Fair enough. Looks like I put too much trust in
Also it seems that they were phasing out the paper tax discs rather than running out.
Incidentally, those Subaru engines might be "lacklustre" but they have amazingly flat curves and they have a massive assload of headroom left in them.
Which leads to pretty lacklustre times, 0-100, 80-120, 1/4 mile.
Dont get me wrong however, if someone told me that they wanted a fun car, my first response would be "get a GT86" in my best Jeremy Clarkson accent. It is a cornering machine.
Sure there's plenty of potential... but the thing about potential is that you need to work to unlock it. As the owner of a Silvia S15, let me say mods are expensive if you want them done well enough not to blow up the car you're spending thousands on improving. Its not as simple as bolting on a turbo, your suspension and anti-roll bars need to be reworked at a minimum.
The Subaru FA engine is of course, a fantastic engine, it's the same engine that goes into the WRX some STI's. But these both have turbochargers. The FA20 the Toyobaru twins _is_ a WRX engine without a turbocharger. Many have argued, as you have that the 86/BRZ are the 180's (Silvia S13) of their day. A light weight, highly modifiable, extremely reliable sports car for the masses... And I buy that argument completely, certainly a flat 4 sounds fantastic (a hell of a lot better than the SR20DET in a 180). But Toyota and Subaru should have turbocharged it from the word go. Toyota's FT86 concept was turbocharged but I guess Subaru didn't want it competing too much with the WRX.
If you maintain a Subaru with a manual transmission well, you can expect it to really hold up.
This needs to be said again. A basically maintained Subi will go for donkeys years.
32 GB "absolute minimum" and 80 GB recommended? An additional 20 GB per year because of updates? Are you butt-fucking kidding me? Do you Microsofties ever take a peek at the competition? Has it never occurred to you that this is not normal or even reasonable?
As a sysadmin who deals with both Windows and Linux (Debian and Red Hat mainly) I can say that most vendors seriously over estimate their minimum requirements for servers. 40 GB is plenty for a 2008 R2 server, 60 if you're feeling generous.
An extra 20 GB for 40 servers is 800 GB on tier 0 storage (and yes, for these 40 servers they are required to be on SSD).
Its not just MS, regularly see tiny little packages designed for accounting or some such that have stupid requirements for a low number of users. Some things like a full version of MSSQL server, 8 cores, 16 GB of RAM and it only deals with about 10 GB of data, even some Linux applications that specify it must be a physical (and they'll refuse to help you if you install it on a virtual). Its sloppy testing and sloppy marketing.
As I said, in 2014 Microsoft finally admitted that the growing WinSxS folder was a concern and created a way to clean it up. It shrunk my 19GB down to just under 2. I understand why Windows needs to keep some old assemblies, but they dont need to keep all of them.
Meanwhile I've been running the same Windows 7 install since the tail end of 2009. That's with a fuckton of install, uninstall, and the occasional defrag and registry cleaning, especially on this tiny 120GB disk. Still runs exactly as it did back then.
Its entirely possible you're slowing down at the same pace as your machine.
Yes, but this is why you give
Great idea in theory, right until a Dev decides to put the log files out to
Take a look at a Black and Tan.
Which is on the top: the Irish or the British.
perhaps the rest of the Common Market would have gone back to the old Roman measure?
A pound (livre/whatever) of silver being divided into 20 units, each of which was divided into 12 pennies was hardly a British development.
>We have a certain failed Mars probe to prove the case.
You mean the one that slammed into the ground because some idiot used metric units instead of real ones and miscalculated the thrust?
Nah, it's just inflation.
Kind of like how a buck used to get you a great burger, but now only the dregs of the menu.
Two enormous rocky-ice things in orbit around one another used to be enough to get you a planet, but no longer . . .
hawk, pretty sure that it's not about a disney trademark . . .
"Water freezes at zero and boils at one hundred. What could be simpler?"
0 is a cold winter day, and 100 is a hot summer day.
That means the base system will be different for Yellowknife, Canada and Darwin, Australia as a winters day in Darwin is warmer than the summer in Yellowknife. With Metric we know that if it's 14 degrees C, we know that its going to be a bit chilly and to wear a jacket no matter where in the world you are.
I drive a Subaru WRX/STi, and I've been pulled over once. When they realized I was over 40 and not a 17 year old with a souped up car they got really disappointed. I didn't get a ticket but they did say that my license plate frame was crooked.
In Australia you get what we call "the personality test" which is whether a cop decides to give you a ticket or not.
If you go around with a "Fuck tha Po-leece" attitude you'll find the police are quite obliging but you'll also figure out that when you fuck the police, the police won't be the "taker". If you're polite and civil, you're more likely to drive away with a bollocking rather than a ticket.
I get messed with the cops at least every other time I take my 94 Supra out. It isn't fun. The worst is being tailgated by a county cop. Going through a town or two and they are still on your ass sucks. Not that I'm doing anything wrong, but it's still the annoyance because you know they are going to pop you for SOMETHING.
I drive a Nissan 200sx (Silvia S15) and when a cop starts tailgating me (rare but it happens, some cops are just jerks). I pull over and let them pass. Very few cops will call that bluff.
You've got to be doing something wrong to be getting the cops attention every single time. Cops usually pick on people that are driving erratically (or in laymans terms, driving like a cock).
But I also keep a dash camera as insurance. I hate he-said/she-said arguments.
Probably. Considering the BRZ is practically a copy of the FR-S, I don't expect too many people who want to buy a Subaru sports car is going to get one that looks the same as a piece of crap Scion.
The Subaru BRZ and Toyota 86 are the same car. It was a joint venture between Toyota and Subaru (hence the car is referred to as the Toyobaru or sometimes Subiota). Toyota did the body, electrics and suspension, Subaru put did the engine.
Unfortunately, the flat 4 boxers that Subaru produce have always been lacklustre without a turbocharger. A nice high revving honda K series would have been a better choice if they had to be NA but they wouldn't have been able to make the car as low as it is (flat engines are well, rather flat, normal inline 4's tend to be taller).
What's the point of doing more than 65 on a congested highway? 65 will get you there in about the same time as zoom stop zig zag zoom stop zoom stop and be more pleasant, save fuel, and not call attention from the police.
This, not only will weaving in and out of lanes use more fuel and is a lot more frustrating, it's slower.
If you drive down the same bit of highway every day, you should figure out which lanes move faster and how best to use this to your advantage. I drive down a stretch of road each day where the right lane is congested (Australia is an RHD country, so the right lane is an overtaking lane) so the left lane is moving faster. I have to take a right to get onto the road that my work is on. Rather than trying to push into traffic I just go straight through the lights and take the next right. Sure I have to come back but it's actually faster because there's very little traffic on that road despite being longer.
Facts are stubborn, but statistics are more pliable.