Forgot your password?

Comment: Re:I can simply ignore all health and diet advice (Score 1) 288

by neurovish (#47881335) Attached to: Link Between Salt and High Blood Pressure 'Overstated'

Just about everything that is bad for you today is being negated a few years later. Can't find the link today, but at one point "research" showed that jeans were responsible for higher risk of cancer. So I will just continue to live my life and enjoy it to the fullest. If something kills me, at least I had a good time.

I remember that one...I was in middle school at the time. In response, I refused to wear denim for a couple years until I realized that it really didn't make any sense sometime in high school.

Comment: Re:How quickly will they run back to Oracle? (Score 1) 197

acid isn't so important when the unit is a patient's records. there is also no need for a rigid data model.

Is today opposite day? Of all the bits of my life stored in databases, I think my medical records and financial data are the two where I absolutely want those things.

Comment: Re:How quickly will they run back to Oracle? (Score 1) 197

I can't help but get the feeling that within a few months they'll be running back to Oracle or some other real database system.

At this point, anyone who works with databases in industry knows that "NoSQL" has come to mean inconsistent data, corrupted data, and silently lost data.

One just can't throw away atomicity, consistency, isolation and durability without running into some serious problems.

And that's totally ignoring how it becomes damn near impossible effectively query NoSQL databases. Sorry, writing complex queries in some imperative subset of JavaScript is totally the wrong way of doing things. Intentionally not learning SQL takes more effort than learning how to use it!

I was hoping to learn why/how they might be doing this somewhere in this thread, because their implementation seems to be the exact thing that you want a relational database for, and not where NoSQL shines. I also don't see what implementation they used since NoSQL is pretty non-descriptive, and at this point seems to basically mean that they aren't using Oracle, DB2, MySQL, Postgres, or MSSQL.

Comment: Re:Holy shit! (Score 1) 197

Whilst I'm all for open source in government, I can;t help thinking every time they come out with press releases saying "we used " describes a process where being different with the technology stack is an end in itself.
You could write an open source application in C++ rather than the much less mainstream R language and you'd have lots of people ready skilled to maintain it. Using R just seems like it was the choice of the devs who persuaded the agency to adopt their tools rather than an agency who thought about what they needed up front.

I wonder in 5 years if we see headlines "Immigration Agency dumps open source for Oracle. A spokeperson said,'we used a bunch of obscure languages and tools for the old system that served us well we had difficult finding people skilled in them, so we successfully outsourced the system to our new partners who will deliver increased performance and efficiency savings over.blah blah blah". If they'd done it "maturely" in the first place, this kind of nightmare scenario wouldn't happen.

(and I speak of experience - currently discussing details with a company that has a system "built with a mix of Erlang, Scala and Ruby on Rails". You know its been cobbled together by a bunch of hacks more interested in whatever language seemed coolest at the time.

R isn't obscure, and for statistical analysis and data analytics is more likely the Right Tool for the Job. I was helping my stats friends in college setup Linux desktops and servers for R 14 years ago, so it isn't really a trendy language du jour either.
Your Erlang, Scala, and Ruby on Rails system sounds like a nightmare though.

Comment: Re:Holy shit! (Score 1) 197

Is this a big IT project that actually worked? Where's my fainting couch???

Here's another one. Wonder what they have in common?

What Immigration did with just $1m and open source software

The Department of Immigration has showed what a cash-strapped government agency can do with just $1 million, some open source software, and a bit of free thinking.

Speaking at the Technology in Government forum in Canberra yesterday, the Department's chief risk officer Gavin McCairns explained how his team rolled an application based on the 'R' language into production to filter through millions of incoming visitors to Australia every year.

Despite working for one of the largest bodies in Canberra - and one of the most security conscious - McCairns put his endorsement firmly behind the use of open source.

I'm going to wager that the open source project successes are more due to the people involved than open source itself. Usually when somebody does that they have an open source cheerleader in a position of influence and a staff already familiar with open source. So you end up with a project led by somebody who is invested in the project's success at a level beyond "this will make the bosses happy". From my limited experience, the proprietary implementations result from those influential people going "we don't know how to do this, but this is what everybody else seems to be doing, and these guys we are paying to tell us what to do are saying to do that". The open source project is much more likely to have implementers and architects with more of a "let's figure this out" attitude instead of "this is what people say to do".

Comment: Re:So what exactly is the market here. (Score 1) 729

by neurovish (#47864797) Attached to: Apple Announces Smartwatch, Bigger iPhones, Mobile Payments

A gigantic set of the population is no longer even used to the concept of wearing a watch, because they have their phone. This device doesn't replace their phone. What exactly is the reason to have this as well, as opposed to pulling your phone out of your pocket?

Unless some company comes up with a functionally independent wearable device that replaces the need for keeping your phone with you I do not see the appeal. I don't understand what the pitch is supposed to even be. Literally every functionality can be responded to with "but i have my phone right here, it also does that and better"

Isn't it inconvenient to keep pulling something out of your pocket whenever you want to check the time though? Wouldn't it be better if you could do the same exact thing by just looking at your wrist?

Comment: Re:The comments in this thread are embarrassing. (Score 1) 587

by neurovish (#47806807) Attached to: Low-Carb Diet Trumps Low-Fat Diet In Major New Study

Someone posts a scientific article about dieting and everyone posts their wild unproven theories about dieting.

If I wanted to read wild speculation by uninformed nobodies I can find that elsewhere.

For my money, slashdot is the best source of wild speculation by uninformed nobodies though.

Comment: Re:My weight loss diet last January (Score 1) 587

by neurovish (#47806795) Attached to: Low-Carb Diet Trumps Low-Fat Diet In Major New Study

But...what was your body composition like at 230lbs? How tall are you? If you're short and quite fat at 230, then such a diet will drop a lot quick, then level out and not do much from there. It's the zone between "overweight" and "fit" that is hard to cross. That's where you need to moderate what you eat along with activity since either one on its own will only get you so far.

I'm about 6' and can bounce between 210 and 195 or so pretty easily on diet alone and just mountain biking on the weekends, maybe jog a few miles a day or two during the week. I didn't below 190 until I started excersizing during the week regularly along with moderating my diet. On the diet side, I did nothing extreme, just got used to eating smaller portions, only eat out once or twice a week, and for the rest of the time cook stuff I make at home. On the excersize front, I try to either run 2.5 miles or so each day or swim 500 yards (not so great with the swimming yet) in addition to mountain biking on the weekends. Weight-wise, I'm pretty steady in the low 180s with high 170s sometimes, but I would still classify myself as "out of shape" and certainly not really fit. I'll save that for when I can run a 5k before breakfast without feeling tired, or swim those 500 yards without feeling like I'm going to drown at the end.

Comment: Re:The diet is unimportant... (Score 1) 587

by neurovish (#47806515) Attached to: Low-Carb Diet Trumps Low-Fat Diet In Major New Study

You do realize you just made all that up... right?

I repeat my standing point that prior to modern times people were not fat and often ate lots of carbs. In fact, carbs are the staple calories of the entire modern world and have been for thousands of years.

Wheat, Rice, Potatoes, Maize... notice a pattern here?

That is what the modern world has been eating since the dawn of recorded time. Carbs. Where they fat? Nope.

What changes? The food? Nope. The activity? Yep. So... logically what caused this issue?

The activity.

End of discussion.

No, a lot changed. Everything you see and touch and do today, as yourself "did they have this way back when people weren't fat"? Food, activity, daily life. People also did not regularly stay up until 3am, so perhaps that is the problem.

Comment: Re:Too simple (Score 2) 587

by neurovish (#47806429) Attached to: Low-Carb Diet Trumps Low-Fat Diet In Major New Study

That is why even organic meat contains sugar and all kinds of syrup nowadays.

Uh, what? Only processed foods, and then frankly, almost none of them. The lack of unnecessary ingredients is part of the draw to most Organic brands. Only the fake-ass organics like "O" (Safeway's brand) are full of bullshit like that.

There isn't any regulation around "unneccesary ingredients" in regards to organic foods. It mostly just means they aren't GMO and have used approved fertilizers and pesticides, which are about as toxic as the synthetic ones. Organic lunchmeat is still organic as long as the sugar and syrup it's loaded with is also organic.

Doesn't say anything about "no additives", only that any additives need to follow the same certification.

Comment: Re:Development cycle (Score 2) 232

by neurovish (#47775113) Attached to: How Red Hat Can Recapture Developer Interest

Agile developers expect agile everything. Ubuntu happens to just be a happy compromise between agile and waterfall.

If you look at RHEL, it's 5-10 year old packages, kept alive by an enormous engineering team that backports fixes to old, dead software, which creates a huge pile of technical debt for any developer trying to use "modern", highly modular frameworks.

As far as developers go, In the Ruby, Python, and Node ecosystems, anything that's not the latest doesn't exist. They don't use the system package management, they use gem, pip, and npm. They really don't care about the underlying OS, until it gets in the way, and getting in the way is exactly what a decade-old OS does.

Just to throw out an example. Take some modern ruby on rails application, say Discourse. ( Go download a tarball from github. Now try to make it work with nothing but software from the official RHEL repository. Let me know how that works out for you. After you tear out all your hair and skin trying to do that, try to get the pieces from 3rd party repos that will make that work. See how much you have to bring in as far as new libraries and new packages just to make it work. It's still a nightmare even with the 3rd party repos, and that RHEL support contract doesn't cover them - every single piece that's likely to break your application, is now outside of your support agreement, so your company is now wasting at least $799/year for support.

Here you go, seems straightforward and easy enough:

If modern, highly modern frameworks are interested in getting into the big enterprise space, then they will dedicate the time to making their software work with RHEL. If a company is running Ubuntu in production, then they don't particularly care that much about stability, have a small server install base, or a team that can hack around enough to make things work.

Comment: Re:IT departments, on the other hand... (Score 1) 232

by neurovish (#47774901) Attached to: How Red Hat Can Recapture Developer Interest

From working in Linux-based IT for nearly a decade now, IT departments get very frustrated by Red Hat's package management and the concept of needing both an Entitlement and various Channels to get updates; on the flip side of this summary is Ubuntu, which IT departments can't stand due to it's constant change and instable nature. Every IT department I've worked in and with seems to prefer administering and deploying Debian and battles with devs on Ubuntu and management on Red Hat.

How so? Most things these days have gone over to VM, so you buy an unlimited VM license for a host, and there you go. My channels are "Red Hat Enterprise Linux (core server)" and "Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 6)". There are a lot of more esoteric channels, but the core updates are pretty much all you need. If your environment is complex enough that you need packages from the other channels, then it should also be complex enough for Satellite and the extra special red hat sauce to make a point and click Linux enterprise.

To avoid criticism, do nothing, say nothing, be nothing. -- Elbert Hubbard