Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment: Re:Cue stupid comments from non-Australians (Score 5, Informative) 452

by solferino (#42240809) Attached to: Australian Police Warn That Apple Maps Could Get Someone Killed

It's also quite plausible that you can die - it has happened before. People get lost, they run out of fuel, they don't have water, the temperature easily gets up into the 40-50C range and - dead.

This happened only last month when two guys working on a station got their 4WD bogged 10 miles from the homestead and tried to walk back under the hot sun. One of them died from heat and dehydration.

Comment: Situation 6) Assange becomes an Australian senator (Score 4, Interesting) 1065

Situation 6) Ecuador grants Assange asylum, the UK don't carry through their threat of storming the embassy and the situation remains as a stand-off with Assange holed up in the embassy ... until 2013 when an Australian election is due. Assange has already publicly stated that he is considering running for election to the senate next year. He does and is elected easily (as he would need only 14.3% of the population of whatever state he stands in to vote for him - probably Victoria). This escalates the situation to a much higher level - the UK/US/Sweden would now be looking at arresting an elected Australian politician.

Comment: Re:Nuclear disaster nearly shut down Tokyo (Score 3, Informative) 224

by solferino (#40348045) Attached to: Japan Restarts Two of Its 50 Nuclear Reactors

The 400-page report, due to be released later this week, also describes a darkening mood at the prime minister's residence as a series of hydrogen explosions rocked the plant on March 14 and 15. It says Mr. Kan and other officials began discussing a worst-case outcome if workers at the Fukushima Daiichi plant were evacuated. This would have allowed the plant to spiral out of control, releasing even larger amounts of radioactive material into the atmosphere that would in turn force the evacuation of other nearby nuclear plants, causing further meltdowns.

The report quotes the chief cabinet secretary at the time, Yukio Edano, as having warned that such a 'demonic chain reaction' of plant meltdowns could result in the evacuation of Tokyo, 150 miles to the south.

"We would lose Fukushima Daini, then we would lose Tokai," Mr. Edano is quoted as saying, naming two other nuclear plants. "If that happened, it was only logical to conclude that we would also lose Tokyo itself."

Source: NY Times article on top-level report reviewing the disaster.

Comment: Nuclear disaster nearly shut down Tokyo (Score 0, Flamebait) 224

by solferino (#40347555) Attached to: Japan Restarts Two of Its 50 Nuclear Reactors

To all the uranium power nuclear boosters who will appear in this thread I have one fact to remind you of. The Japanese PM at the time of the disaster was seriously considering having to evacuate Tokyo. If he had not forced Tepco to be more proactive in their management of the disaster and thus managed to head-off a nuclear cascade (with the disaster spreading to nuclear reactors closer to Tokyo) this would have happened.

Imagine what that would have done to Japan and its economy. Not total wipe-out for the country but it would have certainly brought it to its knees. If there was a similar disaster in one of Taiwan's uranium reactors it would destroy the country as there is nowhere far enough to get away in that small island which has a population of over 20 million and is a key part of the IT supply chain.

These risks are too significant and severe to hazard and we have shown that we do not have the level of social and political sophistication to contain them.

I'm not saying that some of the existing reactors might not need to be restarted. But no new uranium reactors should ever be built and massive investment should be thrown into renewable energy and thorium nuclear.

The Internet

+ - The Guardian nominates 20 fighters for internet freedom->

Submitted by
solferino
solferino writes "As part of their week long series on the Battle for the Internet, the Guardian newspaper has compiled a list of 20 people who they consider champions of the open internet and fighters for freedom online.

But have they picked the best twenty? If you don't agree with some of their choices or believe they have missed someone who is essential to the list, you can make your opinion known here."

Link to Original Source

Comment: Defending environments that foster innovation (Score 1) 185

by solferino (#39374365) Attached to: VisiCalc's Dan Bricklin On the Tablet Revolution

It's worth making it through the article for the final two paragraphs, which I found poignant.

Concerns? I'm concerned that too few people are focusing enough on what we haven't been able to do that's now possible. I want to make sure we can do what we want on these machines. We need the ability to experiment. We used to be able to experiment a lot more. But in the world of day-to-day trade-offs between security and innovation, we're out of balance. We talk a lot about what we need to do to keep things secure, but nowhere near enough about what we need to do to keep things fertile.

So long as we give people general-purpose tools that let them build things, we're OK. It's when we start to take them away that we get into trouble. I hope we always have popular machines people can use that aren't restricted, so that those who have the desire and ideas to do something can, and can share it with others.

Comment: Widening the Overton Window (Score 2) 543

by solferino (#38648736) Attached to: Pirate Party Leader: Copyright Laws Ridiculous

Rick, I'm glad you're saying this. We need to widen the Overton Window in this debate.

I tell my friends I simply don't believe in copyright, full stop. I don't have any qualms in ignoring it. I don't believe in trying for 'reasonable reform'. I only believe in the eradication of copyright monopolies of whatever duration.

Comment: Re:Stallman ROFL (Score 1) 99

by solferino (#38096496) Attached to: Computing Pioneers Share Their First Tech Memories

Nice sidestep Richard. How about just answering the simple question?

I don't think it's a sidestep. The question was about modern technology. Stallman answers that he thinks modern technology is getting worse not better 'in terms of freedom'. Stallman quite often says that he started the FSF in the 80's because he was nostalgic for computing in the 70's. He quite literally sees things in terms of freedom and so it is consistent for him to say that he doesn't wish he had current technology when he was growing up as he sees it as less free.

Comment: Re:Hmm (Score 1) 107

by solferino (#36745392) Attached to: Chris Dibona On Free Software and Google

In the more familiar usage of the word 'Linux' to mean a distribution of familiar UNIXish tools from GNU, X.org, Moz Corp, GNOME/KDE, etc.

Which is why this usage is incorrect and why RMS was right in talking about GNU/Linux (what you are basically describing above).

As you say at the start of your comment, it is technically correct to call Android a linux based system because yes, it runs the Linux kernel. When talking about computers, technically correct speech is what matters.

Nothing is more admirable than the fortitude with which millionaires tolerate the disadvantages of their wealth. -- Nero Wolfe

Working...