Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment: Re:I've been in the business since I was 19 (Score 1) 505

Core was ram wasn't it?

Anyway, I used to do uni teaching about 4 years ago. The practical course I helped run involved programming with a whole 64 actual bytes of RAM (you want k, rich boy?). Rather more modern, but as usual the constraints are about cost and power draw but at the fractions of a cent and nano watt level.

Resource constrained programming hasn't gone away, it's probably bigger now than it ever was, but it's very well hidden.

I think it was a PIC12F675 or maybe a 10F series one. I don't recall precisely.

Of course you get a much faster machine to run the editor, assembled simulator and debugger.

I really came to appreciate those chips. The dedication of the builders to shaving cost and power while making the absolute most of the few transistors they were willing to use is impressive!

Comment: Re:a great euphemism: "anti-discrimination"... (Score 1) 505

Wow you have really brought into newspeak hook line and sinker.

Anti discrimination is not discrimination. In the same way that good is not double plus bad.

Making it illegal to not hire someone for reasons unrelated to job performance, such as skin color, gender and age is not discriminatory, and applies equally to all people.

Comment: Re:She has a point. (Score 1) 608

by serviscope_minor (#49613209) Attached to: My High School CS Homework Is the Centerfold

Well, I believe you are mistaken. It's not a huge gulf it's more or less a smooth continuum.

Do you ever remember giggling around when in a class in which you were very much a minority in some respect, and the giggling around was along the lines of your minority aspect?

If not, your experience is completely irrelevant to this discussion.

Comment: Re:She has a point. (Score 1) 608

by serviscope_minor (#49609643) Attached to: My High School CS Homework Is the Centerfold

So, we have a situation with the following:
1. Teenaged or young adults-a group known for level headedness, quiet confidence and eminently sensible on matters of gender and sexuality.
2. One gender being very much in the minority.
3. The majority gender gathering round to have a giggle over nudie pics.
4.In a professional/educational environment.

If you don't see anything wrong with that picture, then you either have no empathy, have no understanding of people and have entirely forgotten what it was like to be a teenager.

The fact that you brought up the bobbit jokes indicates you simply don't care. It smacks of the attitude "well females did this thing that time, so males get to so something too now". If a bunch of women were doing that kind of thing in an inappropriate environment making a minority guy uncomfortable, then it was a shitty thing to do. Having some guys do the same doesn't even up the score, it just makes the world a worse place.

It also indicates that you view the world in a binary males versus females fashion (why else bring up something females did? ) which is a dumb ass attitude which propagates problems and nothing more.

Comment: Re:She has a point. (Score 1) 608

by serviscope_minor (#49607589) Attached to: My High School CS Homework Is the Centerfold

Oh and guess what? In every single computer vision lab I taught (which was quite a few) someone always went and looked and shared the knowledge with everyone else. So if you have it in a lab you are implicitly expecting everyone to find out.

So yeah it's in pretty poor taste. And you get a bunch of giggling guys all huddled round a computer at some point. Is that a good thing to be happening in a vision lab? Nope.

But what do I know, eh? I only taught a bunch of these so I only have more first hand experience than almost anyone else here.

And like I said in another comment, I get to review papers in cv, so I get to have some small say in how this persists. Guess which direction I go. Bonus points for also jumping to incorrect conclusions.

Comment: Re:Dumb stuff (Score 1) 608

by serviscope_minor (#49607523) Attached to: My High School CS Homework Is the Centerfold

Don't worry, I'm quite brutal. Feature detection papers won't get past me unless they at least have some repeatability experiments not fouled up, or some better or equivalent alternative.

Also argh! I hate the Berkeley segmentation dataset. I know, let's make a low level algorithm try to perform the "same" as humans doing a high level task where each human had to guess what the task was! Mind blowingly bad :(

Comment: Re:Dumb stuff (Score 1) 608

by serviscope_minor (#49606471) Attached to: My High School CS Homework Is the Centerfold

Playboy disclaimed copyright because the image was so ubiquitous by the time they figured out, it was too late.

Still I'm going to quote the BMVA style guide (latex cls file) which uses Lena as an example image with the caption something like "if I never see this image again it will be too soon". While not exactly the official position on the BMVA, it's a common attitude among reviewers.

Personally, when I review papers, while this image won't put it instantly in the discard pile, it generally is a black mark because it's almost always indicative of laziness on the part of the author. There are very, very, VERY few legitimate uses of such an image. Most uses sadly are along the lines of "look at the features we get ", which makes me reply, "where are objective measures such as repeatability and information content or matching score? "

So suck it, MRAs. I get to review papers and you don't, so I get to decide. So there!

Comment: Re:She has a point. (Score 5, Insightful) 608

by serviscope_minor (#49600795) Attached to: My High School CS Homework Is the Centerfold

Hi.

Computer vision scientist here.Yes, I've taught such a practical as a postdoc, so no I had no control over the content. Yes Lena was used. Sooner or later someone figures out where the image is from and everyone, well the guys, all have a good laugh.

So yes it does create a hostile environment. I'm afraid that your armchair logic and reasoning are going to come in second to those who have not only witnessed it, but been a part of the whole thing first hand.

The new guy who took over thankfully changed the images because he rightly realised that Lena was in poor taste and was inviting problems that are very easy to avoid.

I look forward to receiving replies on how my actual real personal experience was somehow wrong.

Comment: Re:Well... (Score 1) 108

by serviscope_minor (#49583691) Attached to: Russian Cargo Spacehip Declared Lost

Never mind a marathon, have you ever watched a near-toddler learning learning to "walk"?

After they manage to reliably lever themselves up on to two feet, they kinda tip forwards and hurtle towards whatever they want to reach at the best speed they can make which is something approaching a dead run (not like an adult sprint, but it's not like an adult walk either).

This usually leads to them crashing into something and falling over, though they generally only cry if an adult can see them.

So, in fact kids pretty much learn to run as the first thing and actually learning an efficient wallk comes a lot later.

And I certainly agree about the marathon (I've only run 13 miles, but the point stands). I used ot take off and get rapidly out of breath. These days I can run 10k cold (having not done any running or indeed exercise in about 3-4 months), mostly because I have learned how to run and pace myself. It took quite a lot of practice and yes, walking didn't help at all.

The clothes have no emperor. -- C.A.R. Hoare, commenting on ADA.

Working...