Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive


Forgot your password?
For the out-of-band Slashdot experience (mostly headlines), follow us on Twitter, or Facebook. ×

Comment: Not the only game in town (Score 2) 364 364

There are alternative theories, and they probably ought to get much more attention than they do. I think the fact that science is a career for people these days, makes them more keen to play things safe.

For example, Professor Mike Mcculloch's MiHsC seems to predict a variety of otherwise anomalous observations rather well, without endless fudge factors. He's a respected academic, but seems to get little mainstream scientific attention.

Comment: Models (Score 1) 525 525

I believe in science, but I do wonder about the accuracy of climate scientist's models. I remember reading Richard Feynman's account of a scientist's rat-in-a-maze experiment - "STILL, the rats could tell". It detailed how hard it is to control all the variables in an experiment - in that case, to make sure the rats were operating under the rules you thought they were. The same principles would surely apply to climate models, where the system they're modelling is enormously more complex.

Comment: Re: Marijuana's capacity to REVEAL TRUTH (Score 1) 291 291

Nuclear weapons have killed a little under 250,000 people world wide since 1945, whereas traffic deaths in 2010 alone were over a million worldwide. Therefore cars are more dangerous than nuclear weapons.

Such comparisons aren't very useful, because they ignore the fact that the weapons (thankfully) aren't used often.

Comment: Local minima (Score 1) 249 249

Their model isn't necessarily inadequate. Perhaps the cooperative strategy was simply easier to arrive at through evolution. The extortion strategy might be in a hard-to-reach part of behavioural state space. It's taken these brilliant mathematicians a good while to find it, after all. If evolution finds a suboptimal, but still beneficial strategy, it can be hard to subsequently jump out of that local minima to reach an even better solution.

Comment: Re:Slave Labour is certainly profitable (Score 2) 534 534

I'm using a PC, it was assembled in the UK, but as you point out, the components were surely made in the far East.
So what? Is your point that because we all use computers, and wear clothes that were made by workers in terrible conditions, that it is wrong to criticise those conditions?

I never said Apple were the only company that does this, but they are the biggest, and they have the largest gulf between their polished, doing-good-for-all image, and the reality.

Comment: Slave Labour is certainly profitable (Score 5, Insightful) 534 534

$18 billion profit, but they can't afford to make their phones in a country with decent labour laws. Nope, can't do it. The numbers just don't add up I tell you. Apple are the apotheosis of psychopathic corporate greed, at the expense of any human decency.

Comment: Re: Honest question. (Score 1) 479 479

Then where are they? Where are all these "dual talent pool" success stories? Why don't some of these diverse talents get together and trounce the white male at his own technological game? As a white male I would honestly give them a standing ovation if they did - nothing would make me happier than to see their success. But there's precious little sign of it, so what's stopping them?

The early bird who catches the worm works for someone who comes in late and owns the worm farm. -- Travis McGee