The results from random chance would be 50%. They got 53%. Not a statistical significance at all.
You fail statistics. 53% can be significant with a large enough sample size.
Ahem. Remember that you have to account for the Bayseian Filter in front of the sensor.
It's not a "Bayseian filter" [sic], it's a Bayer matrix.
Offtopic: I can't reply to the Racist Facial thread - all the Reply buttons are missing in both Camino and Firefox, and obviously I can post this thread. What gives?
You must not be of Slashdot's preferred race...
the wars between the Cybernetics and the Bio-Engineered would be fierce.
And highly entertaining to the spectators!
We already saw that in Star Wars... clones vs droids. It was a snoozer.
Breadth-first search is the bulldozer of science. -- Randy Goebel