Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).


Comment: Fighting yesterday's battles (Score -1) 391

by roman_mir (#49364667) Attached to: Why the Final Moments Inside a Cockpit Are Heard But Not Seen

We are all pretty good at fighting yesterday's battles. This happened in Europe, but in the USA there was time people could fly with only a ticket and not any ID, they could bring their guns with them too. Now you cannot have a gun, the cockpits are locked with farely strong doors because everybody is scared of terrorists, they didn't even have an axe on board, just a crowbar. Apparently the captain tried breaking the door with a crowbar, I wonder if he tried breaking the wall beside the door. Flying is completely fucked up, TSA harasses you and then you don't know if a psychotic pilot will kill you anyway.

How about TRYING FREEDOM for a change? Bring your ticket, allow people to take their guns with them and keep axes on board while removing insane cockpit doors?

Sure, everything can still go wrong, at least you are not just a sardin in a can, hoping not to be eaten this time around.

Comment: Dictated 'culture' is not culture. (Score 1) 234

This is more government bullshit, you cannot dictate or decree culture, if you are doing that then what you are doing is you are actually destroying what the real culture is to impose your own version of it and I cannot imagine that can work in real life and be an actual substitute for actual culture.

You cannot force people to like things you like, you cannot force people to enjoy things you enjoy. You can make people HATE things you hate in some cases by pretending that thing being a threat, that's how dictators operate (including elected dictators).

This is a bullshit money grabbing measure, nothing else.

Comment: All your base... (Score -1, Offtopic) 68

by roman_mir (#49350477) Attached to: PayPal To Pay $7.7 Million For Sanctions Violations


America, FUCK YEAH!

Coming again, to save the mother fucking day yeah,
America, FUCK YEAH!

Freedom is the only way yeah,
Terrorists your game is through cause now you have to answer too,
America, FUCK YEAH!

So lick my butt, and suck on my balls,
America, FUCK YEAH!
What you going to do when we come for you now,
itâ(TM)s the dream that we all share; itâ(TM)s the hope for tomorrow


McDonalds, FUCK YEAH!
Wal-Mart, FUCK YEAH!
Baseball, FUCK YEAH!
Rock and roll, FUCK YEAH!
The Internet, FUCK YEAH!
Slavery, FUCK YEAH!


Starbucks, FUCK YEAH!
Disney world, FUCK YEAH!
Valium, FUCK YEAH!
Reeboks, FUCK YEAH!
Fake Tits, FUCK YEAH!
Taco Bell, FUCK YEAH!
Rodeos, FUCK YEAH!
Bed Bath And Beyond (fuck yeah?, fuck yeah)

Liberty, FUCK YEAH!
White Slips, FUCK YEAH!
The Alamo, FUCK YEAH!
Band-aids, FUCK YEAH!
Las Vegas, FUCK YEAH!
Christmas, FUCK YEAH!
Immigrants, FUCK YEAH!
Popeye, FUCK YEAH!
Democrats, FUCK YEAH!
Republicans (.....fuck yeah, ....fuck yeah)
Sportsmanship, (....)
Books, (......)

Comment: Re:Ban teachers union (Score 0) 213

by roman_mir (#49317763) Attached to: Finland's Education System Supersedes "Subjects" With "Topics"

It's interesting how freedom of association can be applied very selectively. Sure, union members are associating with each other supposedly freely, but if a shop is a closed union shop you can't get a job there without being 'freely associated' and if a union is established the employer in many cases cannot avoid having to 'associate with it' (well, employer can shut down the shop and move on, which sometimes happens and for a good reason).

Comment: Re:Too Big to Nail (Score 0) 121

by roman_mir (#49314925) Attached to: FTC's Internal Memo On Google Teaches Companies a Terrible Lesson

Not only are you a thief, angry when somebody you want to steal from doesnt let you take everything you have your sights on, you are also ignorant. Free market means one singular thing: free from violent oppression of the State (and thus the mob, thieves just like you), nothing else. Cartels? No problem with anything like that at all. Now, government cartels, who have legislative and enforcement power - that is the only actual problem. Government using its violence to pander to thieves (like you) and selling that oppression during elections, that is the problem. Good news in all of this - the bubble in currency and debt inflated by governments spilled over into a bubble of government itself. When this one implodes, it will take everything with it, most importantly the governments themselves. Thieves (like you) all of a sudden will have to do your own bidding with your own hands and since you are used to all the stealing to be done for you by governments, you will have to relearn even that skill. And it is easier for individuals to deal with individual thieves and robbers than with a system devised to wteal and rob institutionally.

Comment: Re:just stick to real water (Score 0) 417

by roman_mir (#49314095) Attached to: How 'Virtual Water' Can Help Ease California's Drought

Oh, what absolute pleasure it would be to see a real fight between those, regarding themselves as 'liberal' (in the USA understanding of the word) and 'conservative' (in the same USA context). I am talking about a real fight, civil war type of scenario, where you have no choice but to take a side and go at it with everything you've got. That's the way of the future it looks like, let's make it fun.

Comment: Re:This is why markets are not a good model for go (Score 1) 121

by roman_mir (#49313891) Attached to: FTC's Internal Memo On Google Teaches Companies a Terrible Lesson

Wrong, it's the governments (of the world actually) that do not value unalienable rights. That is the only reason USA used to be known as unique, it had those rights built into the Constitution and then eventually as those rights allowed the markets to create the wealthiest economy in the world in 19th century, the collectivists saw that as an opportunity to steal and pushed for destruction of what made USA unique - protecting those rights.

Markets value what individuals value on voluntary basis and individuals on voluntary basis making individual choices do value their own freedom to possess and operate private property. That's the most important right that governments of the world violate every minute of every day.

AFAIC it is absolutely Google's business and nobody else's how they provide results to the search queries sent to their servers. Governments involving themselves into that process is destruction of the unalienable rights, destruction of private property rights, just like all business regulations, all income and wealth related taxes, pretty much everything governments do every moment of every day.

Comment: Re:Too Big to Nail (Score -1) 121

by roman_mir (#49313863) Attached to: FTC's Internal Memo On Google Teaches Companies a Terrible Lesson

Ah, one of those, who believes that if he did not steal enough from somebody today then he didn't have a good day and that the individual (or company) he didn't steal enough from today got away with something. Mmmm, the thievery is strong with this one.

Government destroys the free market with every step it takes, it's time for governments to die.

Comment: A callback needs to be mandatory to change account (Score 1) 70

by roman_mir (#49306151) Attached to: GoDaddy Accounts Vulnerable To Social Engineering (and Photoshop)

While it's cool to shit on GoDaddy here, it is not only that company that can fall to this type of an attack. They have to implement better security features themselves rather than just trying to sell their own version of 'security' to their customers (extra $$$ for preventing your name and email and whatever else, possibly address from being queried by whois).

I think at the very bare minimum they can implement some sort of a secure word / pin / voice password and maybe a call back to a phone number as a secondary measure.

Comment: Re:What's next? (Score 0) 1089

by roman_mir (#49302545) Attached to: Obama: Maybe It's Time For Mandatory Voting In US

I see nothing "socialistic" about a government imposing rules and regulations on businesses.

- do you understand what it means, when the mob (government collective) comes to tell you (private property owner) what you cannot do and how much ransom you have to pay not to be shut down and thrown into a pri... re-education camp?

It means that some collective is preventing you from running your own business or your own life as you see fit and as the market forces allow. That is socialism or fascism, basically a collectivist system.

Free markets have been regulated by government since the dawn of civilization.

- that is the problem.

Comment: Re:But they help also (Score 0) 366

by roman_mir (#49292719) Attached to: Uber Shut Down In Multiple Countries Following Raids

So selfish, not to want the mob to use its overwhelming numbers to attack a minority of people to steal from them because they have something that the mob wants.

I am nowhere near 99.9% or whatever, I oppose all theft out of general principle, that principle being: virtue is non initiation of force.

The socialist mob (jealous thieves) gives the fascist government the power to initiate force against a tiny minority of people who have something that the mob wants. Then the mob is surprised when that tiny minority of people does whatever it can to attempt and fight against this violence and against this theft, which is the most unjust thing that common people except on nearly universal basis and even have the gall to call it 'justice'.

Comment: Re:meanwhile (Score 1, Interesting) 342

by roman_mir (#49287139) Attached to: UK Chancellor Confirms Introduction of 'Google Tax'

First I will give you the economic argument: consumption does not drive the economy, production does. You cannot consume what doesn't exist, which is why you are not flying a space ship yourself to a Jupiter holiday today. Production (creation of stuff) is the economic driver, consumption is the trivial act of economic destruction (even if that destruction is required to keep somebody alive, it is still destruction).

Second I will give you the moral argument (which, as far as I am concerned is the real argument): it is morally indefensible to do what the governments and the mob are doing, stealing from people in the first place and then stealing disproportionately more from some than from others.

All income and wealth related taxes are theft and are immoral acts of violence propagated by the mob with the use of a violent government system. You cannot have a just system as long as the system is immoral and it is immoral to steal from some to provide others with the incentive to gang up against the minority that is being stolen from in order to increase the theft.

"Life sucks, but it's better than the alternative." -- Peter da Silva