Pehaps you have trouble with Context. Is there some rule that I am only allowed to address specific issues from this article in question?
No, you have trouble with context. You posted a bunch of random crap unrelated to the article (according to you) and magically expected me to deduce from the context that it wasn't about the article in question but was instead an off topic rant.
We have been inundated with articles about how STEM (of which engineering is included in as a career) workers are indeed pigs,
No we haven't.
First off, let us speak of reframing as referenced. How is that not changing the overall scope of the work.
It's changing the motivation for the work, not necessarily the work itself.
Because science is about the truth,
This article is about engineering, not science. Engineering is about building stuff. Or is this one of the times I'm meant to deduce from context that you've wandered off topic?
And seriously, if the entire basic nature of STEM has to be radically changed in order to suit a particular group
If *invalid-premise* then *conclusions-void*.
Now stop being an asshat.