ROFL you say they aren't accurate, but they are more accurate than the land based data sets because the data hasn't be tweaked six ways from Sunday to make things appear warmer.
I am a strident skeptic, but am interested in your statement that warming will reduce Arctic Ice while increasing antarctic ice. Do you have a link that could explain that to me?
Lol what about the supporters of AGW -- everyone ignores that none -- that is correct 0% of their predictions have come true.
No, not really
Yes the raw data is available, and the raw satellite data shows no warming for the last 17 years. GISS has been proven again and again to have been adjusted so that the past appears cooler and the present appears warmer. So when the OP says that raw data disproves this what he links to is not raw data, it is the data adjusted by GISS programs.
You do realize that in the book any kind of civil service qualified you for citizenship. They even went so fast as to try and discourage people from the military side ox service.
You are both wrong. Current government income is at or close to an all time high. We aren't broke, we just are spending too much. And look at the times when the high bracket tax rates were higher -- revenue was down. Raising taxes only increases revenue for a year or two at the end of which people have adjusted their actions to the new rates to avoid payments.
Modern unions have outlived their usefulness. I agree there was worker mistreatment at the hands of employers, and if that kind of mistreatment returns, then bring back the unions. Currently they are just leeches sucking the lifeblood out of the workers they are supposedly in place to protect.
you are foolish if you think just in terms of pump price. Look at the average wage for unskilled labor in North Dakota. This boombis not just affecting a few.
First Aid of all that is the job of the House of Representatives. According to the constitution authority to spend MUST originate in the house. If the shoe was on the other foot and a Republican Senate and President had passed a law that say authorized the FBI to actively prosecute abotion doctors wouldn't you want the democratically controlled house to shut down the government to prevent enactment of that law?
Second, the house is passing funding bills that say nothing about Obamacare. Bills to fund the parks department and the NIS. But the democrats refuse to even consider these, because they want the public to suffer through the shutdown. Because they feel the Republicans will suffer more backlash than they will.
Funny. I feel that environmental issues is political speak for putting money into pork projects like Solyndra.
Note from TFA that the disagreement that Senator Cruz had with the bill was that he and the House supported the version of the bill that said that the money from Helium sales should go to defecit reduction and the bill that passed that he voted against had the money going for national parks and "environmental issues."
That's a fallacy. It means that those people who aren't courteous enough (bad guys) to be polite for the right reasons will be polite because they have to be.
Since everything else seems to have gone in the shitter, I come back to you with a message that seemed to sell well in both campaigns: the environment.
I look forward to again gaining your broad support with a campaign of platitudes, anthemic one-word slogans, and statements that make me appear sympathetic to your issues, while actually resulting in policies that either ossify the current corporation-based lobbyist-driven structure, or expand the pervasive control of the Federal government ostensibly for good reasons but which will in fact be used to incrementally decrease your rights vis a vis that "Constitution" thingy, which I will continue to re-interpret as really not relevant to today's realities anyway.