Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Submission Summary: 0 pending, 4 declined, 1 accepted (5 total, 20.00% accepted)

+ - Strip searches of the mind: Laptop border searches->

Submitted by
pacergh
pacergh writes "The government can search your laptop with no warrant, probable cause, or reasonable suspicion at the border. Law journal articles have argued that reasonable suspicion should be required. This article examines the origins of this fourth amendment exception and why folks should think about it before traveling abroad."
Link to Original Source
Role Playing (Games)

+ - Why virtual property is really about privacy->

Submitted by pacergh
pacergh (882705) writes "A number of legal commentaries on virtual worlds argue that property laws should extend to the accounts, characters, and virtual stuff in these worlds. The rational is that these virtual resources are valuable and should be protected.

Yet none of these legal commentaries step out of the virtual world metaphor. Each pre-supposes that a property-centric view is the only way to look at these resources.

In a follow-up to The Virtual Property Problem, the article A Virtual Property Solution steps out of the property-metaphor for virtual worlds and examines them for what they are – playgrounds of the mind where harms are not visited upon a gamer’s waller, but rather on a gamer’s mind.

From the abstract, “Privacy laws can protect virtual worlds and their users where property law cannot.” The article goes on to argue that “[t]he very foundation of the virtual is the imagination of each individual player” and that “[v]iewing these harms through the lens of privacy will help lay a framework for the creation of future laws that will work alongside the imagination of the virtual rather than forcing themselves into a virtual world and destroying that world’s very value—the ability to pretend, to imagine, and to escape the real.”"

Link to Original Source
Role Playing (Games)

+ - Virtual property is a bad idea; here is why

Submitted by pacergh
pacergh (882705) writes "Many legal commentaries on virtual property argue that it should exist. Others argue why it can exist. None seem to explicitly spell out what virtual property will look like or how it will affect online worlds.

Lost in the technology love-fest are the problems virtual property might bring. The Virtual Property Problem lays out a model for what virtual property might look like and then applies it to various scenarios. This highlights the problems of carving virtual property out of a game developer's rights in his creation.

From the abstract, "'Virtual property' is a solution looking for a problem." The article explains the "failure of property rights to benefit the users, developers, and virtual resources of virtual worlds.""
Role Playing (Games)

+ - What rights do we have in MMOG gold/accounts?->

Submitted by
pacergh
pacergh writes "A new legal paper argues against extending property rights to virtual stuff.

"Extending the common law of property to virtual objects and virtual worlds deprives the people who own the hardware running virtual worlds the right to control their own property. Such an extension results in conversion through conversion — the property interests of the virtual world's creator, the hardware and intellectual property supporting the world, become subject to a new virtual commons. This removes the freedom of virtual world creators to design worlds of their own imaginings. In addition, it will have a chilling effect on the creation of new virtual worlds."

People buy and sell World of Warcraft gold and accounts. Before WoW, people bought and sold Ultima Online gold, weapons, and accounts. Heck, I know I've maybe bought some WoW gold in my day. But the question is what kind of rights do we gamers have in the stuff we use in the online games we play? And what kind of rights do the developers have, or should have?"

Link to Original Source

Time sharing: The use of many people by the computer.

Working...