here's the link to the google interview: http://youtube.com/watch?v=m4yVlPqeZwo bubblesort is at around 22:50. A lot of these questions mentioned here have been asked at the google interview or were addressed by obama in his speech. I think the candidates@google interviews show several of these guys obama, edwards, mccain, clinton, paul talking about issues of interest to the
adinb writes: "Does anyone know of any widely used scoring systems for evaluation of credibility of cited sources? While I've seen guides (like this one from cornell) or this wikipedia article, I haven't seen any standardized scoring systems that apply a numerical score to source credibility. I'm thinking of something as simple as +5 for a current, double-blind study published in a peer reviewed journal, funded by non-partisan sources to -5 for an out of date, non peer reviewed article from a partisan source. If there aren't any "simple" systems out there, is this something we should create to help with evaluation of content on the net and in our society?"