Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook


Forgot your password?
For the out-of-band Slashdot experience (mostly headlines), follow us on Twitter, or Facebook. ×

Comment: Re:A good language that'll get slammed... (Score 1) 520 520

The second form is only more readable if the greaterThan10 function is in some library somewhere globally available. Inner functions distract from reading code by breaking up control flow and computation. Now I have to at least skim that inner function as I'm trying to understand the outer function's behavior. It's noise. It doesn't belong there. It's like writing x = x;

Comment: Re:A good language that'll get slammed... (Score 1) 520 520

So, even though software developers consistently say naming things is one of the most difficult parts of their job, and the thesaurus is one of the most useful books for a programmer, you want to introduce more pointless names? Why do you need to name something to understand it? Why can't you just understand the abstraction?

Comment: Re:Not for everybody due to indentation (Score 1) 520 520

More languages are getting these types of syntaxes because people have broken free of the LL(x)/LR parser myopia from academia and are more comfortable with hand-coded parsers which are designed for the person who actually has to get shit done and not just write papers about ways in which other people can get shit done.

Comment: Re:Another language that has a fatal flaw (Score 1) 520 520

How is (a+1)*b any more readable than a+1 * b ? Spaces aren't invisible; they take up SPACE. If you're not using a monospaced font, maybe there's an issue. But otherwise, it seems you're just whining about a feature you're not used to. Or maybe you're one of those programmers who has problems properly spacing their code in the first place. Maybe all your code sucks and languages like this are designed to avoid programmers like you?

Comment: Re:A good language that'll get slammed... (Score 1) 520 520

Forcing code indentation is LESS invasive than forcing semicolons and braces everywhere. You're already going to be typing that tab character in (if you're not, you're a shitty programmer). Why does the language need me to type in more fucking nonsense to understand what is obvious to anyone with a weekend of programming experience?

Comment: Re:Incredible! (Score 2) 204 204

I've tried many cheap versions of electronic chess, and most of them have no support for en passant (a couple don't have support for castling either). Not only that, but playing against other players, most people who play chess for recreation don't seem to know about an passant, anyway. So, let's call it's chess 2.0. Streamlined for the modern audience.

Excessive login or logout messages are a sure sign of senility.