by tepples (#48905921) Attached to: Windows 10: Charms Bar Removed, No Start Screen For Desktops

Google Images search for windows 10 continuum brings up images such as this one from this page. It looks like a small chunk of a Windows 8 Start screen and part of a Windows 7 Start menu put together. I'm assuming that the appearance of the new Continuum start menu didn't change when Microsoft removed the option to use full-screen Start screen.

Comment: Re:Offline reading (Score 1) 107

by tepples (#48905105) Attached to: Twitter Moves To Curb Instagram Links

You mean you don't check to make sure there wasn't a server issue or some other issue preventing the content from loading before you drop off of the network?

Usually I look at the first screenful of a document to see it is overwhelmingly more likely than not to have loaded. For most sites that don't use lazy loading, viewing the favicon and snippet of the <title> element in the browser's tab bar is enough. Or are you claiming that I ought to read the entire document before I read the document?

Comment: Tumblr (Score 1) 107

by tepples (#48900597) Attached to: Twitter Moves To Curb Instagram Links

If there was a service that came out with 300 characters as a limit, it would crush Twitter.

You mean like Tumblr or Blogspot or LiveJournal or just about any other blogging platform?

superior services will demolish their business if they don't listen to the number one complaint about Twitter from their users

I thought the biggest complaint about Twitter was sockpuppetry. See Twitter use thirteen different characters.

Comment: Offline reading (Score 1) 107

by tepples (#48900459) Attached to: Twitter Moves To Curb Instagram Links

Imagine the article loading in its entirety, so you can start reading it, before there's even a single image tag on the page; then, well-written javascript popping the images in as you read. The content loads and renders faster and you have an over-all better experience, especialy if you happen to be on a mobile device or slow connection.

I have the opposite experience. Because my mobile device has no cellular Internet connection, I often load pages over Wi-Fi at home and then read them while riding public transit. If a page uses this "lazy loading" technique, none of the images will load when I get around to reading them.

Comment: Re:Serious question (Score 1) 107

by tepples (#48900391) Attached to: Twitter Moves To Curb Instagram Links

I'm @PinoBatch.

But this list mentions Erris, Mactrope*, gnutoo, inTheLoo, willeyhill*, westbake*, Odder*, ibane, DeadZero, freenix, myCopyWrong, right handed, GNUChop, trimmer, and wiiiyhiii*. Or, rather, Twitter uses them. All of them. And this Twitter can post more than 140 characters.

* These are typosquatted versions of other Slashdot users' usernames.

Comment: Comcast's monthly HD technology fee (Score 1) 316

by tepples (#48900047) Attached to: UHD Spec Stomps on Current Blu-ray Spec, But Will Consumers Notice?

No, because they don't actially offer "SD only service", it's all HD now.

Cable TV is all digital, but not necessarily high-definition. Operators of digital cable systems can and do use conditional access in the digital cable platform to give 480i or 1080i versions of a particular channel to particular customers. For example, Comcast charges a "monthly HD technology fee" if an XFINITY TV customer has HD in his plan. This was true as of this forum post three years ago, and another forum post from three months ago confirms that it still is being charged. Or was it very recently discontinued?

Comment: Re:TV system doesn't match (Score 1) 316

by tepples (#48894975) Attached to: UHD Spec Stomps on Current Blu-ray Spec, But Will Consumers Notice?

Were you going RCA video out?

Yes. All three of these devices were pre-HDMI and used S-Video output.

But most of the other video standards, like RCA, composite, S-video and such are 1-way. It would be *impossible* for the system to "know" that the TV doesn't match.

The Apex would scale 576i at 50 Hz to 480i at 60 Hz. The others just threw up their hands and gave up.

I've never had any DVD played on a computer (or by association, out the computer's video out) that cared about PAL/NTSC.

From roughly 1987 to 2006, it was rare to connect a PC to a TV-sized monitor. PCs were for desks, and "consumer electronics" devices were for the living room, and conventional wisdom was that never the twain shall meet. SDTVs of that era that couldn't display the VGA or DVI signals coming from a computer, unlike now where most TVs have VGA and HDMI inputs respectively, and one had to buy an obscure scan converter (or a desktop PC video card with a built-in scan converter) to convert the signals.

Life would be so much easier if we could just look at the source code. -- Dave Olson

Working...