I thought he was trying for the "Least of all evils" vote, at least in terms of getting the Republican nomination. The Republicans really seem to hate their choices this year. I mean, at one point, they were seriously hoping Fred Thompson would win, and he's an actor, and not even a terribly good one, and you know how Republicans are about political involvement by Hollywood celebrities. Oh, wait.
Well, I actually saw my first "Vote for..." sign today that was in someone's garden, rather than littering the side of the highway. And it was for Romney. I had to do a double take.
Now, I've seen plenty of vote-for signs in Florida, they've all been for Ron Paul, and the paultards putting them up have put them everywhere except their own front yards. Which, I guess, tells you yet more about what kind of person actually supports Ron Paul.
So, someone in my neighbourhood actually genuinely likes Mitt Romney. Enough to actively support him. Wow.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the Poster. The Rest © 1997-2008 SourceForge, Inc.
LDS (Score:2)
Considering how little a voice that Oregon has in the Primaries, I'm not going to get too worked up one way or the other until the the final docket is set. If no
Re: (Score:2)
I actually fit in with the "least of the evils" as I'll be voting for Romney in the Texas primary just to keep the nomination away from John McCain (too liberal*) and Mike Suckabee (stupid, liberal*, and a jackass).
I was going to vote for Fred Thompson, but only because Duncan Hunter had the problem that no one had heard of him.
I do feel marginally better
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
no Republican signs here (Score:2)
All of their guys got massively trounced in 2006; maybe they're feeling gun-shy.
Don't suppose there's anyone giving away Bloomberg 08 signs? I'd