Forgot your password?

Comment: Re:the internet is growing up (Score 1) 71

by nmoore (#47237827) Attached to: Nominet Compromising UK WHOIS Privacy, Wants To See Gov't-Issued ID

The water rights aren't necessarily owned by the government, but by the people downstream who were using the water before you—maybe a municipal water system, but just as likely a farmer, an industrial plant, etc. By capturing rainwater you would be infringing on their private property rights in that water.

Colorado, in 2009, began issuing permits for residential rainwater collection, in part because of a study that showed that in some locations most rainwater evaporated or was used by plants before it reached a stream.

Comment: Re: In the US they'd have been charged (Score 3, Insightful) 378

Before they did anything beyond twisting the doorknob (entering the default password), they got permission.

"He said that wasn't really possible and we don't have any proof that we did it.

"I asked them: 'Is it all right for us to get proof?'

"He said: 'Yeah, sure, but you'll never be able to get anything out of it.'"

That said, twisting the doorknob is probably an offense under the CFAA.

Comment: If users blindly follow ISP instructions (Score 1) 177

by nmoore (#46317949) Attached to: Most Alarming: IETF Draft Proposes "Trusted Proxy" In HTTP/2.0
How would most users respond if their ISP told them "You must add these certificates to your browser" (with instructions, or even a little installer program)? They could then use their bogus CA to MitM every use of facebook/google/whatever.

This seems no different, since it's up to the browser (not just the ISP) to enable the trusted proxy stuff. If a browser enables it without your consent (just as if they deliberately add a bogus CA to the trusted cert list), the browser is being evil and needs to be fixed. If it is left to the user, who enables it without understanding, that's unfortunate, but no worse than what can currently happen.

+ - Google Has $100 for Girls Who Study Coding, $0 for Boys 1

Submitted by theodp
theodp (442580) writes ""Thanks to Google," reads the Codecademy website (image), "every U.S. public high school girl who completes this 15-hour JavaScript curriculum will receive a $100 gift code, which can be applied to a project requesting awesome resources for public school classrooms." Boys need not apply? You got it. Codecademy explains, "Why just girls? Currently only 12% of computer science graduates are women, and great tech companies like Google want to see more smart girls like you enter this awesome profession!" Sorry, Charlie. " gift codes will be distributed only to girls," further explains the text accompanying the I'm-a-girl-at-a-U.S.-public-high-school checkbox, "but we'd love for boys to learn to code as well!" A recent FastCompany piece on DonorsChoose promoted by Melinda Gates suggests boys won't get too far protesting this promo or other girl-friendlier DonorsChoose partnerships with and Google — the non-profit reportedly has two words for critics of its tactics: 'Screw You.'"

Comment: The point is to be sued (Score 2) 119

by nmoore (#44668457) Attached to: Former Lockheed Skunkworks Engineer Auctioning a Prototype "Spy Rock"
Perry says:

I am auctioning this off for the stated price to fund a legal team in DC dig into my dismissal from the company and to determine where the AWA intellectual property went after the demise of AWA.

And what is the interesting part of the auction? A backup CD full of AWA intellectual property. If someone sues him over selling that CD and infringing upon their IP, then he knows who currently owns the IP, and he can in discovery find out how they obtained it—providing the evidence needed to file his own lawsuit.

It sounds like a bit of a gamble, though: What if, say, the customer lists and the patents went to different places? Then the owners of the former could sue him, but he would not get the information he's looking for.

Comment: Hoax (Score 1) 1

I found the answer oddly specific, particularly given that I was answering about my native dialect, not the common dialect in the place I live. Trying again with completely different answers, followed by looking at the page source, confirmed my suspicions: it uses GeoIP, completely ignoring your responses.

"And do you think (fop that I am) that I could be the Scarlet Pumpernickel?" -- Looney Tunes, The Scarlet Pumpernickel (1950, Chuck Jones)