Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed


Forgot your password?
Slashdot Deals: Cyber Monday Sale! Courses ranging from coding to project management - all eLearning deals 25% off with coupon code "CYBERMONDAY25". ×
User Journal

Journal Journal: Pet Peeves of the Job Search

- Pushy recruiters with foreign accents so thick you can't understand what they are saying
- Who clearly have not read your resume and only found you on a keyword search
- Who cannot read a map and do not understand "I cannot relocate 500 miles for a temporary job, and in software, all jobs are temporary"

User Journal

Journal Journal: Knowledge Transfer Time 11

What is your favorite Data Modeling Software that interfaces with SQL Server?

It looks like Microsoft has dropped Visio for Enterprise Architects, which is what I used the last time I had to do a massive knowledge transfer of a data heavy application.

User Journal

Journal Journal: Back to coding, doing something I haven't done before 6

Does anybody know of a good Javascript, .NET, or HTML5 (or combination of the three) library for doing a user-customizable widget grid?

I've seen it done enough that this *should* be a readily available control, but I don't seem to be able to find one with my first three rounds of google searching, I'm probably calling it the wrong thing.

What I want is to be able to configure a user's home page on the website with their choice & order of several widgets.

Anybody know of a great tool for doing this? Worst case scenario is I roll my own with a three column table built up from a sub table off of the users.

Oh yeah, and mandatory technology for this project is SQL Server Database, Visual Studio .NET Webforms (yeah, after doing MVC the last 4 projects I'm thinking Yuck too with these code-behinds), intended for HTML5 browsers.

User Journal

Journal Journal: A

A reddit comment inspired a bit of an interesting thought.

The question is. If you had a fast TM (FAST_TM) with a little bit of paper tape, and a slow TM (SLOW_TM) with a lot of paper tape, could you simulate FAST_TM on SLOW_TM? Could you trade off memory for speed to get a (close to realtime even) representation of FAST_TM on SLOW_TM?

I think this gets interesting if you ask for a SLOW_TM to have with an infinite ( |â| ) paper tape. As long as you could 'read state' into those tape cells fast enough you could have stories of state going back as far back as the FAST_TM has not been in a stable/idle state. In an idle state you could start to play catchup. Between idle state points you would be at some indeterminate point between where the last idle state was that you could play catch up, in effect you'll probably have a whole stack of possible state points(what is the computational complexity of catching up on this stack for the size of the stack STACKSIZE?). So the load % of FAST_TM would determine the average lag time between your successful modelling of it.

This suggests that you could probably get a probablistic chance of modelling the FAST_TM by just adding memory of (O(S)+O(T))t where S is the memory required to record one state, t is the time and O(T) is the amount of memory you spend transitioning from state to state. I'm guessing this would be hard to do so on cpus with little memory involved, ie there's a high constant factor, but once you're past this constant factor it gets relatively easy to do...but then again maybe it doesn't? I think the lower bounds for turing machines of certain memory capability in terms of size are very small and we haven't got a lot of proofs for them.

Now here's an idea for a new kind of machine: a FAST_TM simulated on a new kind of SLOW_TM, ie where SLOW_TM has a bounded amount of memory proportional to some % of possible outcomes. Let's call this SIM_TM_LB. SIM_TM_LB is going to have a lower busy beaver-like number than a regular TM of its size because there's a certain % of possible outcomes that cannot be simulated (that overflow the stack allowed). going to be some lower limit L 1 L(M) BB(M) that the largest program available on simulated-fast-cpu can run. Proving what that is would be interesting because as you expand M (again in relation to the load average ratio between the two, the state transition memory footprint T, and the FAST_TM state size S) you're also define a L(M) BB(M) which means you're defining a new kind of number let's say Î that seems to be related to \omega: it's \phi = \sigma_i 1/L(i). Why is Î important?

It's yet another way of looking at problems where you're dealing with something smarter than you are. It's where you're playing a game with god. Where you're having an argument with an oracle. It expresses all information that you can possibly acquire rather than what your opponent can possibly know. Or does it?

This suggest \psi s parameters are T and S. Are there any others?

Also: what happens if we start allowing stack overflows to transverse from TM to TM? This seems to build a new kind of machine, also that has potentially really weird properties.

User Journal

Journal Journal: When did I become an incompetent at TSQL? 32

What is wrong with this code? It's like I can have the inner loop execute, or the outer loop execute, but not both.

DECLARE @BatchMatch varchar(40)
Declare @mcount int
Declare @dcount int
Set @mcount=1
Set @dcount=1
While @mcount <13
        while @dcount<32
                Set @BatchMatch=Right('00'+Convert(varchar(2), @mcount),2) + Right('00' + Convert(varchar(2),@dcount),2)
                Print @BatchMatch
                Set @dcount=@dcount+1
        Set @mcount=@mcount +1

PS, no I don't care that all months don't have 31 days, but I must cover months that do.

Update- failed to reset the inner loop counter, that's what.

User Journal

Journal Journal: The Stupid Fallacy 1

Prerequisites :

The Stupid Fallacy (named/discovered by Chris Rileyâ) Is-A Argument from Ignorance that includes an extra component:

Instead of merely being an argument that draws a conclusion from the *lack* of knowledge on a topic (and not in a bayesian-friendly way of enumerating possibilities and going from there, either) you have

  • (optional) empty platitudes that stand as non-truth functional filler in place of where premises would normally go followed by
  • a statement that is so utterly wrong and against nature/reason/good sense, that it's fractally wrong, and decompressing the argument against it would overflow any reasonable wanabe bayesian's attempt at both responding and adjusting their priors.

Why don't you like GMOs?

Who knows what chemicles they put in GMOs! They're probably dangerous! Besides, God tells me to not let my precious bodily fluids become tainted by GMOs. You have to believe me because my beliefs are not subject to logical fallacies, since you and I are both christians[1].

Why is this worth keeping around?

Because it's not just ignorance. It's recursive, or close to recursive ignorance. It's ignorance that requires disproportionate amounts of cognitive surplus available to dispel. You have to basically reconstruct an entire worldview relying on evidence rather than 'feelings' or 'blind belief in what my elders said' in order to get your point across.

[1] no really.

User Journal

Journal Journal: Clearly I suck 4

My linux skills have atrophied. I need to set up 10 workstations today. I have one done. What is the *easiest* way to clone a partition in ubuntu 14?
Update: Ghost 4 Linux and LinuxLive USB Creator to the rescue. I haven't had a usable copy of Ghost since floppies ruled the emergency boot sector, now, I'm going to buy a 32GB keychain drive off of Amazon and make sure I am NEVER without a copy of G4L. Drive imaging in an emergency is just way too useful of a skill to have.

User Journal

Journal Journal: Am I human? 4

According to slashdot, apparently not. I keep getting "You have failed to confirm you are a human"

User Journal

Journal Journal: Strange SQL Server 2014 behavior 7

I have a Select Statement that returns 4 rows. When used in a stored procedure as input to an Insert Into, though, it was returning five rows. I commented out SET NOCOUNT ON; which is added by the SQL 2014 template. It then returned 4 rows. To test that was what was really going on, I uncommented out SET NOCOUNT ON; and it is now returning 4 rows properly.

I made no other changes.

Anybody else ever run into anything like this??

We're living in a golden age. All you need is gold. -- D.W. Robertson.