Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Re:I sense a great disturbance in the web... (Score 1) 176

And quite often the antibiotics used in farm animals aren't considered safe for humans.
See also: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/05/130513095030.htm
I also wonder about how the concentrations of arsenic vary throughout the chicken - e.g. if you make pate from the chicken livers do you get a higher or lower dose? I suspect significantly higher.
Some people may also be allergic to the antibiotics or other stuff used and not actually allergic to the meat/vegetable itself.

Comment: Re:Genius! (Score 2) 194

"Do you know any off-hand or can you find one or two?"

I don't have case citations at hand but you can look them up. In particular, find copyright cases surrounding player piano rolls, in which the courts ruled that it made absolutely no difference whether copyrighted works were used to control a machine.

John Philip Sousa was famously involved in some of those suits.

+ - Prenda lawyer kicked off 9th Circuit case

Submitted by rudy_wayne
rudy_wayne writes "On Friday, Paul Hansmeier, a Minnesota attorney who has been pointed to as one of the masterminds of the Prenda copyright-trolling scheme, filed an emergency motion to stay the $81,000 sanctions order while he and his colleagues could mount an appeal. Today the appeals court flatly denied his motion.. Two appellate judges signed this order, and it gives Hansmeier the option to make a plea for delay with the district court judge. That would be US District Judge Otis Wright, the judge who sanctioned Hansmeier in the first place.

Hansmeier is also getting kicked off a case he was working on that was totally unrelated to Prenda's scheme of making copyright accusations over alleged pornography downloads. On Friday, the 9th Circuit Commissioner ordered Hansmeier, in no uncertain terms, to withdraw a the case involving Groupon since he has been referred to the Minnesota State Bar for investigation. The commissioner has delayed Hansmeier's admission to the 9th Circuit because of Wright's order, which refers to Wright's finding of "moral turpitude.""

Comment: Re:Try to do something right (Score 1) 100

"Sometimes the evidence itself is more important than the source. In the particular case, it sounds like the evidence was strong enough that it wouldn't matter which source it came from."

Fortunately there have been a few judges lately who have an actual head on their shoulders, and who have ruled that simply telling somebody their fly is open is not the same as rape.

But these B.S. laws, like CFAA and DMCA, need to disappear. They were ill-conceived and we KNOW that they cause problems. Not little problems, big ones.

I would keep the safe-harbor provisions of DMCA, and scrap all the rest of it. Same with CFAA.

Comment: Re:Genius! (Score 4, Informative) 194

"I'm just saying that a favorable ruling here would insta kill windows, especially on the business side of things where things are inter-dependent and integrated to a degree that sometimes involves licensing."

F*cking clueless judges. There is precedent going back well over 100 years that software is irrelevant to the nature of the machine. Examples: different cards in a Jacquard loom do not make it a "different" loom. Different player piano rolls do not make it a "different" piano. Etc. There are actual court decisions to this effect.

Not to mention that it is also common sense.

"If you ever want to get anywhere in politics, my boy, you're going to have to get a toehold in the public eye."

Working...