Comment: Re:It's not a patent (Score 1) 135
But even if you don't have genetic patents they still have an incentive... Patent for drug X that affect gene Y in this manner.. Or Patent for cheaply and accurately detecting gene Z.
Genetic patents are not really good because they patent the actual gene so nobody else can make similar and better drugs or tests for that specific thing... There in lies the evil...
If we take genetically modified crops... They are patented and they are suing people that reuse seeds from their last harvest...... Now lets say Company A gets a patent where they insert some new genetic sequence into a person... If that person then gets a kid then he will be infringing too?? Or how about if a virus would absorb a genetic-sequence and then spread over a population... Will the infected be patent-infringers too??
Patents on genes should not exist. It's a really dangerous thing that actually hinders development of new treatments and blocks actual research.
Do a google and read up a bit on the issues with genetic-patents... To get you started...
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/apr/24/gene-patents-scientific-research-innovation