"It is a fair summary of constitutional history that the landmarks of our liberties have often been forged in cases involving not very nice people." - Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter
Speaks volumes about the
Are you suggesting they are unrepentant White Knights?
She's a witch! BURN HER!
The difference is the founder of Christianity was against killing people unlike Mohammed.
If by "early adopter" you mean "drooling, clueless moron", then yes, your translation is correct.
It can't be compiled by me, from source code.
Iain M. Banks - the last "true Scotsman" of sci fi authors. He will be missed. Nobody comes close.
"Well regulated", relevant or not, means well equipped and trained. Always has. Not sure what you think it means, you haven't said.
As far as "consequences" go, the states with the strongest laws have the highest incidence of violent crime.
You sure you want to trot out the fallacy that prohibition is effective? Didn't work out very well for alcohol, utterly failed for MJ.
The definition of "well regulated" has not changed, and Heller/McDonald specifically dismantle the infantile "militia" argument:
[T]he activities [the Amendment] protects are not limited to militia service, nor is an individual's enjoyment of the right contingent upon his or her continued or intermittent enrollment in the militia.
Furthermore, under US v. Miller, the 2nd Amendment covers arms "commonly used for self defense", which certainly does not exclude "military" weapons, especially since the 2A specifically protected state of the art (at the time) firearms equipped by infantry.
There is basically nothing about your post which is even remotely factual - just typical partisan whining.
You'd also have to convince the AI to not actually try to learn anything new, or it might actually try to confirm that the things you assert are, in fact, true (or at least that you've given it non-obvious, falsifiable truisms to follow).
The OP assumes religious beliefs is emotional and irrational. That's false. Discussion over.
Agreed, religious beliefs are emotional and irrational.
Nobody should worship anybody based on faith.
It all started with corporate "enterprise" firewall vendors who saw a demand for MiTM-in-a-box from "enterprise" IT.
Corporations are notoriously uninterested in the repercussions of their actions.
This fine bloatware didn't merely act as an MiTM, it do so so incompetently that it exposed the user to basically any MiTM attack on an SSL connection(the root cert it used to sign bogus certificates was identical across every installation and effectively unprotected and the MiTM component would re-sign any cert handed to it, even an invalid one, opening the user to downright trivial MiTM attacks.
Many "enterprise" (lol) class proxies (deployed by corporations to "protect" their internal networks") do the exact same thing.
Allowing unrestricted remote access to your machine's trusted root CA list via GP is a feature of windows.
Why would they remove it? It is for the "enterprise".