What's the counterexample again? That Apple users are renegades who know a thing or two?
And you can always explain away any attacks of conscience by claiming you simply want everyone to be personally responsible for themselves, even as your policies take away the means to do so from the majority of people.
I wish I'd written that.
It's sort of like claiming your view represents the majority while trying to disenfranchise hundreds of thousands of legal voters.
Are you saying Apple users are not sheep?
nope, not accurate. all he was saying was "I like apple products for these reasons. inb4 n00b".
In that case, his self-identification as a computer tech who knows a thing or two was not only fallacious, but also superfluous.
Well, to be fair, each of those 14,000 were aiming at their own penis. The fact that they hit their forehead instead is just a testament to their ability to aim.
Semi-automatic just means more bullets less time. Which is something you want if you're going to shoot off your penis.
If you don't know that, then you don't know Wikipedia.
You're a ridiculous, abject moron.
For the record, the ad-hominem in question was calling Marlin's integrity, intent, and legitimacy into question as your justification for calling his position and opinion unviable and of no value.
Please quote the part of my original comment where I did any of that or even implied any of that.. Otherwise, you may just be full of it.
You forgot to include the "...but" in boldface. So, you actually missed the fallacy.
Next time you want tot ake a dick pic, imagine that the pic ened up being posted on a gay porn web site.
Gosh, I'd be honored.
n a similar way, around here they are trying to promote the annual flu shot.
You get a free Klondike Bar with your flu shot.
I hear they're bringing them shots right out to the trailer park now. The whole Cuyler clan got them shots, except Early, who said it was all a plot and no goddamn body's gonna give him any flu shot because he don't wanna catch the autism.
BUT I will say with a company a person can quit or stop purchasing the companies products.
Unless you happen to want to connect to the Internet and you hate the one company in your location that offers broadband connectivity. Oligopolies are the order of the day.
I understand the Ronald Legacy Project has preserved every pair of Depends that Ronald Reagan crapped in during his final two years in office. They'll never forget Reagan (which is more than Ronald Reagan could have said during his last two years in the White House, which, according to testimony to the commitUtee investigating Iran-Contra, he didn't remember a bit. I tended to believe him.).
I just want to point out that all of your citations are from before the enrollment deadline. I think your latest post was from April.
How about something a little more recent?
In fact, if you follow the website attacks on Obamacare based on the number of people enrolled, you will find a deluge of articles leading up to April of 2014 and then...silence. You'll still find other attacks, but none based on the number of newly enrolled. Then, in May, you see a lot of articles saying, "Well, OK, a lot of people enrolled, but how many actually paid?". And then, based on insurance company data, it turned out that the people signing up for exchanges actually paid at a higher rate than the general population signing up for health insurance.
There are good reasons to criticize the ACA, but the number of people who have gotten coverage for the first time because of the law is not one of them.
Why do your figures leave out the increases before the ACA was passed?