Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).

×

Comment: Re:Running only Windows on a Mac (Score 1) 207

by slaker (#49313319) Attached to: For Boot Camp Users, New Macs Require Windows 8 Or Newer

I have a "Type"-style (the same sort the Pro 3 uses) purple cover for my Pro 2. I paid $58 for it on Amazon. I actually wanted purple but I could've gotten a pink one even cheaper. Would I take a refurbished keyboard? No question that I would. We use other people's keyboards all the damned time, especially those of us who have an IT support component to our jobs (or for that matter anyone who has ever used an ATM). Am I looking places besides major retailers? No I am not. If you can't find one at a significant discount, you probably shouldn't be buying anything over the internet.

The Surface keyboard is entirely optional. I don't completely love the Windows on-screen keyboard, though it's a damned-sight better than the one Apple ships with iOS (Apple is either not a big fan of basic literacy or thinks letters should always be displayed in uppercase regardless of the state of the shift key). In practice I've found that I don't use it much because my Surface Pro more as a very capable mobile device than as something for real work, but I have powerful desktops and a good laptop available to me as well.

Speaking to the quality of Apple's input devices specifically, I find the lack of key travel and mildly idiosyncratic layout on Apple's own branded keyboards uncomfortable for serious typing in exactly the same way the Surface Type-style keyboard is. I also question the ergonomics of the palmrests on its notebooks and the insistence on comically oversized touchpads as input devices. I wouldn't exactly say either option is without compromise.

Comment: Re:Running only Windows on a Mac (Score 2) 207

by slaker (#49311865) Attached to: For Boot Camp Users, New Macs Require Windows 8 Or Newer

MSRP is $130 for a Surface Pro 3 keyboard. They generally sell for under $100, sometimes under $80 if you don't mind one of the less popular colors or getting a refurbished one. I'm not sure where you're getting this $200 figure from, but it's significantly off-base.
Further, the Surface Pro doesn't have a hard requirement that you use Microsoft's keyboard. You can use any bluetooth or USB input devices you'd like.

Comment: Re:RAID (Score 1) 76

by slaker (#49221021) Attached to: Intel Announces Xeon D SoC Line Based On Broadwell Core Architecture

Anything that has a modern LSI chip can probably be flashed to Target Initiator mode. I've gotten PERC and IBM M-series SAS controllers for $80 off ebay. You can add in an SAS expander if you need more than 8 drives.
With that kind of setup, you don't have to depend on motherboard ports and can buy whatever makes the most sense.

Comment: Re:Just make it less bloated (Score 2) 300

by slaker (#49196099) Attached to: Mozilla: Following In Sun's Faltering Footsteps?

Ordinarily, I'd agree with you, but a few weeks ago I saw Chrome hit just a little short of 9GB RAM utilization on a machine that had been rebooted perhaps four hours before, with only a dozen open tabs. Was that a poor interaction between Chrome and my ad blocker and whatever the hell javascript and .GIFVs on Imgur does? Probably. But there's no way a browser's processes should be using more RAM than running virtual machines.

Comment: Re:One way into mobile market (Score 2) 112

Pick a benchmark that's representative of your computing needs. Look at relevant benchmark scores.

Recent Intel CPUs are differentiated by their GPUs and TDP moreso than clock speed or thread performance, which is probably why a brand new Haswell i3 is only just a bit faster than an original Nehalem i7 from all the way back in 2008.

If you want top-end per thread performance, you probably want an i5. If you want that and need more cores than a typical desktop, get an i7. You probably don't need to worry about anything else; even five year old desktop and laptop parts are going to be subjectively similar to new for anything but a narrow range of content creation, gaming or scientific applications (assuming similar amounts of RAM and disk subsystems, that is). Whatever CPU you buy will probably be good enough for the life of the other components in the computer.

It's certainly a hassle to compare between CPUs on differing device types (e.g. is a 15W ULV i7 faster than a four year old 45W mobile i3?) but the truth is that within broad categories, newer things are faster and the classifications hold up. If you're doing an apples to oranges comparison, you have to look at whatever benchmark you think might be most relevant.

Comment: Re:Who makes a premium phone now then (Score 1) 235

by slaker (#49160861) Attached to: Samsung Officially Unpacks Galaxy S6 and Galaxy S6 Edge At MWC

The Galaxy S5 and LG G3 are probably the best fit options.

I carry an S4 and I seldom need to replace the battery, but a few times a year I go to events where I hundreds photos or videos over four or five hours. I probably wind up swapping the battery at least twice on those days. Even if the need is irregular, not having the ability would be a deal breaker for me, too.

Comment: Re:Problem with this scheme (Score 2) 109

by slaker (#49137249) Attached to: Intel To Rebrand Atom Chips Along Lines of Core Processors

Generally speaking, the CPU branding is an indicator of feature set and relative performance within a generation and product class. We have desktop, mobile and (ultra)low-voltage part. If you're getting hung up trying to determine which CPU is faster between two CPUs of wildly different architectures (desktop Sandy Bridge vs. low-voltage Broadwell, for example), it's almost always going to be an apples to oranges comparison anyway; you're probably looking at different classes of devices. Just pay attention to the product class (desktop/mobile/LV) and product generation and the i3/i5/i7 designations will be appropriate.

Comment: Re:While you're at it... (Score 2) 109

by slaker (#49136751) Attached to: Intel To Rebrand Atom Chips Along Lines of Core Processors

Pentium as a brand name has too much consumer good will for Intel to drop it. Remember that Intel Marketing spent 20 years convincing people to buy them. I have met people who bought a Pentium-based notebook rather than a Core i3 specifically because of the Pentium sticker. And current Pentium CPUs certainly aren't bad. They're pretty much i3s without hyperthreading support. They're perfect adequate for light-use machines.

I jokingly tell people that Celeron is an ancient geek word that means "Don't Buy Me", but the fact that they continue to exist is mostly a statement to the levels of ignorance present in the computer-buying public.

Comment: Re:Problem with this scheme (Score 1) 109

by slaker (#49136637) Attached to: Intel To Rebrand Atom Chips Along Lines of Core Processors

On a per-core basis, a Haswell i3 is significantly faster than an i7-920, but the extra threads and dynamic overclocking in the i7 feature set make up for it. In day to day computing, the two are probably about equivalent. For thread intensive tasks like video encoding, the i7 is still the better option. Which just shows how completely insane i7s are, to remain competitive with mainstream desktop CPUs FIVE YEARS after their launch date.

Comment: Re:Son don't try Aptoid (Score 1) 118

by slaker (#49090645) Attached to: New Android Trojan Fakes Device Shut Down, Spies On Users

You can get about 85% functionality from loading four specific APKs to get some Google apps on a FireOS device. You can also root it and load the full suite at the cost of your warranty. But some apps sourced from the Play store use Google components that won't work without Google licensing even if they themselves are not products of Google.

Many Android devs simply don't publish their apps on Amazon. I'm not a mobile dev, so I don't know why that's a problem, but it is.

You can tell people not to use third party stores, but there's a greater problem when the first-party option is completely off the table and the second best and universally compatible choice is wholly inadequate.

Comment: Re:AVG: People still use it? (Score 1) 118

by slaker (#49088799) Attached to: New Android Trojan Fakes Device Shut Down, Spies On Users

MBAM does have an AV module in its paid product, but I think you're not making a distinction between anti-malware and anti-virus applications.The two things are distinct and primarily differentiated by whether or not the software in question tries to spread itself to other files or computers. I agree that anti-malware is much more important because it is much more commonplace, and in my experience there is no single tool that is actually worthwhile for both types of protection, but Windows machines do need both and are best served with best of breed protection from multiple products rather than a single tool that might only really offer worthwhile protection from one side or the other.

I'll also say that Spybot Search and Destroy offers a much more comprehensive array of malware blocking tools when compared to Spywareblaster and it should probably also be in your tool belt.

Comment: Re:Some LiveCDs ... Re:AVG: People still use it? (Score 1) 118

by slaker (#49088745) Attached to: New Android Trojan Fakes Device Shut Down, Spies On Users

I think the MVPS.org hosts file is a good idea for everyone on every device, but anyone using Windows 8+ should know that if the Windows Defender Service is enabled (and I've seen system updates re-enable it), Windows 8 will ignore the content of your hosts file.

My standard protection list is: Adblock+ with Easylist, Malware Domains and Fanboy's Annoyances subs (I also use Warning removal and turn off unobtrusive ads) for every browser on every user account. I actually impregnate the default user account on whatever desktop OS to make sure every account gets CREATED with those options turned on for Mozilla and Google browsers.

Adblock+ for IE doesn't have all those options, but as of version 1.3 at least unobtrusive ads can be turned off. IE does support TPLs, so in an AD environment I mandate the Easylist TPL for basic ad blocking, even if the user disables other ad blocking tools.

On Windows machines that don't have some kind of security appliance or web filtering in place, I also install Spybot Search and Destroy for its Immunization function.

I'll also throw Malwarebytes on absolutely everything and I urge end users to avoid installation of Java and Adobe Acrobat Reader as much as humanly possible. On systems that I maintain, I have a script that adds a scheduled task to install Chocolatey.org's repo + scripts to update browsers, flash, PDF reader et al on Windows machines.

With your bare hands?!?

Working...