Instead of flash memory soldered to the board, microSD is ubiquitous and cheap -- and makes the device effectively unbrickable. Sure, there are bootloaders with recovery features, but it's not as simple as writing a new image to SD. Raspberry Pi got it right in this department. It's a shame there's no PCIe bus on the raspi...
Perhaps Statler and Waldorf...
On the other hand, I've setup three boxes w/ pfSense in the past year, and each has been stable and good to me. The gui is certainly more cryptic than DD-WRT, but it's also far more powerful (as it should be, as it's running on beefier hardware). I've run it on an old P4 (the never ending supply of SFF Dell P4 desktops are good for this), but for something more efficient (and fanless) I've also installed it on inexpensive Atom-based boxes. Still more energy (and more expensive) than a ARM-based device, but the features and stability have been worth it. For WiFi, I just use an inexpensive AP-only device
Link to Original Source
Pau Oliva Fora, a security researcher for the firm Via Forensics, published a small, proof of concept module on GitHub (https://gist.github.com/poliva/36b0795ab79ad6f14fd8) that exploits the flaw in the way Android verifies the authenticity of signed mobile applications. The flaw was first disclosed last week by Jeff Forristal, the Chief Technology Officer at Bluebox Security, ahead of a presentation at the Black Hat Briefings in August. (https://securityledger.com/2013/07/flaw-leaves-900m-android-devices-vulnerable/). It affects versions of Android going back four years.
The simple program leverages APKTool, a common, open source tool for reverse engineering Android applications – decompiling and then recompiling their contents. His script allows a user to select and then decompile a legitimate Android application and then recompile it, creating an altered, “malicious” APK that will have the same, cryptographic signature as the original file. In an e-mail statement, Google said that a patch for Forristal’s vulnerability was provided to Google’s OEM (original equipment manufacturer) and carrier partners in March, and that some (Samsung) have already shipping a patched version of Android to customers. However, that response hasn't been universal — a reflection of Android's fragmented install base. (https://securityledger.com/2013/03/android-ecosystem-still-fragmented-insecure/)
Link to Original Source
This adapter is often a device that must match the type of cable system your provider runs
I was under the impression that this was under the umbrella of the CableLabs OpenCable spec, which means, in theory, it'd be a standard. And, hey, what about (I should think twice before mentioning this, but here goes nothing...) True2Way?
Btw, the fact that you even need one pretty much confirms your cable system is crap...
I'm not usually one to defend my cable company, but I'll make an exception this time. The current implementation of SDV is crap, yes. But the infrastructure is most certainly not. So instead of wasting millions of dollars to upgrade, we use what we have now and fit as much as we can. Besides, practically speaking, building a better infrastructure won't give me anything I don't have now, except a higher cable bill.
1) Lower your damn prices already! You'd have people beating down the doors if you'd lower your monthly fee to $5/month, and you'd still be making good money to boot!
2) Stop treating your old customers as second-class citizens! The old Tivos work just fine, so why aren't you porting new features to these units? Even UI/UX improvements which take negligible CPU or memory usage are never implemented. Sure, there are a lot of lifetime account holders, but you're still collecting monthly fees on some of these, right?
3) Integrate the "tuning adapter" for switched digital video to inside the Tivo. The fact that I need such a thing in the first place is ridiculous.
4) Lower your damn prices already! $60 for a wireless G dongle? $90 for an N wireless bridge?! C'mon!
5) What's the deal with CableCard, anyway? Are cable companies going to continue to support this? What about users of IP-based services, like AT&T's U-verse?
6) Don't get me started on copy-protection...
7) Lower your damn prices already! $5/mo -- it's worth repeating!
12 hours and only 37 comments? The response to a device like this should be far greater on a site like Slashdot. *Sigh*.
Anyway, I've always felt TAPR kits were not entirely within my grasp due to either high prices or high complexity. I hope this will be an affordable kit which doesn't require a ton of SMD soldering. Take the lead from Raspberry Pi - small, simple, affordable hardware.
Good luck! I'll see you guys at Dayton!
A person can believe in a god, belong to a religious community, and integrate that belief and community into their daily lives without it becoming obsessive and/or intrusive. In my book, that's what lets science and religion remain compatible.
Can she become a competent civil engineer and build bridges as well as the next person? Probably. A talented chemist? Sure. You're right, it is a big house. But if she can find the devil in an RFID badge, I'm wondering what else she'll shun because of a religious concern. That's the shadow I'm talking about.
Off topic? Given that it's the protesters PRIMARY ARGUMENT, it seems pretty damn on topic to me.
Anyway, I find it difficult to reconcile the religious aspect of her argument with the fact that she's attending a science and engineering based magnet school. I'm not saying that religion and science are inherently incompatible, but I am saying that her equating an RFID badge to the "mark of the beast" makes me think her devotion to her religion will place a shadow over her science education.
FWIW, the article says the school offered to disable the electronic portion of the badge, but that the school requires the parents to stop protesting. I would love to hear the school's side of this story.
I'm all for this, especially living in a 2nd-class city (when it comes to concerts). But just as important as getting artists to play here is removing Ticketmaster from the equation. Could this mean the ticket price is what you pay, no more hidden service fees, etc.? No more monopoly by one ticket service? I won't get my hopes up... surely TM will just buy them if they show any sign of doing well.
Wordperfect was *the* standard word processor in the late 80's/early 90's. When Microsoft's Word 2.0 came out, with a beautiful GUI and no more finger-contorting F-key combos which required a chart to use, it **blew away** Wordperfect. Excel's inline graphs, expression helper, and crazy-easy cell formatting **blew away** Quattro Pro. Access' drag and drop table linking, virtually automatic query generation, and included example dbs and help system **blew away** Paradox/Dbase. It was a revolution that Microsoft ushered in. For most laypeople, it wasn't just cool, it was near magic. First they made "cool" killer apps when others were stagnant and relying upon their entrenched position to keep up sales. And then they put in place anti-competitive agreements with OEMs to make sure they kept their position.
In the late 90's, Microsoft was no longer cool for end users, but for developers and their associated sales force, they sure were. Devs were EXCITED to use MS's development tools and languages (VB/C++/Interdev/etc.). It was cheap to get started, plus there were a ton of resources for cheap training. SQL Server had easy hooks into all of the MS stuff, and watching a five minute demo on linking a SQL Server db to your web app was powerful. A new generation of IT admins preferred Windows NT's GUI to command line Solaris/Irix/AIX/etc. This was all backed by the ease of becoming a Microsoft partner, which would mean a steady flow of sales leads to your shop. For better or worse, their technologies revolutionized a whole generation of developers who thought MS was cool. First they had cool tools when others were stagnant and relying upon their entrenched position to keep up sales. Then they used shady, anti-competitive tactics to keep that position.
All I'm saying is that they were perceived as cool at one point. I'm also saying that I'm glad that era looks to be over.
(1) Good on them for going closed source.
Wait... what? So, let me paraphrase: "Yay on closed source! Now, get out of my way while I find something open source..."
Entitlement Generation? I must have missed the part where the poster said something about expecting it for free.
Even with its flaws, I'm thankful to have a fast Internet connection at all. But it could be much better.