Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

[ Create a new account ]

overshoot (39700)

overshoot
  (email not shown publicly)
by Original Replica on Saturday June 21, @04:03PM (#23886913)
Attached to: Studies Confirm That Bad Boys Get More Girls
as they talk to their "nice" guy friends about how they wish they could just find a "nice" guy, all the while ignoring him to chase the guys they constantly complain about...

Speaking as someone who was a "nice guy" all through highschool, it's the fault of the nice guy as well. Why buy the cow if the milk is free? If a "nice guy" is going to be a "good friend" and supply emotional support/fulfillment then the cute girl doesn't have to have that need met by her conceited prick boyfriend. Girls who date pricks will always want to have a nice guy friend, because girls need emotional fulfillment in the same way that guys need sexual fulfillment. So all you nice guys out there stop giving it away for free, get your needs met as well or get out of that relationship. When they say "you're so nice, why can't the guys I date be more like you?" point out that emotionally they are dating you, they just happen to be fucking someone else.
+ -
 [+] comment
by hawk on Thursday June 05, @12:03AM (#23661639)
Attached to: Jack Thompson Walks Out On Hearing
I am a lawyer, but this isn't legal advice. If this even *could* apply to you, you would already be a lawyer . . .

Ten years is unusual. I'm not even sure I've ever *heard* of "enhanced disbarment" before.

By its nature, disbarment is permanent. In many (most?) states, an attorney can petition to be considered for lifting of disbarment after five years--but has a heavy burden; he must show that he is no longer a danger if allowed to practice. The fact that he is a danger was established prior to disbarment; disputing it would end the possibility of showing the needed change.

Ten years, however . . . and that does *not* mean he gets the license back then, only that that is the earliest date at which he *could* request it and attempt to show fitness . . .

hawk, esq.
+ -
 [+] comment

  Landshark Cage Match[->] 2008-05-01 21:42 overshoot

Submitted by overshoot on Thursday May 01, @09:42PM
overshoot writes "From the "it couldn't happen to nicer people" division of the "a plague on both your houses" department: The Church of Scientology's premier Cruise ship seems to have an asbestos problem — that they've been literally sweeping under the carpet for more than 20 years. Asbestos lawyers all over the place must be cranking out class-action boilerplate at this moment for everyone who's been aboard since the ship was renovated two decades ago.

Popcorn, anyone?"

http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/746423/scientology_flagship_impounded_in_the.html
+ -
 [+] submission, news, court

  What happened to OpenMoko? 2007-12-19 14:37 overshoot

Submitted by overshoot on Wednesday December 19 2007, @02:37PM
overshoot writes "Does anyone know what happened to OpenMoko? First they were going to have development hardware last December, then it slipped to February, with commercial availability in June, then the development units showed up in the summer but the consumer devices were going to be available in October. Well, my calendar says October was two months ago, the website hasn't been updated since July, and I'm still lusting after that phool fone."
+ -
 [+] submission, hardware, cellphones

  The Clueless Newbie Rudes Again 2007-05-15 00:48 overshoot

Submitted by overshoot on Tuesday May 15 2007, @12:48AM
overshoot writes "Anyone remember The Clueless Newbie's Linux Odyssey? It may still hold the record as the longest flamewar /. ever had. Well, as it happens, she's come back to have a go at Ubuntu Feisty. Don't say you haven't been warned."
+ -
 [+] submission, os

  Hearts and Minds 2007-05-14 17:49 overshoot

Submitted by overshoot on Monday May 14 2007, @05:49PM
overshoot writes "I hate to break the news, but the /. readership isn't all that important politically. The people who really count are the over-65 set, who have money and (more important) actually vote. Which is why I was totally floored last week.

I was chatting with my (over 80) mother on the way to a University graduation party for two of my kids when, in response to a rather innocuous comment, she let loose with a rant about how patents and copyright have to change before they ruin the country. Now, this is a woman who has been a Republican for her entire adult life and for years was a loyal party worker — by no means a child of the 60s (that's me, actually.)

So, I'll ask: how many of us have actually talked about the IP wars with our past-retirement-age family? Is there a profound public perception change happening that the noisy (as in, you and me) /. set haven't noticed because we're making too much noise ourselves?"
+ -
 [+] submission, yro, usa