Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment: Re: Read Slashdot (Score 1) 331

by ray-auch (#47977613) Attached to: Ask Slashdot: Finding a Job After Completing Computer Science Ph.D?

"Hide the PhD." How do you then explain the 6 year gap in your resume?

"Misc. contract work"

Interesting, how many contracts, for whom for how long, and can you provide a reference from one of those ?
Why did you quit contracting to go back to perm ?

Hint: Do NOT lie on CV / resume - at some point it _will_ come round and bite you in the arse. If not at interview then later, when it turns out you effectively lied to get the job, and hence can be immediately fired for it (even if they don't, you think that is helpful in your annual salary review ?).

Comment: Re:Regular boards are a lot smarter (Score 1) 93

by ray-auch (#47956245) Attached to: Ask Slashdot: Alternate Software For Use On Smartboards?

Smart boards can be useful for businesses. The people who manage schools want the schools to have the same stuff as the businesses, so they end up investing in smart boards. Unfortunately, they are not all that useful in school.

It's funny, I've never, ever (in 20+yrs in IT including plenty of travel to client-sites) seen a smartboard used in business and only once seen one (possibly broken, never used) in a business at all. On the other hand I have seen loads and loads of them in schools.

In business it's always a flip chart and/or whiteboard, if you're lucky some pens that work, plus a projector - probably vga and lo-res only, but generally you think you are lucky if it actually works, projector screens are optional, frequently just a bit of wall, white if you are lucky. Only schools seem to have the $$$$ smartboards.

Comment: Re:Why purchase service from provider in US then? (Score 1) 126

by ray-auch (#47954581) Attached to: Proposed Law Would Limit US Search Warrants For Data Stored Abroad

If it is a fallacy then it is a very successful and convincing one, because an awful lot of EU business is based on it - business with customers who have to ensure their data storage and hosting complies with EU data protection laws. That the data remained in the EU and subject to EU law was a _big_ selling point. MS doesn't realoly have a lot of choice but to stand behind this "fallacy", because if it falls it threatens their entire EU hosting (cloud) business which is what they built the Irish data centre for.

Comment: Re:i don't have any opinions (Score 2) 380

by ray-auch (#47932389) Attached to: Torvalds: No Opinion On Systemd

B) Monolithic hasn't really been considered a good idea for complex systems since before he was born

And it definitely wasn't considered a good idea for OS kernels when he was first writing Linux. History shows us that in that case, the proponents of "lots of independent bits that send messages between them" turned out to be a lot less successful (and a lot more wrong) than Linus and Linux, which monolithically just got the job done, was delivered in a reasonable time scale and with reasonable performance.

Yes, Linus prefers practical considerations over ideological, but even ideologically it surely wouldn't be a surprise to find him supporting a monolithic approach (and supporting it against prevailing wisdom).

Comment: Re: Finally! (Score 1) 502

by ray-auch (#47588147) Attached to: Judge: US Search Warrants Apply To Overseas Computers

But getting the Irish involved is irrelevant. The prosecutor in this case does not want the actual hard drive with the emails. What would the Irish courts actually *do* in this case?

The EU has data protection laws. If the data is personal data and held in Ireland then Irish DPA applies and the data can only be sent outside of Ireland in accordance with the DPA. The Irish courts would give permission (or not...) for the data to be sent elsewhere outside the protection of the DPA, simple.

Would they send back an email saying "you have our permission to tell your US company to go ahead and retrieve their data from the comfort of their US offices?"

It is not their data to do with as they wish under the DPA, in fact most people would consider it is the customer's data - I certainly consider my emails as my data even if they are on ISP servers.

I don't buy the argument that the data is in Ireland.

Then you have MS on perjury.

MS actually makes a big marketing thing about control of data localization in their cloud, precisely so it can sell it as compliant with the DPA in the EU. A lot of MS cloud business in the EU depends on this, and that is why MS will fight it on principle - they will not care about this one individual's emails at all, but the amount of cloud hosting business they stand to lose if a US prosecutor can simply order them to breach the DPA in the EU is enormous.

Comment: Re: Finally! (Score 2) 502

by ray-auch (#47585505) Attached to: Judge: US Search Warrants Apply To Overseas Computers

The Irish police will say "why are you bothering us? Ask an (Irish) judge like you usually do (via MLAT)". It is the judiciary that need to be involved first. Funnily enough that is also what former Irish attorney general and various senior EU officials have said - the correct approach is to use the MLAT, which is there for exactly this purpose. With a warrant from an Irish court the Irish police will be happy to help, should the Irish operators of the Irish data centre need a hand pushing the button in Ireland.

But the US doesn't want to use MLAT, it wants to end-run around it because they run into annoying problems like having to justify their request properly and whether or not their search is a search or a fishing expedition and stuff like whether the Irish user, in Ireland, has actually done anything illegal in Ireland.

Coincidentally,the UK police don't like MLAT process either and have said so in submissions regarding judicial limits of UK RIPA act. They run into annoying things like the US first amendment stopping them getting details of US users posting stuff on US servers that can be read in the UK and is not legal in the UK. If the DOJ succeeds in bypassing the MLAT process with this trick then some UK police forces will be right behind them ( and probably others elsewhere too). At least one of the amicus briefs points that out.

This will open up a big can of worms if it stands, extradition and MLAT treaties are a necessary process to protect both corporations and individuals from conflicting legal jurisdictions. Microsoft is not (just) saying "we can't, it's in Ireland", they are saying "we are not allowed to under the law of the country where the evidence is". Enabling the international rendition of data at the whim of any country's law enforcement doesn't physically extradite anyone, but it could easily end up making international travel a whole lot more interesting and risky. Be careful about exercising your first amendment rights to hate speech if you ever want a European vacation or business trip. Be aware that some EU jurisdictions are actively trying to outlaw anonymity and pseudonymity online...

Comment: Re:Technical solution to a social problem. (Score 2) 98

Seconded. Except >20yrs and HPUX rather than SunOS.

Police ourselves - yeah sure we did. Act like adults ? er, nope. I figured out several ways to crash machines from console, if someone logged in remote and started using all the resource, I'd crash the machine and move to another. X was completely unsecured in those days but they installed a graphical login. Fake login windows, key loggers, fake error windows (make the guy on the better workstation think it's crashed so he moves off it), check.

Best X trick back then was obviously the ability to put up a window on someone else's screen when the tutor was standing behind them, topless or nude pictures were good (bitmap - time before jpeg existed)... I guess the only thing that's changed now is that the available selection and quality of such images has increased a little. Happy days.

Comment: Re:9 States automatically increased (Score 1) 778

by ray-auch (#47496517) Attached to: States That Raised Minimum Wage See No Slow-Down In Job Growth

Actually, that is the interesting bit.

Of the 9 states that increased automatically, 8 are in the top half of the growth league - conversely 3 out of 4 of the states that voted an increase are in the bottom half.
(link to chart: http://www.cepr.net/images/sto...)

The thing about that correlation is that there is actually a plausible mechanism for causation - predictability. When a business decides to invest in hiring more people, you want to try and work out the costs, the potential for profit and the risk of failure. If you are hiring at or near minimum wage, then the level of minimum wage comes into that business plan. If any increase is automatic then you can simply add it in to costs (based on inflation assumptions which you need elsewhere anyway) - it will go up, but that can be accounted for. If any increase is _not_ automatic, then it becomes an unknown in your costs, a _risk_, dependent on politicians. Even in states that did _not_ raise it but _might_ have, that unknown, political risk, may have adversely affected investment decisions.

Businesses like a predictable environment more than anything.

If my suggested effect is real, then there is also a flip side - it will work like this in an expanding economy, but if the economy is contracting then having an automatic minimum wage increase could conceivably accelerate firing decisions - minimum wage jobs might be lost faster because of the known future costs.

Comment: Re:Local testing works? (Score 2) 778

by ray-auch (#47496335) Attached to: States That Raised Minimum Wage See No Slow-Down In Job Growth

Even when people are supposedly more mobile, moving is a big thing for most people so they do not do it.

Here in the UK we had a 50% tax rate imposed on the very richest a few years ago. There were lots of stories about how this was going to drive away people who were successful abroad but in the end it made very little difference because while these sort of exceeding rich people might threaten to take their family somewhere else, but then when they talk to their wife and she refuses to move more than a 20 minute drive from her family and refuses to move the kids out of school and away from their friends.

as well as moving, people at that level can move their income elsewhere, pension it, or defer it to avoid the tax. Avoidance is not illegal (evasion is).

Key issue with the 50% rate is - did it raise 20% more money than the 40%, for incomes over 100k ? If not, then people _did_ move either themselves or their income, and the country's finances got less benefit.

HMRC reckons the income moved - http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/budget2... - chart on P28 is very interesting, 25% fall in total declared income over 150k, on the introduction of the tax. Other stats: before 50% tax rate 16,000 people with income over £1M, after - 6000. Gradually increased to 10,000 in following years, but that is still 6k people with 1M+ income who went somewhere else (at least 2Bn in tax they would have paid at 40% rate, gone).

The Tao doesn't take sides; it gives birth to both wins and losses. The Guru doesn't take sides; she welcomes both hackers and lusers.

Working...