Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Re:Dubious story, dubious subject... (Score 3, Insightful) 92

by tattood (#43585401) Attached to: How LinkedIn's Project Inversion Saved the Company

One is about your ego and broadcasting to an audience of other people who are all busy worrying about their ego and broadcasting to their audience

I'd say that both sites fit that description. LinkedIn has turned into the "Facebook for professionals". It seems like most people's goal on LinkedIn is to connect with as many people as they can to get their "network" as large as they can. I have gotten LinkedIn requests from people that I met at a conference several years ago, and talked to for 5 minutes.

LinkedIn used to be about creating a network of trusted colleagues, that you want to keep in touch with, so that you could get trusted introductions to people you didn't know. If I trust person A, and person A trusts person B, B trusts C; therefore if person C is looking for a job opportunity, then they have a good chance of being a reasonably good candidate. That whole concept seems to have gotten lost in the last few years, and now it is all about having as many connections as you can.

Comment: Re:Last Sentence (Score 4, Interesting) 322

by tattood (#43539221) Attached to: Federal Magistrate Rules That Fifth Amendment Applies To Encryption Keys

But you can't be compelled to provide evidence against yourself that the government doesn't know you have.

What if the drive contains the evidence that they know you have, but it also contains other evidence that they do NOT know you have, which one would have precedence? If decrypting the drive will give them access to other evidence that would incriminate you in another crime.

Comment: Re:$2000? (Score 2) 72

by tattood (#43473365) Attached to: Anonymous Raises Over $54,000 For Dedicated Your Anon News Website

The major issue I see with this plan, is most datacenters allow 3 letter agencies to just walk in, and copy drives.

I doubt that they will be hosting the source code for their cracking tools or internal forums for their secret stuff. It is probably going to be just a blog of sorts that they can use as their official channel for news about their activity. Who cares of the govt takes the drives if it's all public info anyway? And do you really think they are going to host it in the U.S.A.?

Comment: Re:No you don't. (Score 1) 631

by tattood (#43404255) Attached to: No Such Thing As a Tax-Free Lunch At Google?

And Google is paying taxes on the lunch menu.

This is not about Google not paying taxes on the food they provide. This is about Google giving free lunch to their employees, instead of the employees having to pay for their lunch. They are basically saying that if Google employees eat for free every day, they are getting a "bonus", in that they are not having to pay their own money for food. The govt thinks that the employees should have to pay tax on the free lunch, not Google.

Comment: Re:Barbara Streisand effect... (Score 1) 197

by tattood (#43369415) Attached to: Film Studios Send Takedown Notices About Takedown Notices

If the *AA's begin to make the world suck too bad for Google, they could just purchase them and eradicate all of it.

You make it sound as if buying another company is as easy as buying a gallon of milk. Buying another company requires interest on both sides, as well as a lot of paperwork an politics to get it approved.
Also, Google is not in the business of making content. They don't actually produce any content on any of their sites. They simply index what other people have created, and make it available.

According to Yahoo finance, Google has 48 billion in cash.

Google could easily just buy the entire industry. Every single one of those companies. With cash. Several times over.

Universal was bought by Comcast, which has a market cap of 108 billion. Nice try.

Comment: Re:A paradox? (Score 1) 207

by tattood (#43283733) Attached to: No "Ungoogleable" In Swedish Lexicon, Thanks to Google

Google is however doing nothing to prevent this usage, they are specifically targeting the usage of the word ungoogleable.

This is probably because they don't want anything to be ungoogleable. If something exists, but cannot be found in Google, then Google is not doing their job of making that thing searchable.

Comment: Re:How is this news? (Score 1) 77

by tattood (#43183685) Attached to: The Internet's Bad Neighborhoods

China most defiantly has the resources, ... Start putting pressure on ISPs that allow their networks to be abused.

I'm pretty sure that China's government doesn't care about the amount of spam being generated from their networks because the target of the spam is not their citizens, but rather people in other countries.

Comment: Re:Windows 7 (Score 2) 965

by tattood (#43166075) Attached to: Ask Slashdot: Mac To Linux Return Flow?

You don't get to say they took shit away from you when you actively have to do something yourself to have the change effect you.

Not true. Both Chrome and Firefox do not support OSX Leopard (10.5) anymore, and I'm sure there are a lot of other software that do the same. When Apple stops supporting an OS, software makers also stop supporting it, so you lose out on getting the latest software updates.

Comment: Re:And they (the workers) demand lower wages... (Score 2) 617

by tattood (#42951531) Attached to: Large Corporations Displacing Aging IT Workers With H-1B Visa Workers

they settle for lower wages. To them, $50 a week is still like winning the lottery

That would be true if the workers were being paid to work remotely, while still living in their lower-income country. If those workers are using the visas to come to the USA, then the lower wages are nowhere near enough to survive on. What you end up seeing is 8-10 people renting a house together because it is all they can afford.

Diplomacy is the art of letting the other party have things your way. -- Daniele Vare

Working...