Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).


Comment: Re:They don't have the funds for that also that pa (Score 2) 226

by siddesu (#49352213) Attached to: Russian Official Proposes Road That Could Connect London To NYC

It was NOT Russia who began a Donbass war.

Yes, it was Russia. The war in Eastern Ukraine was started by a Mr. Igor Girkin, a Russian, allegedly ex-military, a war criminal from the Yugoslavia wars, who also participated in several of Russia's armed conflicts (Chechnya, Georgia, etc.), and who entered into Ukraine across a Russian border, on orders from Russia.

He had done the same thing just two months before that, in Crimea. The only difference between his first and second marches was the changed attitude of the international community, which made Putin reconsider and change his plans.

Along with him came a group of Russian soldiers and officers, allegedly 'on leave' and a lot of serious firepower: large guns, tanks, armored vehicles. The Russian regime has tried to deny this, but the evidence that a huge amount of Russian military equipment and military are pouring through the border is overwhelming, the confessions of Girkin notwithstanding.

Girkin's activities in Crimea and Eastern Ukraine were financed with Russian money, partly by a Mr. Malofeev, a Russian oligarch with ties to the regime, who got his initial capital from state banks.

Mr. Girkin himself addressed your theory about this non-existing local Russian movement long ago. Here are the relevant quotes from his interview in the Zavtra newspaper:

Q: What about the phases of war: A: At first, nobody [neither Ukraine's armed forces nor the separatists] wanted to fight. The first weeks went with the two sides talking to each other, trying to get the other side to change views. In Slovyansk, the separatists and the army were very careful using arms... The Ukrainian army wasn't eager to fight at all.

Q: Your role wasn't only military, you were the source of ideas for establishing a government, right? A: At the time, I understood well that the [regions of] Donetsk and Lohansk can't fight on their own. We went in with the understanding that the Crimea situation will be repeated, and the Russian army will enter [openly]... My task there was not to take the power, my task was to guard the [separatist] republic

Still, it was me who squeezed the trigger of war. If our team hasn't crossed the border [to go into Ukraine], it would have ended like it did in Kharkiv or Odessa, a few people shot, burned or imprisoned. It would have stopped there. The pendulum of war, which is still going was released by us.

Comment: Re:They don't have the funds for that also that pa (Score 1) 226

by siddesu (#49347619) Attached to: Russian Official Proposes Road That Could Connect London To NYC

in these cases it is less about due process and rule of law and more about a shift in power between rival factions

Not quite, there is a nuance, at least on some levels.

In China, corruption scandals are a tool of power redistribution, because China still has a collective system of government and public opinion matters, albeit not quite like it does in the West. Hence, a systematic corruption fighter is a nuisance, but not an enemy of the state by definition, at least on the face of it.

In Russia, things have gone the other way, towards a very authoritarian regime where the system is based on shameless corruption, by design. Speaking against corruption there is speaking against the system and hence a crime against the 'stability', the Motherland and the 'Russian world', all synthesized in the image of the all-powerful, America-crushing superhero Putin, who provides 'order' and helps the country to 'rise from its knees', where it was put by its eternal enemies -- the evil jews and the Americans -- in the early 90s.

Therefore the institutions of the state (and sources of corruption), the state media and the 'public' opinion are always by definition against the corruption fighter. The latter isn't the occasionally useful nuisance, but an outright enemy that has to be destroyed. Of course, as an enemy, he/she's also in league with the 'foreign enemies' and is on their payroll and so a traitor.

Hence the GP's comment about not wanting a 'revolution' -- the fight against the state of corruption is presented (and apparently perceived by many) as a threat to the government and the order, and this line of thinking has gained a significant traction in Russia, at least on the surface.

We'll see how it will survive the economic hardships that Russia unleashed on itself starting the war in Ukraine.

+ - US Threatened Germany Over Snowden, Vice Chancellor Says->

Submitted by siddesu
siddesu (698447) writes "German Vice Chancellor Sigmar Gabriel (above) said this week in Homburg that the U.S. government threatened to cease sharing intelligence with Germany if Berlin offered asylum to NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden or otherwise arranged for him to travel to that country. “They told us they would stop notifying us of plots and other intelligence matters,” Gabriel said."
Link to Original Source

+ - No fuel in the Fukushima1 reactor #1->

Submitted by Anonymous Coward
An anonymous reader writes "To nobody's surprise, the Japanese press reports that a new way to look at the inside of one of the Fukushima 1 damaged reactors has shown the fuel is not in place.

Engineers have not been able to develop a machine to directly see the exact location of the molten fuel, hampered by extremely high levels of radiation in and around the reactors, but a new scan technique using muons (details on the method in the media are missing) have shown the fuel is not in its place.

While Tepco's speculation is that the fuel may be at the bottom of the reactor, it is a safe bet that at least some of it has burned through and has gone on to create an Uruguay syndrom."

Link to Original Source

Comment: Re:Watches (Score 1) 141

by siddesu (#49125325) Attached to: Pebble Time Smartwatch Receives Overwhelming Support On Kickstarter

Why we ever moved from pocket watches to wrist watches is a mystery to me.

Apparently, they were needed by pilots in the early era of flight. They needed to keep track of time, and at the same time they had to control the aircraft, which, at the time, was a hard physical work. So, wrist watches became a necessity, then cool, then a fashion item.

My intro to aerodynamics book told a story similar to this one:

Comment: Re: Umm... Lulz.... (Score 1) 253

by siddesu (#49109601) Attached to: Will Greek Finance Minister Varoufakis Support Cryptocurrency In Greece?

Call me EU-biased, populist, fourth Reich apologist or whatever, but I don't see how the Euro has been bad for Belgium by looking at its GDP growth. It isn't spectacularly different before/after the Euro, but it seems there is a lot more economic stability after than before.


Before Euro:

After Euro:

As for France, the tendency of diminishing growth has been there since at least the oil shocks, nothing in the chart I see that would point to the introduction of the Euro as the culprit.

Comment: Re:Why? (Score 1) 253

by siddesu (#49106575) Attached to: Will Greek Finance Minister Varoufakis Support Cryptocurrency In Greece?

I want to see how a "financially independent" Greece does, really, except it won't be pretty. If the historical record is any indication, they'll be the third-poorest Balkan nation, ahead of maybe Macedonia and Albania but behind everybody else, with a GDP per capita at a healthy 15-20% of the EU-12 average and an economic growth in the low 50 points of one percent when times are exceptionally good.

Unless they have another coup d'etat or, maybe, get bought wholesale by Istanbul or Moscow with all the expectations of good government that such a deal implies.

In Nature there are neither rewards nor punishments, there are consequences. -- R.G. Ingersoll