I wouldn't knock this guy... he's been on both sides, obviously. Its a valuable perspective
That last point was really a throwaway, but even moving enough to cutting a commute by half (say) saves that much time over the years its like the second job you didn't need to keep.
My answer said *ask*, not "demand".
If employers are reluctant, ask for a trial -- say, commute everyday for the first two month (settle in, build relationships). Then the trial - work from home a day a week for two months. Then, the employer considers changing your home/office mixture.
Please remember -- more productivity at home is often at the expense of less productivity of your colleagues at the office. Simply because its easier to walk up and interrupt them in person. Acknowledging this fact will go a long smooth toward smoothing over potential jealously (your colleagues), and potential heartburn (your's - if your request was declined).
If still no, and the job's a keeper, try moving closer to work.
Will work that OS's do change much in future you think?
Will their core work still be interfacing filesystems, networking, processes and accounts to the underlying tin?
Will some UI-type tasks typically carried out by applications shift the OS? (UI: voice/video/gaze/gesture recognition... user information management: social feeds, messages... environment management:
Its is a peculiar computer science conceit - that people, with their biases and foibles, can be replaced by sufficiently sophisticated computing resources.
The conceit shows up everywhere - from users with 'system says no' responses, to Google's algorithmic approach to everything, to OLPC talking of heli-dropping laptops into remote villages, to apps for everything: no matter how unimportant.
Unfortunately, instead of augmenting humans tech tries to supplant them
Didn't Allstate show up yesterday with a silly patent?
First an overly broad patent (wait until a toilet seat manufacturer patents 'diagnosing- while-enthroned'). Now this.
Thought I don't think there's anything wrong with using a drone for this, as long as inhabitants (i.e. owners and renters) of a covered property have a choice in the matter. But its likely someone in Allstate is already dreams of a fleet of cheap unmanned drones in every Allstate building, sent off on frequent 'combat missions' to increase premiums and reduce claims.
Looks like someone's funded Allstate's Technology department a bit too well.
And also, making that information available to specified "private entities".
(probably any entity with enough money to muscle into some named market)
Nukes were and are produced by government owned national labs*. Not by gunsmiths-turned-megacorps.
Nukes = nuclear bombs.
Nukes != yellowcake.
No. Private citizens or corporations cannot lawfully buy nukes. Or import them from Russia.
*Now operated by private contractors to whom the govt. pays a management fee: http://thebulletin.org/us-nucl...
The govt. still owns the labs.
The shooter in Sydney had access to one 1950s era French shotgun. He could only kill one person before special operations police killed him. Same guy with US gun laws = fully automatic weapons.
By the same token, US citizens should be able to buy nukes!
Now there *is* the small possibility of owners going postal now and again! Perhaps even rendering the place inhabitable. But thats a small price to pay for a free market, right? In the long run, the market always sorts it out (perhaps has a different species take over... maybe cockroaches.... viva la market!).
I wouldn't knock anecdotes. Science is basically a set of carefully written anecdotes confirming one another.