I'd be happy to - could you post any? Being as "intellectually honest" as you are?
I don't know why you put "intellectually honest" in quotes. I suspect you're accusing me of dishonesty because for some reason pointing out blatant flaws in your reasoning is dishonest.
Well, it's easier to attack the person than it is to attack the argument.
So, since you're happy to be intellectually honest will you go ahead and retract all your claims measured against media pundits rather than scientists?
If you want predictions by actual scientists, you should look at some actual scientific papers or reports.
Of course this is all moving the goal posts, which is another intellectually dishonest tactic. Nonetheless, I'll play ball.
Go to Figure 1.4.
You can see predictions from 1990, 1996 and if you like more recent plotted alongside the actual temperature measurements. As you will see, the predictions match the observations.