Are programmers more likely to be terrorists?
No, because they're not engineers.
*ducks and runs*
Are programmers more likely to be terrorists?
No, because they're not engineers.
*ducks and runs*
Only at incompetent companies.
If the CIO is making a decision on the OS to use, then get the hell out of that place now.
Well, companies have to make money, and that means doing their job and doing it better than the other guy. It's not that some top level management says, "We will use Windows 10!" but that in order to fulfill the business requirements and get a decent ROI, they will have to run certain software. That software will have to perform certain functions and will have dependencies, especially if coming from a vendor since most software is not written in house. Out of that, they're going to have to go with the most common denominator of an OS (sometime least common denominator) which will most likely eventually be Win10 because any other choice would cost more money that it would save.
But don't worry, I suspect that enterprise will be able to get out of a lot of the things we don't like about Win10 such as the spyware. There are simply too many legalities that MS would be susceptible to if there wasn't from things like SEC rules and HIPAA laws. Of course, the solution for such will be as it is with even many simple things that should be a check box for home users, "Go set up a group policy in your Active Domain".
I'd like a car analogy.
It's as if a motorcycle mechanic had figured out how to replace the burnt out engine of a unimog with a new crated engine in record time by using engine hoist techniques usually reserved for motorcycles and not cars.
How do they know the earth was first fully formed and only then collided with something large causing the moon to form? I can imagine it was a bit of a jumble at the time but this claim seems a bit arbitrary. Why the need for a collision with something large? Was it something larger than the moon?
It comes basically from the various theories on the formation of the moon. It could have been created in place, spun off of the earth, captured while it passed by, the result of a collision with another object, etc. So there were lots of different theories, and then there was the actual evidence dealing with the chemical make up of the moon, the orbital mechanics, the conservation of angular momentum, etc. Some theories were better than others and explaining the various facts. Some were much worse than the others at explaining the observed facts. In the late 90's, computer simulation of an object hitting the photo-earth and then forming into the current earth and moon because possible and showed that it was possible. That theory then jumped to the head of the line as it at least came in with a C grade (this was in the college physics presentation I attended in the early 90's on the topic) in the various criteria where other theories all still had D and F grades in some of them. It showed that the collision could have resulted in the proto-earth capturing the other objects iron core to explain our large core and the moon's lack of similar amount, the general chemical composition of both, etc etc. So far it seems the theory continues to get stronger. From last I heard, current theory is that two "moons" formed in orbit, and a smaller one eventually collided with the larger and formed the far mountainous side in a fairly non-energetic collision. that was to explain some of the differences between the near and far sides of the moon as well as asymmetric features of the moon. I haven't read this article, but it sounds like this might be an alternate theory to explain similar things. Eventually the theories will continue to get refined till we have a fairly good idea of how it all happened.
... but Christensen was awful; wooden most of the time, delivering his lines like a Speak-and-Spell, and then finding the magic way to be wooden AND over-emotive in other scenes. It's little wonder he's done so little work since the Prequels. He's just unbearable.
Yes, but he does an excellent job of sounding just like an awkward teenager that just found out he has knocked up his girlfriend.
In the case of a taxi however, even if they're using a taxi app, there is no guarantee that they're coming to pick you up, because someone else could flag them on the way, they may get a more attractive offer of someone needing a ride to the airport That is nonsense. Legally questionable, and what taxi business would allow that?
Seattle's Orange Cab from my experience.
That would indeed be one way to terminate the organization. ISIS funds itself largely via its oil and gas business. Make these operations impossible for them.
While they do make a lot of money from oil and gas, before they held land, they still made plenty of money through protection. Much the money coming from Saudi Arabia and other countries is not coming from idealogical supporters but from protection rackets extorting money under threat of harm. Economically, they are essentially the mafia who has founded their own country but is still operating in all the surrounding countries.
The thing that amazes me is those that picked before 2035. Even if the decision was taken today to have someone walking on mars only a short term suicide mission could be achieved by 2035, something I doubt any government would commit 10's of billions of dollars too.
No government is going to go that route, and no private institution will either. The idea of making things cheap and easy by making a Mars trip one way is just a way to trick people into believing it will make it cheap enough to be possible. Once all the problems to getting a person to Mars and on the ground walking around have been dealt with, getting them back isn't quite trivial, but will be easy enough to tack on as to make no difference.
You don't think trying to create an ecology on Mars (even without terraforming, building some kind of self-sustaining "biodome" there) would teach us valuable lessons that could help us here on Earth?
Why does one have to come before the other? Working on both problems in parallel can provide scientific boons shared across both.
I think he's saying that if we can't create one here, then there is no chance in hell of being able to create on there where things will be orders of magnitude harder and no chance for any fixes in a reasonable time. Saying otherwise would be like saying "We can't get a ship into orbit, so we're going to go straight to the moon."
True, but IT will hope, and hope springs eternal.
Business really. Business just wants what they have and they want it to work till they decide it doesn't. They really don't like external vendors telling them they must upgrade at a cost to their business. However, every time there is a bug fix in vendor software, it is in an upgrade that has new features with new bugs because the vendors are in a feature war with their competition over new customers and it would cost them too much to maintain a stable version as well as a version with new features.
And that's bad because
Well, as Chicago is cold, Texas is hot. It also gets cold, and then there are the tornados. I do miss the thunderstorms though. The chances of getting into a fight simply due to male macho bullshit posturing are much greater in Texas than most of the rest of the country. If you look weird, are weird, or deviate from the WASP norm in any way, this greatly increases your chances of getting into such a fight. One of the reasons Austin gets many of the people that live there is because it is the tolerant part of Texas. Then, it's one big FLAT landscape*. If you're used to mountains and forests, Texas probably isn't for you. Even the ocean experience may leave you wanting. It is very much a car and truck culture, even in the large cities. Expect to always drive everywhere for everything because nothing is in walking distance and there is no mass transit (as compared with the cities this article is contrasting to). Then there is the general southern conservative racist culture that Texas is known for. There are plenty of good people and you'll find people you like, but you'll also have to put up with everybody else.
*OK, I haven't been to Austin. My transmission blew out on my one trip there for SXSW and I never made it. I spent most my time in Dallas and Houston. And for full disclosure, I left 20 years ago.
Why does it have to be "cool", involved with research or a start up as long as it's an IT job that you find interesting?
You also left out the best things about Nashville: no state income taxes and it's not Memphis.
I read and article a few years ago exactly about that subject and Nashville. Simply put, as Nashville could encourage high tech companies to move to Nashville, the companies found that there wasn't enough suitable employees to make it worth their while no matter what the tax benefits. While some people follow the jobs, most people move to where they want to live and then look for a job. As it turned out, Nashville's research showed that getting those high paying jobs into the community was much more a function of encouraging young college grads to remain in the community than encouraging companies to move there. This involves making the city attractive, i.e. "cool", to said young college grads who are not yet worried about families, mortgages, and other stuff but will be after they have already settled down.
What exactly is a "proper windows"?
Something that looks and acts exactly like Win7 so the minimum amount of training, question answering, and redevelopment of programs and workflows will need to be done with the employees. Probably won't happen, but Corp IT can hope because the costs for such are rarely included in computer upgrades (as opposed to application upgrades) and are essentially a drain on resources.
The "mission accomplished" was in reference to defeating Sadam's regime. It had nothing to do with terrorism as a whole.
From Navy people I know, not even that. Every time the carrier comes into port from it's six month (?) tour, it flies the Mission Accomplished banner. It just so happened that this time the President decided to fly in, have a press conference, and take advantage of it.
Make it right before you make it faster.