Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:how many scientists are enough? (Score 1) 551

I think the main problem is not just that top talent is no longer going into science and engineering, but that poorer talent is entering. Every university you can think of now has a program where you can graduate with a bachelors in science. It used to be that top schools were the only ones producing anyone who can reasonably call themselves scientists, but now everyone is doing it. It's even worse for engineering. Here in Canada we have very strict regulations on the certification of our engineers to make sure that they all have the same basic knowledge, but I know people who went into engineering programs that had required entrance averages a full 20% lower than mine! I wouldn't trust them to engineer a toaster, but they're in fields with a lot more responsibility, like aerospace for example. And that's /with/ our strict regulations, I know places in the U.S. have lower standards and the people who graduate from those programs will one day call themselves engineers.

Comment Re:Well if that's true... (Score 4, Interesting) 1255

Guys rarely go into female only fields like nursing or pre-school teaching for the same reasons girls don't do tech

Except that 10% of nurses are now male, rising every year. On top of that 20% of current nursing students are male, again, rising every year.

Is it really so hard to believe that more men find electrical engineering interesting and more women find psychology interesting? Do we really have to be the same to be equal? I hope not, that would be pretty boring.

Slashdot Top Deals

Another megabytes the dust.

Working...