Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).


Comment: Re:Did they mention the yummy GMOs (Score 2) 90

by quantaman (#49498163) Attached to: Columbia University Doctors Ask For Dr. Mehmet Oz's Dismissal

Quackery they could tolerate. But how dare he question the nutritious yummy GMOs whose manufacturers are pumping millions of dollars into endowments for those other Columbia University medical faculty. While he's enriching himself, those poor souls may lose out on lucrative $$$. Can't have that.
(That's not to say dr. Oz is not a quack - he certainly is a snake oil salesman, but these guys have an agenda that's as clear as day)

Rather Dr. Oz has an agenda in spinning his response so it looks like his accusers have an agenda.

Police: Joe robbed a grocery store last week and shot five people this week!

Joe: It's not fair to say I robbed the grocery store. The owner was greedy and ripping people off!

Comment: Re:I guess he crossed the wrong people (Score 3, Insightful) 90

by quantaman (#49498151) Attached to: Columbia University Doctors Ask For Dr. Mehmet Oz's Dismissal

As long as he was peddling magical dietary supplements and weight loss pills he was a lovable scamp and was allowed to carry on with his mischief. But as soon as he dared cross Monsanto, he is a quack that must be squashed.

Here's the relevant portions of the letter in question:
As described here and here, as well as in other publications, Dr. Oz has repeatedly shown disdain for science and for evidence-based medicine, as well as baseless and relentless opposition to the genetic engineering of food crops. Worst of all, he has manifested an egregious lack of integrity by promoting quack treatments and cures in the interest of personal financial gain.

Thus, Dr. Oz is guilty of either outrageous conflicts of interest or flawed judgements about what constitutes appropriate medical treatments, or both. Whatever the nature of his pathology, members of the public are being misled and endangered, which makes Dr. Oz's presence on the faculty of a prestigious medical institution unacceptable.

I see one reference to GMO opposition and two or three references to quack science and conflicts of interest. Dr. Oz's rebuttal on the other hand only specifically mentions the GMO's.

It's a clever PR ploy on Dr. Oz's part, focus on the milder part of the accusation and suggest a conspiracy. Meanwhile ignore the more serious accusations that are much harder to defend.

Comment: Re:Ray, you're above embargos (Score 1) 15

by quantaman (#49497803) Attached to: Recon Instruments' Sports-Oriented Smart Glasses Now Shipping

Nothing like releasing your review the day after units start shipping, ie when it's too late to find out the unit's faults.

Goddammit I hate embargos...the only reason they exist is to hide flaws and problems from people who could get a refund. Ray, stop being the industry's bitch. You have a ton of readers, tell gadget makers to pound sand if they tell you that you can't release a review before it ships.

More likely it's a PR thing, you want the biggest media splash when the device is available for purchase, not before when you only have a handful of people willing to preorder.

Comment: Re:Stopping Bing from indexing YouTube? (Score 2) 183

by quantaman (#49490911) Attached to: Microsoft's Role As Accuser In the Antitrust Suit Against Google

Seems they have an issue with truth here, Google does not stop them indexing Youtube, see the Robots.txt below.

The Robots.txt is just a suggestion, if the blocking was in there MS could just ignore it. I suspect the issue is that Google is detecting and blocking Microsoft's web crawlers, either deliberately or as collateral damage from trying to stop hostile bots.

Duckduckgo uses youtube

Duckduckgo is a meta search engine, they don't actually build their own index but create an index based on results from other search engines. Besides, I'm guessing the issue isn't that engines can't index Youtube at all, but they can't build a good index because they keep getting blocked.

Comment: Re:Not fully junk (Score 3, Interesting) 294

It is junk science, some creatures can indeed be frozen and revived because of unique properties of their physiology. Humans cannot.

In fact, by decapitating this girl and digging her brain out of her skull, they've guaranteed she is forever dead.

So we're very unlikely to be able thaw her brain and have it work again.

But that's not the only option. Even in a brain frozen and turned into mush there will still be a lot of information preserved, how do you know that preserved information is insufficient to recreate a human consciousness?

Remember we're potentially talking about hundreds of years in the future, it's entirely plausible to assume we're talking a full theory of consciousness with nanites and a brains uploaded into computers. Are you really so certain consciousness couldn't be extracted from those brains?

Comment: Re:Hasn't this been proven to be junk science? (Score 1) 294

I can remember reading several articles which stated that cryonics doesn't work because the freezing process is not perfect - it does not stop decomposition, which older frozen specimens were starting to show. Why do people still spend money on this?

Disregard cost and even at the worst their outcomes won't be any worse than the control group.

Comment: Re:Valve needs to use their clout (Score 1) 309

by quantaman (#49480929) Attached to: NVIDIA's New GPUs Are Very Open-Source Unfriendly

They *should*, if their goal of legitimizing Open Source video drivers is true.

Legitimizing Linux gaming is not really dependent on having open source the drivers. It is dependent on having good drivers. Valve does not have a stated goal of supporting open source. Their goal is to sell games.

Decent open source drivers might even contradict their goal of legitimizing Linux gaming.

Anyone using Steam is obviously open to running proprietary code on their computer, the only question is how much proprietary code.

If there's decent open source drivers then a subset of the Linux user base is going to use those and they've got to be supported. That's more work for Valve and game publishers since there's another driver to test against. Costs go up, bugs go up, and fewer people develop games for Linux.

The best thing for Linux gaming on Steam is everyone using the same high quality driver, I wouldn't expect Valve to fight for something else.

Comment: Re:Contracts (Score 4, Interesting) 131

by quantaman (#49475897) Attached to: How Mission Creep Killed a Gaming Studio

So the real story is that bad contracts killed a gaming studio?

What idiots signed a contract allowing Microsoft to unilaterally change requirements mid-project with no increase in budget?

Three theories:

1) The execs were idiots for signing the contract.

2) If the execs didn't sign the contract Microsoft would just go to another studio and they'd just have died a slower death.

3) The contract didn't really matter, Microsoft always had the option to walk away and if that happened the studio would die.

I'm guessing some combination of 2 and 3.

Comment: Re:Affirmative Action is not the same as sexism (Score 1) 493

Did you read you link?

It doesn't say what you think it says. Not surprising. It's deliberately unclear, like most social science.

Men in traditional woman jobs were rated second highest of categories. The highest rated category was (wait for it) women in traditional woman jobs.

Basically it says the opposite of what you claim it says.

Sorry, I thought the link was talking about the professional effect rather than perception.

This paper suggest an actual professional advantage for male nurses though the abstract doesn't mention in comparison to what. There's various other sites talking about the effect but that's the only peer reviewed study I saw.

Comment: Re:Affirmative Action is not the same as sexism (Score 1) 493

So we'll see the opposite in nursing schools?

No? You must be full of shit.

Actually yes

And there should be (assuming male dominated professions have similar corrections).

The job of a faculty member is to do research and teach, having a novel perspective is a huge benefit for both.

An easy way to get a novel perspective is different life experiences, this means different races, cultures, and gender.

So if you have two otherwise equal candidates of different genders then your organization will be best served by selecting the under-represented gender.

Comment: Re:the superbowl of stupidity (Score 2) 289

Smartwatches were the #1 most returned tech item of 2014. Some models were as much as 60% returned! They're absolutely despised by anyone who has used one. I'm one of newegg's product testers and I tested the 2nd generation of Samsung smartwatches. I and everyone gave it a horrible review then I sold it. But this time around, it's Apple fans buying the product. So who will win in this epic battle of Apple false superiority and arrogant smugness versus the strong urge to return their useless, annoying product.

Possibly though I'll hand it to Apple that they've had a fairly decent track record in figuring out products that people will actually use.

Outside of a fancy running watch I'm not sure what a smart watch is good for, then again I wasn't sure what a tablet was good for either.

Comment: Re:Another slashvertisement (Score 5, Insightful) 148

by quantaman (#49462809) Attached to: Nearly Half of <em>Game of Thrones</em> Season 5 Leaks Online

Oh, Hugh Pickens. 'Nuf said. As if being the #1 pirated show doesn't bring it enough publicity, they have to advertise it here.

I pride myself in the fact that I have never watched even a single episode of the show. Judging by the hype and how popular it is with the general populace, it seems my decision is the correct one.

Silly me, I tend to base my viewing decisions on whether a particular show is good or not, whether the "right" people share my particular taste is irrelevant.

By taking pride in not seeing a single episode you're not celebrating refined taste, you're celebrating ignorance.

Comment: Re:Hooray! (Score 1) 676

by quantaman (#49462019) Attached to: Hillary Clinton Declares 2016 Democratic Presidential Bid

Gotcha. It wasnt Hilly noooo, she was just...gasp!...the victim of over-aggressive supporters. I bet you will say the same thing about her "3 in the morning phone call" ad too know the one that undermined Barry in the eyes of 50% of the population and made his job a shit ton harder.

Did that argument sound convincing while you were writing it because it sure as hell isn't convincing reading it.

There is a massive difference between an ad created by the candidate's team, starring the candidate, and explicitly approved by the candidate, and a rumour started by self-declared supporters of the candidate.

And then you move the goal posts.


Comment: Re:Hooray! (Score 1) 676

by quantaman (#49459843) Attached to: Hillary Clinton Declares 2016 Democratic Presidential Bid

"If people consistently think your criticism has racial overtones "

It's certainly not consistently, but has happened. Mostly I've chuckled at how ridiculous it is, or replied: In the words of Bugs Bunny, "What a maroon."

Laughing at misplaced righteous outrage usually works a lot better than replying in kind.

That's plausible, I don't know what criticism you've actually received or what you said to trigger it.

My only point is that there's a lot of racist criticism of Obama and there will be sexist criticism of Hillary. Even if you're not doing it consciously you can be caught if you're unaware of the origin of the criticisms you make.

Have you ever noticed that the people who are always trying to tell you `there's a time for work and a time for play' never find the time for play?