Make your comparisons with the constant on the left side of the comparison operator...that way you can't accidentally put = where == should be because the compiler won't compile 0 = foo but will compile 0 == foo. Surprised you haven't heard of that one before...doesn't handle all cases but it does handle 95% of them. In 20 years of professional programming I've never made the dreaded = instead of == mistake because of that simple idiom.
Farm animals are not much better off than if they were in the wild. Sure, they get food, but they are slaughtered as soon as they reach full size. Dairy cows might have it a little better, depending on your point of view, but most of their babies certainly don't have it better.
What is animal abuse? Going by what gets media and court attention, it seems like the definition of animal abuse in America is treating dogs and cats as farm animals.
I'm not sure you understand what a dairy cow actually is from your post. You seem to be confusing dairy and beef cows which are completely different breeds, literally. A dairy cow isn't slaughtered for meat unless its diseased and going to be made into dog food. In that case, euthanasia is actually the most humane treatment (a short quick death instead of a long suffering death). And the female babies become dairy cows...the male babies become studs (a better life is hard to imagine) or veal. This mimics how cow herds actually work in the wild with females being preserved and males in a feast or famine situation. Generally a dairy cow has a pretty good life, the beef cows, not so much.
As someone who grew up on a farm, one of the biggest complaints I have about PETA (and their ilk) is that they seem to know nothing about how agriculture actually works but are very eager to change farming. This is a bit like putting hair dressers in charge of IT in your company. They are great at getting attention, as to producing the desired results, not so much...
The blockchain is nothing more than a transaction record. It doesn't "enable" anything.
Bitcoin (and all blockchain tech) solves the Byzantine Generals Problem which is a classic problem of computer science. It means you can create distributed exchanges of virtual or real property in the face of people trying to lie, cheat, or steal. Its actually a pretty big achievement. There are distributed market places, distributed exchanges and other interesting developments in the works all based on the fact that we can now build software on top of blockchains. But please continue to tell us how Bitcoin doesn't enable anything and whatever DB table you (or your bank) use to store transactions is more secure than that.
It wasn't foresight; same as for the EPA, labor laws, OSHA,
Wow. For you Tea Baggists - oh, I'm sorry, "Libertarians" - it always comes back to the EPA and OSHA...
He isn't saying there shouldn't be an EPA or OSHA, he's saying that people had problems then came up with the regulatory solution (ie creating the EPA). WTF are you responding to? I don't even think the GP is a tea partier.
PS I'm a Democrat, not trusting the FED (which is a rational position if you know its history) isn't the same as being a Tea Party member. Its just one issue out of many and one that quiet a few Occupiers would agree with (well the ones that know what the FED is anyway). Now go troll elsewhere.
I had *no* fiscal support from my family for MIT: I was an emancipated minor at 16. Most of my peers worked their *asses* off to make ends meet. MIT is *filled* with people whose parents didn't or couldn't fund their full costs: they have a "needs blind" admission program that is very helpful to kids, and families, who struggle with the costs.
So you can take your jealousy and put it somewhere else.
CMU is much the same way. No legacy admissions and grants and scholarships are entirely need based and not an honor (like say the Rhodes Scholarship is). Keep in mind that this for the CS departments, other schools in the universities are a bit different.
It's just sad that we rely on pieces of paper to 'prove' our worth, even when most of the people with pieces of paper don't know what they're doing (Most of the people without don't either.). It's also sad that you need to waste your time in rote memorization facilities in order to get scholarships. It's just a huge waste of time and effort.
You know what you are? Bitter.
I would be bitter too if I got rejected just because I didn't have a certain piece of paper. That's illogical garbage.
But being "bitter" doesn't debunk his little rant. But yeah, I don't see why he would decline to hire someone just because they're rich; it seems like the same sort of petty nonsense that leads to employers not hiring people because they're lacking pieces of paper.
Clearly written by someone who never was at one of these top CS schools. I assure you that rote memorization won't get you a degree at any of them. Most of my tests at CMU were open book and open note and I can count on 1 hand how many times I used my textbook or notes during a test. Why? Because the tests weren't rote memorization tests but instead tested for your ability to synthesize what you learned and apply it to a domain you might not have ever considered. One question on my OS final was to write a device driver for an optical disk, with a pencil and paper (no compiler or debugger) in valid C. Rote memorization won't help you there. Quit being bitter and ignorant about educational experiences you haven't had. Perhaps there is a reason all the CS profs come from MIT, Berkeley and CMU...
PS Berkeley graduates about 4X the CS major as MIT and CMU combined. Not sure the author considered this in their analysis...good engineers are supposed to see this type of omission. Guess CIOs aren't...
When I went to job interviews (though it has been years), I made it a point to dress up in the 'worst' clothes I had. I'd go into job interviews with casual clothes that would have stains and rips in them. The idea is that I don't want to work with shallow people. I'm simply choosing my own company, and I don't want to hang around people that are irrational and shallow if I can help it, you see.
Again, this is a free world (for a little while longer anyways). That is your choice. I know people who did that same thing except they did it in order to flunk the interview so they could meet their job search requirements and keep drawing their unemployment checks while working under the table on the side.
This right there is why you didn't get a job with a software firm and ended up in IT instead. It might be a symptom of you not getting into one of these top CS schools in that when you are at such an university, you are surrounded by people who are as smart or smarter than you (perhaps for the first time in your life) and you realize really quickly that first impressions and looks are very likely to fool you when dealing with such people. You learn to look a bit deeper and you learn that a term like "smart" can take on many forms. Some people are better communicators, some are better engineers, some are better at abstract logic and some are more pragmatic folks that always make sound decisions. And how they dress rarely will tell you which someone is. So you learn to filter those factors and look deeper. Something you clearly never learned to do. And putting someone like you in a quality engineering team can be like throwing a wrench into a clock's gears. That's why you ended up where you did and no other reason. I've worked with people in the software field without CS degrees and with degrees from "lesser" schools. Your authoritarian attitude toward others is why you are barred from software firms, thank his noodley goodness.
Nice federal income tax revenue from California you have there, United States. Would be a shame if something were to happen to it.
This is a game that can be played both ways.
Its actually worse than that. If you remove CA from the US economy, what do you think the jobs/GDP/other national growth metrics for the rest of the US look like over the last 30 years? Can you say perpetual depression? Removing CA from the US would be disastrous, for the other 49 states. Don't kid yourself about the size of the CA economy, its large and growing, unlike the most of the rest of the US. Oh, and we actually pay off our debts. You really think politicians from other states would want to have to explain those numbers to the voters?
potheads were worthless burnouts who will never amount to anything?
Considering I've never heard directly of anyone in this industry using it, I think the stereotype is correct. Personally I didn't see it in college (BS in Comp Sci in 1989) nor have I seen it in the twenty-five years since. Pot use just doesn't happen in this industry.
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha, I hope that was sarcasm...
Dear Barman, Can you please explain the "insult" shopkeepers?
Early elevators weren't exactly safe. That didn't stop people from using them.
Yes it did. The thing that made elevators a success was a safety demonstration at the 1854 worlds fair. The guy who invented the safety break for the elevator Elisha Otis became the biggest maker of elevators (which is why you see the name Otis in many elevators even today). The maker who won was not the guy who first made a elevator, it was the first guy who could prove an elevator was safe.
You know every time someone pushes something as hard as the cloud gets pushed, there is something worth knowing that they aren't telling you. In this case, its that the cloud will probably cost you more as you need 4x the number of "cloud servers" to handle the I/O load of your production servers. But hey, at least 'the cloud' sounds really cool.
There is the issue of certain services being 'natural monopolies'. How many power companies do you want running power lines to your home in order to offer you power service? Network companies running fiber, cable, or coax to offer you the Internet? Water? Sewer?
See, when something requires the customer to receive not just the service but also build infrastructure through other people's property to deliver it to them, most people realize that allowing many companies to build that infrastructure is a disruptive pain. Since we don't have the core infrastructure built so that such cables can be laid without disrupting someone else's property, the trade-off has been a limited number of contenders in an area. You can argue whether that's right or not, or if there are better ways, but that is what the compromise was in order to allow for the service and yet not be a disruption.
Personally, I see local infrastructure like power lines, fiber, coax, cable, etc as just like roads. Who maintains your roads? Anyone that provides a service using those roads can do so without disruption, and the entity that owns them maintains them and permits access. They generally have no vested interest in extorting excess money out of the users of those roads, but do charge them for use. Other aspects of our infrastructure could be similarly maintained and we would solve the 'local monopoly' issue while minimizing disruption.
So make all ISPs utilities then (most of them built their lines on the gov't dime). Oh wait, you don't want that as then you wouldn't be paided to shill for them anymore. Tough shit, get a real job parasite.
The average American doesn't even spent $30,000 on a car, so the price range of these new vehicles is still in the realm of the rich for toys and games.
The average price of a new car in America is $31,252. A $40,000 vehicle is not remotely out of reach for a large percent of the population.
A Volt is $35K - tax credit ($7.5K to $9K depending on the state). So the actual cost of buying a Volt is less than the average cost of a new car.
Which electric cars don't support Level 1 charging? Not the Leaf, Volt, or Tesla.