Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

+ - Standard Software Development Environments 3

Submitted by sftwrdev97
sftwrdev97 (2481648) writes "I have only been doing software development for about 5 years, and worked most of it at one company. I recently switched to a new company and am amazed at the lack of technology used in their development process. In my previous position, we used continuous integration, unit testing, automated regression testing, an industry standard (not open source) in version control, and tried to keep up with the latest tools, Java releases, etc.
In the new position, there is no unit or regression testing, no continuous integration, compiled files are moved to the production environment basically by hand and there is no version control on them. The tools we are using have been unsupported for 5-7 years and we are still using old Java.
I am just wondering since this is only my second job in the industry, is this the norm for most development environments? Or do most development environments try to keep up on technology or just use what ever gets them by?"
Earth

+ - Who's Bankrolling the Climate-Change Deniers? 1

Submitted by
Hugh Pickens writes
Hugh Pickens writes writes "Bryan Walsh writes in Time Magazine that climate denialism exists in part because there has been a long-term, well-financed effort on the part of conservative groups and corporations to distort global-warming science. "The blows have been struck by a well-funded, highly complex and relatively coordinated denial machine," say sociologists Riley Dunlap and Aaron McCright. Fossil-fuel companies like Exxon and Peabody Energy — which obviously have a business interest in slowing any attempt to reduce carbon emissions — have combined with traditionally conservative corporate groups like the US Chamber of Commerce and conservative foundations like the Koch brothers' Americans for Prosperity, to raise doubts about the basic validity of what is, essentially, a settled scientific truth. The naysayers seem to be following the playbook written by the tobacco industry in its long, ongoing war against medical findings about the dangers of smoking. For both Big Oil and Big Smoke, that playbook is lethally simple: don't straight-up refute the science, just raise skepticism and insist that the findings are "unsettled" and that "more research" is necessary."

Comment: Re:Legally Binding? (Score 0) 119

by nick79au (#34509180) Attached to: The First Truly Honest Privacy Policy
Not necessarily, though it probably depends on the jurisdiction you're in. For example Australia implemented changes to consumer law that crack down on 'unfair terms', with the courts deciding if a term is unfair or not. I'm not sure if that results in the whole contract being nullified or if it only applies to that particular term though.

A language that doesn't have everything is actually easier to program in than some that do. -- Dennis M. Ritchie

Working...