Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed


Forgot your password?

Comment To put the punishments in perspective... (Score 1) 266

Anyone who reveals or receives confidential information or documentation risks six months to two years in prison and a €2,000 euro ($2,500) fine; the penalty goes up to eight years in prison if the material concerns the "fundamental interests" of the Holy See or its diplomatic relations with other countries.

Never mind the treatment of Bradley Manning, these punishments are tame even when you compare them to the 50 years faced by Aaron Swartz.

Comment Here in the UK... (Score 1) 631

In the UK food served in company cafeterias is generally tax exempt, as long as the cafeteria is open to all employees. It's usually where management get their own "premium" menu that their benefit would be considered taxable.

As far as food in general, anything considered non-essential is usually subject to VAT (Value Added Tax) which is our equivalent of US Sales Tax. This leads to arguments as to what is or isn't essential, with the recent Pasty tax being a good example.

Comment Re:Was this ruling because the content was porn? (Score 1) 189

I imagine that where the material is deemed unsavoury a John Doe approach might have better success.

If being publicly accused of downloading pornography is enough to cause embarrassment people might be more likely to settle out of court, regardless of whether they think the case has merit.

In Nature there are neither rewards nor punishments, there are consequences. -- R.G. Ingersoll