Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment: Re:Yeah, but women want it all (Score 1) 427

by steg0 (#46424885) Attached to: All Else Being Equal: Disputing Claims of a Gender Pay Gap In Tech

So, there is some kind of unfair scheme being pursued by women in which they achieve an unmatchable degree of perceived physical attractiveness (hence the sexual power and the fawning), and expect equal pay on top of it?

(1) If there is, they have been failing rather badly at it over the past few decades, unless you take these 111% mentioned in TFA for granted, but I'm really not that sure about it.

(2) Your view of what's physically attractive is always biased by your own gender; meaning if you're a (hetero) man, you'll likely find an unfair advantage in attractiveness in the female; a good part of it might not have anything to do with any intent on their side. In fact, the assumption that they're guilty of making you feel attracted to them, give them presents etc. (i. e. bewitching you) is a pretty problematic line of thought. For any observable incident involving dollar-spending on the male part, an equally justifiable explanation is always that of a naive, romanticized idea of chivalry on behalf of the spender.

(3) Wouldn't any agenda that aimed at getting better treatment by physically appealing to the other gender cancel itself out once 50% of all management positions were held by females? So all we have to do is sit down and wait...

Comment: Re:Definitely more (Score 1) 270

by steg0 (#46328087) Attached to: How much time do you spend gaming compared to 10 years ago?
Ha, same here. Was working part time back then, visiting the occasional lecture, plus all this drinking in the dorm, had a junk PC myself, and only Suns in the lab... OK they could run GLQuake and Crossfire but that wasn't my cup of tea... Now as a full-time employee I somehow have a lot more spare time...

Comment: Re:Uh... (Score 1) 362

by steg0 (#45272585) Attached to: Debian To Replace SysVinit, Switch To Systemd Or Upstart

Nothing is stopping you running your init scripts in parallel if you need it.

Quite true, actually I think in Debian this is already supported for the system boot sequence at least since Squeeze.

Together with dash being the default /bin/sh now, it already boots pretty fast, I don't see the startup time being a major factor in this decision.

It's probably more because of the fact that systemd now reaches into areas beyond pure service control that forces Debian to either follow that move or switch to another alternative that has enough manpower behind it.

Comment: Re:How safe? (Score 1) 947

by steg0 (#45235701) Attached to: How Safe Is Cycling?

(And you would be surprised how many girls like the smell of a man who smells like a man and not like a pool of aftershave, deo and soap)

Even assuming this was true despite it sounding like a Gene Hunt quote, on /. it's not the most striking argument...

For my part, I'm not a girl and I currently have a bunch of bike-riders sitting a few meters down the hall from my office, and on some days I smell the sweat coming out of their offices whenever I have to go past them. OK maybe it's not them but the colorful mountainwear they hang over their chairs, but it's pretty bothersome. When 2000 people are packed in one building there ought to be some standards. (This also means no offensive fragrances, of course.)

The Media

How You Too Can Be Shut Down By the Feds For Flying Drones 195

Posted by timothy
from the fame-and-fortune-await dept.
An anonymous reader writes "University of Nebraska-Lincoln professor Matt Waite waived a government cease and desist letter recently received for his experiments using 3-pound, $500 drones for news reporting (specifically, for a story about drought in Nebraska). He gave journalism organizations the lowdown on what they can expect from the government on this front going forward and said he's posting his experience in trying to get certified by the FAA on GitHub so they can follow along."
Encryption

Building an Opt-In Society 182

Posted by timothy
from the dreams-pipe-dreams-and-escaping-dystopia dept.
An anonymous reader writes "In a talk at Y Combinator's startup school event, Stanford lecturer Balaji Srinivasan explained his vision for governing systems of the future. The idea is to find space to set up a new 'opt-in' society outside existing governments, and design it to take full advantage of technology to keep people in control of their own lives. That means embracing tech that subverts existing industries and rejecting regulation on new ways of doing things. '[N]ew industries are simultaneously disrupting existing ones while also exiting the system entirely, he says. With 3D printing, regulation is being turned into DRM. With quantified self, medicine is going mobile. With Bitcoin, capital control becomes packet filtering. All of these examples, Srinivasan says, are ways in which technology is allowing people to exit current systems like physical product production and distribution; personal health; and finance in favor of spaces of their own creation.' Srinivasan's ideas are a natural extension of a few proposals already in the works — Peter Thiel has been trying to build a small tech incubator city that floats in international waters, outside of government control. Elon Musk wants to have a Mars colony, and Larry Page has wished for a tech-centric Burning man that's free from government regulation. 'The best part is this,' Srinivasan said. 'The people who think this is weird, the people who sneer at the frontier, who hate technology, won't follow you there.'"

Comment: Re:Obama Fellatio HQ (Score 1) 472

by steg0 (#44801091) Attached to: Ask Slashdot: Linux Security, In Light of NSA Crypto-Subverting Attacks?

Being one of those liberal hippies you seem to be attempting to blame for "Republican Military-Industrial Complex Elitism As Usual" let me speak on our behalf:

No. Mr. O does not speak for me. Mr. O is just another "Republican Moderate" in allegedly liberal clothing [if he had been a *real* liberal he would have gotten us the "Single Provider" [aka Socialist} version of healthcare like all reasonable western countries have rather than the Capitalist "bend over, here's the bill" Romney-care.

I think that a government that is likely to give you socialist healthcare is also not likely one that is going to disband an agency like the NSA, mainly because it's not one to disband any agency. (If the situation here in Europe can be any indicator.) The "perfect" laissez-faire society would be the one without an NSA. Now granted there is no such thing in the real world and it would just mean going over that civil vs. economic liberty thing again. But still. Hiding away talented mathematicians and engineers like that is just a waste of taxpayer money.

Comment: Re:The theater is dead. (Score 1) 924

by steg0 (#44152927) Attached to: The Average Movie Theater Has Hundreds of Screens

I mean, other than for a midnight premiere, does anyone actually go to the movies anymore?

I rarely go to the theater to see a single movie, but I very often visit themed (e. g. Japanese / splatter / Japanese splatter / etc.) film festivals where you can watch five or six movies a day, over a period of one or two weeks. These offer value that I don't find elsewhere. The movies are not going to run in town later. They often wouldn't even be released on DVD in my area, meaning I would have to import them, which could mean $50 each. Some of them later run on subscription TV but you can't be sure of that in advance. Streaming might be an option someday, but my country really has a lot of catching up to do there.

That said, people using their phone is pretty much a non-issue there. The more common nuisance are glass beer bottles tipping over, which is unfortunate if your bag was standing next to them on the floor. But really this can happen to anybody, you can't be mad at them.

But yeah, I'm not sure about the future of the mainstream movie theater industry either. 3D might be its swan song.

Comment: Re:Why didn't 'Andriod' use BSD codebase? (Score 1) 220

by steg0 (#44077947) Attached to: Happy 20th Birthday, FreeBSD
A good question which I've asked myself a number of times. As for Android, its libc is BSD based, but the kernel isn't.

I don't know whether the decision to use a Linux kernel for Android was made at Android, Inc or later at Google, but it's pretty clear that Google wanted Linux.

I suppose at the time, the whole Linux mobile thing had already generated a sufficient amount of traction so that a lot of the necessary infrastructure was already there.

I was working for a mobile phone manufacturer at the time (that was later acquired and shut down by BenQ) and for us, the successor to Symbian would have been Linux, too, built along the Opie and Qtopia userlands on Texas Instruments OMAP hardware. Both Google and Trolltech had offices in the city (Munich). At that time, Google was still developing its products as J2ME software though.

Comment: Re:It just works (Score 4, Informative) 220

by steg0 (#44077807) Attached to: Happy 20th Birthday, FreeBSD

I recall frequent kernel panics while booting that were related to the Intel Ethernet chipset on a SuperMicro H8SGL-F board (not exactly the least common hardware) in a released version (I think it was 8.2 or 8.3), which was probably this. Rather annoying.

There have been other problems, too (off the top of my head), like

  • the mediocre PAE support,
  • and the in my eyes rather ungracefully handled transition to Xorg 7.2 in the 6.x releases, which for me didn't work at all like the documentation said, although this was not a problem of the base system, but the ports collection.
  • Then there's stuff like some guys arbitrarily deciding to reimplement the system installer and on top of that, to remove the old one in the time window between 9.0 RC 3 and 9.0-RELEASE, see (along with some elitist Linux bashing going on:) here and here
  • or the transition to Clang at a time when it wasn't even ready for the non-x86 architectures!

So sometimes I ask myself whether this OS is really ready for prime time

But enough of the rant. I've been sticking to it since 2000 and for most of the time it just runs and does its job. It's got some nice coherent documentation too.

Comment: Re:Why aren't there more contributors to this proj (Score 1) 252

by steg0 (#43882023) Attached to: ReactOS 0.3.15 Released

To continue in the pedantic mode, Minix was not microkernel in versions 1 & 2, but is now, in version 3.

Well I mean Minix was already microkernel at the point of the Tanenbaum/Torvalds discussion. (Kind of funny actually how the later replies to that thread talk about how legendary that same thread is.) Don't know what version it was though.

Comment: Re:Why aren't there more contributors to this proj (Score 1) 252

by steg0 (#43874501) Attached to: ReactOS 0.3.15 Released

An absolute necessity for performance reasons. They tried doing it in userspace in NT4 and it just couldn't keep up.

Actually NT4 was already the first version to move GDI into the kernel, because of (as you and others have already mentioned) the high cost of context switches and marshalling/unmarshalling in NT 3.5's microkernel-style display server architecture. See this TechNet article.

It's later than you think, the joint Russian-American space mission has already begun.

Working...