whatever, .com is a bad habit after this many years. I don't spend much time at *.gov...
Maybe so... Most of them are downloading LOIC and joining in the fun. They are not hackers or crackers or anything. They are, if anything, protesters. The ones who are rooting and dropping the real dox aren't talking and that is the point.

I don't think you get it. Of course you brag when you DDOS the CIA's servers and take down cia.com.

You will never hear a word about them rooting all their servers though. Maybe one day but that's only because they have to do a release of information.

Now, if blood were shed, they'd either immediately give up or take up arms. Now, if the US were India and had a Gandhi or another Martin Luther King standing up...

We will never know if a MLK or a Gandhi has stood up or is standing up, as long as the media mocks movements like OWS. For all anyone knows the next great leader is standing right in front of us. Too bad all we do is make fun of them for wanting something different than what there is.

And it should be; this is our fucking freedoms we're discussing.

Call me a tin foil hat wearing loony all you want. It's like that for a reason.

Firm grasp of the obvious huh?

I am not ignoring it. I get it. My last reply was pointing out that a la carte programming would destroy the economics of the industry. But I don't care about their industry. In the current setup, yes it would cost me more to get what I want. I completely understand that and am not ignoring it. I also stated that if the price was too high then I would decide at that point if it was worth it. I do not agree that because the economics of some industry may be disrupted that I have to continue to support it and should not seek other options. I am certain that others would agree with me. Maybe not you...

I don't care if you agree with me though, and don't bold the letters like I am some retard. It's condescending.

I don't have a problem with tuning in at a specific time. They can broadcast online and sell me access. That's not that hard. Same as traditional TV just online. I think they should keep cable and do that anyways. CBS can charge $20 per month to watch their network online. Like MLB.tv.

I don't get why all of you are so opposed to the idea. The FCC was for a la carte programming. I understand that it can really hurt the economics of the TV industry, but I also think that if the home shopping network can't sell enough junk to stay on the air that's their problem. I shouldn't have to pay for something I don't want. I am about to just disconnect it anyways. The negative far outweighs any benefits of paying for a bunch of crap channels I never watch.

Isn't that assuming that the show would only stream from one location? Certainly we have technologies that allow 75Tb not not be true. Multicast? Just sayin...

Well, if the case was a specific channel costs more, then I would consider at that time how much I really want it. I have the basic package now. No add ons. I have 3 kids and they watch 2 channels. I watch probably 2. Whale wars and science shows sometimes. I just think the networks or whatever should stream the content and charge a monthly fee. Cut out the middle man all together. Then Google TV would be worth something. So would Roku and all the others.

Shutup. Dickhead. I would prefer not to even have a damn TV. I wonder how many kids you have? I bet you watch TV every day. The topic is about Google TV. I don't think any of them are worth anything.

However, why exactly are you coming to a discussion about television and telling everyone to go fuck themselves? If you don't like the fact that people have opinions about technology and its delivery in the first world, then move to a fucking hut in a village and stop reading websites about technology. Got it?