As tYou're advocating to what is and is not sexism, correlation and causation. Very simple concepts. Many things correlate with sex but if they are not caused by sex then it is not a gender issue but rather specific to that correlative variable.
You seem to be confused over what "sexism" means. Everyone who is sexist has reasons for it. They believe gender correlates with all sorts of things like rational thought or brainpower. You are advocating disciminating based on gender because you believe it correlates with other things.
And that requires you to be dropping those universal truths.
And what universal truth would that be? I lookforwards to hearing about your hallucination on this one.
This is basic logic.
Dictionary defintions are based on usage, not logic, as language is arbirtary. If you attempt to redefine a word using logic, you are doing nothing but demonstrating your lack of understanding of such.
As to not having the right to not be offended, okay... but that means that neither you nor these women have that right either. Their offense or uncomfortableness with something is therefore irrelevant. This works to my favor again.
I'm at a loss as to where or why you ever brought this up, then. So far all that's happened is you've played the offence card, I called you on it and you somehow now claim this is to your advantage. You seem to be basing that claim on the assumption that I have played the ofence card. Let me assure you that all your "logical" reasoning in the world won't actually work if you don't read the arguments you're responding to.
I am very much more comfortable working in an environment where offense is irrelevant then is your position. Your position will inherently demand rights and concessions from mine on this basis. Since you don't have a right to not be offended anymore, that argument can no longer be used by you.
It wasn't. You know when one is trying to debate something, the logical thing to do is to actually read your opponents argument. Actually scratch that: since you're doing this for entertainment, the logical thing to do is whatver pleases you. So if it pleases you to do so, by all means argue about stuff you've hallucinated that I said.
Do you feel the ratchet tightening?
Not really because your pawl snapped right off.
We'll see if you have any rational rebuttals or if you're just going to fully devolve into meaningless insults.
It's not an insult if it's true.
FYI, when you do that... I win.