Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

[ Create a new account ]

stoolpigeon (454276)

stoolpigeon
  bittercode@gmail
http://thepeckfamily.us/
AOL IM: ronpeckjr (Add Buddy, Send Message)

I am a database administrator for Campus Crusade for Christ International. (Oracle 10g on aix and MS SQL Server 2000) I work at the world headquarters in Orlando, Florida. There is much more about CCCI and us at our home page, ThePeckFamily.us

I was born in Kalamazoo, MI - grew up in Phoenix, AZ - spent a little time in the Navy, homeported out of Alameda, CA - picked up a B.A. in Theology at Moody Bible Institute in Chicago, IL - picked up a B.S. in I.T. at DeVry in Phoenix - and here I am.

Journal of stoolpigeon (454276)

Glass

[ #178851 ]
Friday August 10 2007, @01:39PM
Silicon Graphics
This article on glass and its properties is pretty interesting. But the best part of it was this hilarious quote:
"The ability to take microscopy movies has greatly improved during the past five to 10 years," Weeks says. "Back in the mid-90s, the raw data from one two-hour data set would be four gigabytes. It would have completely filled up your hard drive. Now, it's just a tiny part of your hard drive, like a single DVD."

I think I know what he means - but at least as I read it, it didn't come out that way. It would have helped if he had just said the ability to store microscopy movies has improved - not the ability to take them.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More | Login
Loading... please wait.
  • 4 GB doesn't come anywhere close to filling my (relatively small) hard drive and one DVD (full-length movie) is a lot more that 4 GB, isn't it?
    • a single layer dvd is 4.7 gig. it struck me as funny because as i read it, it seemed to me that he was saying the filming technique had made the file smaller - but as I looked at it, i think the remark was more aimed at the fact that hard drives have become much larger. maybe it was just funny to me, that happens a lot.
    • I think in the mid 90's a 4 gig hard drive would be pretty big, at least for a home computer.