I would be more inclined to that position if the current jury had not just returned a verdict form which awarded Apple damages whilst simultaneously finding that there was no patent infringement... (See the live blog from 4.50 EDT)
Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!
Twitter would love to invite you aboard: you are just the sort of person we need. Feel free to share your thoughts, and your contemporaneous fecal status, with millions of people around the world! Just keep it within 140 characters, ok? Otherwise, TL;DR
If the people in the picture are younger than the age at which they can legally consent to having that picture taken, then that picture is illegal.
You don't think your thesis proves too much? This would suggest that every picture of every child legally incapable of "consent" to the taking of that photograph is thereby illegal. I'm sure the Disney Channel is thereby loaded with illegal content...
Unless of course you're a member of the bomb squad. In which case, how/why read e-mails mid task?