Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system


Forgot your password?

Comment: Re:Can't wait to hear what happened (Score 1) 133

by pepsikid (#47772489) Attached to: Time Warner Cable Experiences Nationwide Internet Outage
My symptoms WERE DNS. My home servers were still getting (reduced) web and mail connections, and I could reach web pages by IP address. I swiched my DNS servers around multiple times and found everyone's DNS servers just timed out. That's highly selective. I think what got screwed up was an attempt to transparently filter or redirect DNS traffic.

Comment: I was affected (Score 1) 133

by pepsikid (#47772439) Attached to: Time Warner Cable Experiences Nationwide Internet Outage

I can't believe how much chat there is about this outage, and so little talk about what diagnostics showed the problem was. It was a DNS issue, NOT a general routing issue.

It hit us here in Austin TX. It looked like a DNS outage... but I was using Google DNS. Routing was NOT down... I could still access a selection of web servers by direct IP address, and ping and traceroute. Rebooted my modem and router repeatedly. Modem acquired a link quickly, and status page showed it had a valid configuration. Modem's signal strength dropped from the usual minus-8-ish to minus-6-ish dBmV. Router acquired IP and WAN domain name effortlessly.

I tried OpenDNS, Earthlink, Dell, and some other public DNS servers I have in a list, but they didn't work either. All timed out. I didn't know what TWC's DNS servers were, so I zeroed them out in my router config, then rebooted. Well, DHCP picked up TWC's DNS servers like nothing was wrong. STILL had no working DNS resolution! And I could still access websites by direct IP address. I was also still receiving mail and web traffic to my own servers, though well below usual levels. The email server was rejecting all mail though, since it couldn't verify the sender's domain names.

Exhausted, I gave up and went to bed. Everything was simply working again when I got up.

The evidence suggests that TWC decided to *filter* DNS traffic, possibly even to aggregate and reroute all of it, and they screwed the pooch. I can't think of any legitimate reason they'd need to do this. I think I'm going to go back to running my own DNS server. Not much I can do about state-redirected DNS traffic other than tunnel it through a VPN perhaps.

Comment: NSA Definitions and weasel words (Score 1) 245

by pepsikid (#47205471) Attached to: NSA's Novel Claim: Our Systems Are Too Complex To Obey the Law

"an immediate, specific, and harmful impact on the national security of the United States."

Yes, and see, they measured it out to be on the order of .0000000000000001% of a mission obstacle lasting all of 6 seconds. But by strict definition, it qualifies to trigger the "let us do anything we want without conditions" mechanism they love so much.

"This of course implies that they have no backup system — or at least that the backup are not held for long."

Unfortunately, it proves nothing. The recording systems capture EVERY byte coming along the cables and can be used to REPLAY exactly what data went between two points at any time. This means they can go back and re-examine traffic to find hidden transmissions they overlooked before. They don't throw anything out (specifically stating that they keep anything encrypted forever) and longevity is reported as anywhere from 4 days to several years of 100% of the Internet's activity. Reports vary due to being what the system was capable of at the time, probably. The UT center probably won't be full until your kids are out of diapers and graduating high school.

Comment: Re:ya (Score 2) 282

Really? REALLY?

So, Netflix pays to have a direct line installed to Comcast, thus circumventing Comcast's backbone provider, and saving Comcast the expense of paying for all that video bandwidth. The bill is picked up by Netflix. For some refuckulous reason, Comcast wants to CHARGE Netflix for this direct-peering arrangement, and when Netflix goes "dude... whut?" Comcast starts bawling about being "forced" to provide Netflix with "free bandwidth"? Hahahhhhahahahahaa.....

See, when I walk down the street to drop a note off at my neighbor's house, I am NOT "cheating" USPS and "forcing" them to provide me with a "free" delivery. I've gone and done the damn thing myself, at my own expense, if any.

What's happened here is that Netflix found that Comcast's backbone providers could not be trusted to move data reliably and equitably. Then they went and determined that it would also be damned cheaper to just run their own line to Comcast's network as well. This contributes to a multi-pathed Internet which circumvents the grievously centralized Internet that we have now, studded with gate-keepers who do nothing but impose obstacles and demand money to overcome them. The Powers That Be cannot have this. Although the peering benefits Comcast in this case, it sets a precedent which could cost them profit in the future. By failing to rise up and sabotage this aspect of network neutrality, Comcast would receive the scowls of their monopolist peers.

Comment: Re:Was FORTRAN really that hard? (Score 1) 224

by pepsikid (#46875743) Attached to: 50 Years of BASIC, the Language That Made Computers Personal
First of all, you don't "hit RUN". You type "run" and hit "enter". If your keyboard had a big, red "RUN" key, it probably just locked up the computer. :D

Now, some versions of BASIC would evaluate each line of code you'd just input for obvious errors as soon as you hit enter to save it. It would work whether you had preceded the code with a line number or not. It would try to tell you what kind of error it thought it saw. If you had multiple syntax errors, it might frustrate the fark out of you by responding with the same error even though you'd retyped or edited the line to fix one of them. Some of them would just flash $ERR?$ or something useless at you instead.

Comment: Re:Happy Birthday (Score 1) 224

by pepsikid (#46875625) Attached to: 50 Years of BASIC, the Language That Made Computers Personal
Purists will LOVE this:

0 cls:forx=1964to2014:?"Happy Birthday, Basic":nextx

LBASIC was very easygoing about spacing and is probably the reasonicanstilleasilyreadsentenceswithoutspaces.

The feature only failed me under one circumstance as in; 100 letcall="5982341000":ifphone<>callprint"They Don't Match!" because since "phone" would never match "cal", it would always cause "They Don't Match!" to unexpectedly come out on the line printer, scaring the shit out of ya in the process.

Comment: Costco's target market DOES buy extra goods (Score -1, Flamebait) 440

by pepsikid (#46617001) Attached to: Million Jars of Peanut Butter Dumped In New Mexico Landfill donate to food banks. If word spreads that NM food banks have all the peanut butter they'll need for this year, then Costco loses a tiny percentage of their expected sales of that item. I expect that the math works out to at or above $60k worth of peanut butter sales per year which are tracked to food bank donations. Thus, fcuk the needy, fcuk the peanut butter.

I say; boycott Costco peanut butter. Take multiple jars of it to the checkout counter, but then set them aside and say you aren't buying them.

Comment: w00tw00t? (Score 1, Interesting) 58

by pepsikid (#46383921) Attached to: Inside the Billion-Dollar Hacker Club
Are these the dicks who are constantly filling my weblog with:

140224 042320 - /var/www/html/ 401 401
140226 084433 - /var/www/html/ 401 401
140226 210354 - /var/www/html/ 401 401
140301 232858 - /var/www/html/ 401 401
140217 122758 - /var/www/html/ 401 401
140217 124326 - /var/www/html/ 401 401
140218 081257 - /var/www/html/ 401 401

Comment: Re:I've just been dealing with this (Score 1) 388

by pepsikid (#45928749) Attached to: Ask Slashdot: What To Do With Misdirected Email?
The funnest case I've had is where I actually get emails addressed to in my inbox. This is when some company uses gmail as their provider internally, but using their own domain name. The system is remapping the email name wrong because some dufus at stupidcompany typoed their real email pepsikidd setting up the new employee/

Comment: Yahoo! Custom! Spyware! Embed! Service! (Score 4, Insightful) 137

by pepsikid (#45629405) Attached to: Insight On FBI Hacking Ops
Unless this Iranian troll was naive enough to open one of those "e-cards" that required a little "browser helper", this strongly suggests that Yahoo complied with the government's request to push spyware onto a specific member's computer. They could do this through the ad mechanism, or perhaps the all-new Yahoo! Email! has an embedded Patriot! Patch! facility built-in?

Comment: Black holes older than the current universe (Score 2) 164

by pepsikid (#44825091) Attached to: Black Holes Grow By Eating Quantum Foam
It doesn't sound like too crazy of an idea to me, that these apparently precocious supermassive black holes were just left over from an earlier universe. Suppose our Big Bang erupted into a preexisting space, and these awaiting black holes significantly accelerated the galaxy-making schedule this time around. Yes, this time around.

Instead of hyperinflation expanding faster than light in the first microseconds, perhaps our Bang opened into a pre-existing "cavity" of a few light-minutes across. Perhaps we burst out of a dimple in the wall of a larger space; an ancient, nearly-collapsed universe, breathing new life into it and restarting inflation. Expansion was at purely Einsteinian speeds (is there such a term?), but an illusion was created of superluminal motion.

I've also got a theory that the acceleration of inflation is less due to mysterious 'dark energy' than to our halo of "new" matter approaching a halo of really, really old cold matter and inactive black holes that exists beyond the Hubble radius. The Great Attractor may just be a lump that is a bit closer than the rest.

Or acceleration may be due to our 3-dimensional universe passing over and through higher-dimensional topologies that are invisible to us but for their gravity. We've begun to roll downhill, for reasons of absolutely no significance, and we'll just continue to do so until things level out. The higher-dimension topologies being invisible to us, we just have to take them as we get 'em, like unexpected waves.

Comment: Re:ATT is forcing users onto Uverse (Score 1) 347

by pepsikid (#43891011) Attached to: Ask Slashdot: What Is the Future of Old Copper Pair Technology?
Bad news; chances are, they moved your wire pair to the same box your uverse neighbors run through anyway. Your connection is crummy because they make it so. See if you can verify the configuration of your modem at If you're getting 50% or less of what your tier is supposed to provide, they will have to fix it. And they can throttle it transparently by "misconfiguring" upstream equipment. Happened to us once a year. Level II has to "fix" that since the lines will "check out ok".

Comment: Re:ATT is forcing users onto Uverse (Score 1) 347

by pepsikid (#43890993) Attached to: Ask Slashdot: What Is the Future of Old Copper Pair Technology?
This is true. We were told we couldn't get higher speeds than "Pro 3Mbps" because we had "legacy DSL". Our speeds sucked even though we were only 4000' from the nearest central office. One tech we had out here told us that really, we were wired into the DSLAM 1500' away just like the uverse in the area. So, we were getting a miserable 2.5Mbps while only 1500' away from where our wires joined the fiber just because we wouldn't "upgrade" to a different brand of service.

"Why waste negative entropy on comments, when you could use the same entropy to create bugs instead?" -- Steve Elias