Comment: FM service is a Bliss (Score 1) 108
+ - Cell Phones Powered by Conversations->
Link to Original Source
+ - New thundarcats series by Cartoon Network->
Link to Original Source
Comment: In your own words! (Score 2, Informative) 766
Comment: BSD? (Score 1) 229
Comment: No wonder you like Vista. You're a Linux user. (Score 1) 374
Comment: Excessive usage = Health Problems (Score 1) 420
A History of 3D Cards From Voodoo To GeForce 320
from the long-and-winding-road dept.
Google Earth As a Game Engine For Ship Simulation 84
from the all-i-ask-is-a-tall-e-ship dept.
Five Nvidia CUDA-Enabled Apps Tested 134
from the need-for-speed dept.
Comment: Re:Revert interface to 0.8.6, or use OSX GUIfor wi (Score 1) 488
Comment: Re:Surprise? (Score 1) 724
Comment: Where did they found this ter'angreal? (Score 1) 217
Comment: It was just too slow for me. (Score 0, Informative) 396
I tried it back in 2004, and the thing that struck me most about it (besides the fact that it was free) was the speed. It took FOREVER to open and save. I was in a phase when I was trying to move over to as much open source software as possible to save money, but OpenOffice just ended up frustrating me. Also, I recall fighting against the program to do simple things in spreadsheets.
I use and love Gnumeric now for spreadsheets, but I resolved that I'd rather pay for MSOffice. It isn't perfect, but I was willing to pay.
I was always so confused about it too, because my initial exposure to open source taught me to expect this kind of software to, as a rule, always be leaner, smaller, cleaner and faster than "bloated" MS products, but I walked away from OO feeling IT was more bloated.