Maybe you should call your representatives and ask them to make a law against forcing someone to have an abortion when they don't want one. I'm just saying that, cause you are acting like such a law is necessary. Personally, I thought that was already illegal.

PS: You also need to stop living under a rock, pro-abortion people don't exist. There's a world of difference between being in favor of legalization of something, than of being in favor of the thing itself. I assume you're a pro-picking-your-nose person because you don't think picking your nose should be illegal?

I doubt there's any law against asking someone for money in exchange for a license to use copyrighted material. Nor is there any law against using copyrighted material without paying under the fair use exemption. You could pay money to use material even if you think it is covered under fair use, if you feel like it, but you don't need to.

There's no law that says people holding copyrights have to give you the capability to copy-paste the material. I know, cause one time I tried to sue someone because I couldn't copy-paste their print book. If you don't like it, type a copy, or copy-paste it after disabling Javascript, or blocking the ***holes at icopyright.net via adblocker or hosts file.

I WISH people could be arrested for filing a false report. Remember, the whole problem is that there are no penalties for filing false reports, but there is a penalty for not taking the site down immediately.

I won't be paying for cable TV, nor will any of my brothers. If the cable companies don't adapt and fast, they will die out with our parent generation. It's not so much that they're using the wrong technology, but rather that a similar but cheaper option is available. Internet can just as easily do phone, radio, and TV as well generic data. Adapt or die, content providers.

Well one of its isotopes seems to have a longer half-life than my ping time, I guess that makes it stable! They can even make more than one atom per month!

Actually, the very first job of immune cells is to recognize self. After they can recognize self, then they go on to attack non-self. If the immune system were to attack self, you get various autoimmune diseases ranging from diabetes to arthritis. So what I wonder about these, given that they grow in a lab and never recognize you, is whether they will tag our own cells?

And, as a good prof you should consider if your attitude is causing some people to skip your lectures, and then fail. Especially if what you teach is different than the text.

I take notes in CS class as well. Only I take very few notes in that sort of class. I like to have a word-for-word of certain algorithms or formulas that may be talked about.

I think the term we're looking for here, is "indian class action lawsuit".

My guess, if the internet wins the Nobel Peace Prize, the money will go toward internet infrastructure in poor countries with a violence problem.

For chemists, solutions are things that are all mixed up!