Comment: Friends (Score 1) 361
staying away from certain places; like Google Plus, Facebook, and friends
Summary is correct. The only way to stay off of Facebook is to not have any friends.
Comment: Re:Vasectomies aren't reversible? (Score 1, Funny) 160
Comment: Re:Meanwhile (Score 1) 295
Comment: Re:electronic voteing makes it easier to cheat and (Score 2) 211
ballet box stuffing.
I hope they don't do this regularly. If I pay for a box seat at the ballet, I sure don't want to be sitting on somebody's lap!
Comment: Re:Billion (Score 1) 60
They claim to have already designed and built the thing (and have some pictures of a plausible-looking prototype). They just need your hard-earned cash to actually put it into space and build the web portal, [sarcasm]because they forgot about that part in their original budget[/sarcasm]. I feel like the kickstarter page is a publicity stunt instead of a necessary fundraising tool. It's also terribly disingenuous of them to post Hubble images and say "you can take pictures of these" (which most people read as "like these"), implying that their 15cm "main optic" flying at the lowest possible orbit will get anywhere near that amount of pointing stability or resolution.
That said, anything that makes people think about space science, or even make them feel they have a financial stake in it is probably a good thing.
Comment: Re:bad day to be blind. (Score 0) 325
Comment: Re:ToS: can't host any type of server (Score 0) 573
Comment: Re:realization (Score 1) 573
Comment: Re:And we don't need the man in the middle indeed. (Score 1) 555
The only reason franchised dealers were created in the first place was so manufacturers could "shift the responsibility for providing the land, buildings and inventory to dealers". The whole point of the franchise model is so manufacturers can screw their dealers whenever they like.
From the link, this hilarious quote: "Even a small dealership requires an investment of between $12 million and $16 million.
So when a manufacturer comes along with a product that actually makes it cost-effective to properly invest in their customer experience, they get cut out simply because previous companies were too cheap to do it themselves.
Comment: Re:Bad for us = Good for gov't (Score 1) 353
Comment: Re:Terrible move (Score 2) 155
Does Comcast need to rebuild all their infrastructure too? There may not be any landline game in town for some time.
The engineers at Verizon aren't complete idiots, you know. I'm sure they've calculated the cost of adding some cells to handle the demand and found it cheaper than running new copper. And if the business drones are worth the suits on their backs they'll be worried about Comcast poaching customers, so they wouldn't balk at *some* investment to recover from a disaster with some of their reputation intact.
Comment: Re:Power failures? (Score 2) 155
This is not necessarily true anymore. Several times our neighbors' phones went out with the power, but our FIOS phone and cell phones still worked (and continued to work when I plugged our terminal into a bigger UPS). I chalk it up to a bad/insufficient UPS on the copper-to-fiber switches somewhere upstream. We don't get copper back to the switch board anymore.
Also, what Verizon didn't say was how many customers in the town were actually subscribed to copper landlines before the storm. It's possibly most of them had cut the cord already.