Comment: Re:There was a TED talk about robot birds that siz (Score 1) 232
You should learn to shotgun your beers, unless of course it was a Gunnies and if that's the case you should have spent two minutes pouring it.
Shit. I spelt Guinness wrong...here come the drunk spelling nazis.
Comment: Re:There was a TED talk about robot birds that siz (Score 1) 232
Took about 45 seconds to find on Google. Most of the time was spent opening the beer can.
You should learn to shotgun your beers, unless of course it was a Gunnies and if that's the case you should have spent two minutes pouring it.
Comment: Re:Will anyone use Lion 'server'? (Score 2) 303
Right, it's not really ment to be end user serviced, because most end users are not capable of servicing a dead drive. You simply pay $149 to extend you AppleCare coverage to three years when you purchase your shiny new macmini server, and when a drive fails they can walk it into an apple store and the "Genius" will replace the drive for them, no extra charge.
THAT is exactly what small businesses need. I've worked large multi-national enterprise IT, and I've worked small business; oftentimes my "Enterprise" brain wants to kick in and build out a fully redundant setup for a small business that is only employing 8 people making a few thousand profit each month. In my mind of five nines of uptime it makes sense, but for those 8 people it makes no sense at all.
Comment: Re:Will anyone use Lion 'server'? (Score 1) 303
a mini/mac pro as a fileserver for a small business might not be bonkers, but beyond SOHO use, why would anyone bother with a mac server?
SOHO / SMB is their target now. A mac mini with RAID-1 drives is more than sufficient, and many times more capable than what I see a lot of small business using.
Comment: Already known?? D.H.E. 45 (Score 1) 272
Comment: Re:Not bothered (Score 0, Offtopic) 1162
The $ sign goes in front of the number, dumbass.
Not everywhere, dumbass.
Comment: Re:Open source data center? (Score 1) 70
Where can I download the data? >__>
zynga.com servers
Comment: Re:Nightlife .. (Score 1) 251
Comment: Make it a pic of your cat instead. (Score 2, Interesting) 510
I'm not usually the one to post these types of 'fix it yourself' OSS comments...
Download the source
replace oracle logos with something else
compile
problem solved (profit?)..
Comment: Re:Solution (Score 1) 357
None of this is default behaviour though. It might be tired and you might be sick of hearing it over and over but that's because it's a problem for a lot of people.
[citation needed]
If it is a real problem, that *real* people (not just slashdotters) care about, they need to seek out a solution...that already exists. If it is too advanced for them, and it is still an issue for them on facebook then they need to practice self preservation and remove their account.
Judging by your reaction to me, it sounds like you have very little sympathy for that and that they get what they deserve. I think that says more about you than me.
Yep.
Comment: Re:Solution (Score 1) 357
That doesn't stop random asshats tagging you in photos.
Yeah...but it's pretty easy to adjust the privacy settings so that only you can see the photos you are tagged in, effectively turning off the 'feature'. Also the 'random asshats' would be people you explicitly added as a friend.
Try actually using the site before you just repeat the same tired phrase you hear over and over.
Comment: please send me the codes. (Score 1) 466
Can't wait to see this future post on every java forum.
"Please send me the java codes for operating system to jawadiwahail2243@hotmail.com"
Comment: Re:Paranoid much? (Score 1) 152
Facebook places is only for iPhone and phones that support W3 geolocation, and only available via native application or touch.facebook.com. You also actually have to explicitly 'check in' / 'check out' of places.
Only half correct. You state that the metaphorical 'you' has to explicitly have to 'check in' to places, but you're friends have the ability to check you into places by default. "Out having coffee with @w0mprat, having a great convo about privacy, could last hours"
from blog.facebook.com....
"When your friends check you in, it is as if you have checked in at that place yourself. You also will appear checked-in to your friends."
Comment: Re:Why on server? (Score 1) 133
Because not all scanners are directly plugged into user computers with a software interface.
I have a large office MFP that scans into network shares and with this little server running I can have it watch that share and fix up my PDF's real nice for the users, rather than installing something on everyones computers.