No, your example it is as follows:
Step 1: Block the transaction
Step 2: Ask if it was you?
Step 3Y: If the same transaction is re-ran, approve.
Step 3N: Block the card
There's no ambiguity to whether the transaction will go through or not. If you say Yes, it will not charge you unless you redo the transaction.
I used my UA card for over $25,000 purchases this year (for the status credit) in the United States, Austria, Germany, and Armenia, and have not had the issues you had. When I do have an issue, such as ordering the new Nexus 5X on Google's site but inputting the wrong zip code, the above mentioned text message response and then properly inputting my ZIP code fixed it.
Additionally I have two Chase Freedom cards, one of which authorized a $750.00 PayPal transaction that was fraudulent, but then emailed me about it afterwards. I confirmed it was fraudulent and it was gone in a couple days.
Your use case of multiple purchases at the same merchant might be indicative of fraud similar to me using the wrong ZIP code, but if you have it set up correct for the SMS response it really isn't an issue; it just seems like user error.
My experience has been actually very good with Chase cards...
They decline the transaction then text you asking to reply "1" for Yes or "2" for No if it was you. Then you just reply "1" and repeat the transaction and it goes through.
Simultaneously they send an email with a green "yes" and a red "no" button that functions similarly.
Millennia after the impending nuclear war, archaeologists (under a different name in some new language, presumably "fjjakkjalers") will unearth evidence of a giant ring 27km in circumference on what is now the Franco-Swiss border.
Finding various "artifacts" (perhaps called "harahalnangs" in the future language), the fjjakkjalers will construct a 'theory' of polytheism, since the different sizes of identical tools found repeatedly throughout the site were obviously connected to many gods of different sizes.
Upon further inspection, they might see that this giant ring had fragments of a tube throughout its circumference, perhaps alluding to the passage of some material through this tube in the shape of small balls ("balls" in the future language), which would have been identified as a form of torture yet to be fully explained by the torturers of the future ("internet commentators", in the future language).
Why should there be a banner? If you go to Twitter to get your breaking news, you're a maroon.
Maybe it's just a case of ageism. After thinking he meant stupid people from context clues, I literally had to google "maroon urban dictionary" to verify it (old people call "stupid people" maroons since they learned that on Bugs Bunny cartoons?). After older people ask me how I found "_____" and I tell them Twitter, it's markedly harder to teach older people how to use Twitter in a useful manner for themselves. We usually revert to me just continuing to feed them information I find myself.
Twitter is useful for on the ground, at the moment, eye-witness accounts of shit happening.
I wholeheartedly agree. I also travel a lot to countries the MSM does not care to talk about, or where events there have gone past the "two-week MSM reporting period" (since that's how long money-making attention lasts), and so Twitter is mainly the only place I go to get "real" news that is unfettered and unabridged.
In a way, Notepad++ was written by one person, right?*
*With a handful of contributors since 2014?
Exactly, great point. Why would someone who is intelligent click on such an ad? I don't make $200k+, but I always assumed that clicking that link is a path to a Nigerian Prince promising that salary.
Why does Carnegie Mellon imply that women should be shown stupider ads than the present algorithm identifies?
Nuclear plants of the design mentioned in the article must legally have offsite power to continue operation. As soon as offsite power is lost, the plant is required to shutdown. An emergency shutdown is more paperwork than a planned shutdown such as this.
The reason for this is that in an accident scenario, you would like to rely on offsite power to run your emergency coolant pumps for this particular design.
Newer reactor designs don't have this issue, but this is a pretty economic decision considering an emergency shutdown if/when the offsite power does eventually trip. The grid seems pretty unreliable based on past experience, as the article even notes.
While you're right, I am guilty of attacking the submitter, he has a history of posting "facts" with no further comment or context.
Is this story relevant? Maybe. Is this story abnormal? No. What is the first thing that will happen when an uninformed person reads this story? They'll probably post something like the AC with the headline "Devil's advocate" a few posts below after having formed an unjustified negative opinion.
There's a difference between posting pure "facts" and "just posting something with minimal information" with the intent to foster a negative viewpoint that supports his personally chosen cause. Borderline malicious.
However, in this case, the customers don't lose power because the generation isn't there. Customers would lose power because the grid fails. Entergy has power from other sources or purchasing agreements to make up for this temporarily.
Similarly, it is unsafe (and illegal, technically) to run your nuclear powerplant with no access to the grid. If you have a coal plant that gets disconnected from the grid, you'd shut it down too with no way to generate revenue from burning additional fuel.
Devil's advocate to your misguided devil's advocate...The problem is the electrical grid not the source.
everything in the above post
Holy Hyperbole, Batman!
It's reassuring that the decision-makers in that process consider alternative ideas; basing the goal on 'human-like' sight would leave a lot of room for error (given limitations of even human perception and classification capabilities!)
Retirement means that when someone says "Have a nice day", you actually have a shot at it.