Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Re:Fighting a smarter enemy (Score 1) 140

by neonv (#43241485) Attached to: Political Pressure Pushes NASA Technical Reports Offline

If you're a citizen, you can have access to it.

Export control information usually involves technology that can be used to create missiles or others armaments. NASA works with rockets, so some of that material may have information involving missiles. It's a good idea to have some control over where that information goes so it doesn't help a hostile entity and come back to us.

+ - Former Obama "digital strategist" accused of Twitter fraud->

Submitted by Zondar
Zondar writes "Former Obama "digital strategist" Brad Schenck has been accused of creating multiple fake Twitter accounts to send pro gun control tweets to members of Congress. One recipient of these tweets, Rep Steve Stockman (R-TX) said his staff noticed identical tweets coming in from multiple Twitter accounts. Of those, a disturbing trend was discovered:

"Stockman said that in response to Obama’s call for people to tweet their congressman in support of gun control legislation, he received just 16 tweets. But he said all of these messages were identical, and that a closer look at them revealed that only six were from real people."

Brad Schenck, Obama's former digital strategist, somehow managed to follow these some or all of the 10 allegedly fake Twitter profiles before they ever sent a tweet or interacted with anyone.

Is this Twitter sockpuppeting? You decide."

Link to Original Source

Comment: Re:Public Comments (Score 1) 105

by neonv (#42890363) Attached to: Scientist Removed From EPA Panel Due To Industry Opposition

In addition, she published a review a few years earlier claiming that the flame retardant should be banned. She had a strong opinion before being appointed to the committee, thus she was biased, and so should have never been appointed. In this case the industry was right. She didn't have an open mind coming in.

Comment: Re:Setting up for iFailure (Score 4, Informative) 114

by neonv (#42885545) Attached to: New Zealand Frontline Police Get Apple Devices in Efficiency Measure

Comment: Re:a little consistency (Score 1) 151

by neonv (#42652907) Attached to: US Activists Oppose US Govt Calls To Weaken EU Privacy Rules

Inviting lots of opinions to a complicated issues is an excellent idea and creates additional insight into the implementation and practical problems that may occur with the laws. There's no reason to ignore an opinion just because it's an opposing opinion. Rather, opposing opinions can bring the most insight information from people that think differently. Europe doesn't have to agree with the US, but the opinions and insight of the US can be very useful.

Comment: Re:No, it won't gain a strong following. (Score 1) 170

by neonv (#42170347) Attached to: In Calculator Arms Race, Casio Fires Back: Color Touchscreen ClassPad

As an engineer, I use math for field work all the time. I usually have a laptop with me that I use matlab on. Though I wouldn't use a graphing calculator now, it was a good middle point in building up to using matlab when I was in school.

Perhaps rather than make powerful calculators, TI and HP should make powerful apps for tablets. Much more useful for buyers, and cheaper to make for TI and HP. It should make everyone happy.

Comment: Re:Pretty Cheap compared to the War on Terror (Score 0) 473

which has exceeded 3 trillion dollars. I'd gladly trade the money spent on war for a stable power grid that doesn't go down at the drop of a leaf

... and you'd have a lot more bombs going off at home, which would probably exceed the cost of fighting it. When someone is shooting at you, sitting and taking it isn't an option. You may not like the war on terror, but ignoring it isn't an option. There isn't a single politician who claims that ignoring it is a good idea.

As far as energy goes, the cost of defending myself from getting blown up by someone that hates me isn't comparable to energy costs.

Patents

+ - It's open season on software patents(and possibly invalidating them) ->

Submitted by
Cutting_Crew
Cutting_Crew writes "I came across an article on Wired that explains the crowd sourcing initiative between Stack Exchange, Google and the US Patent and Trademark Office. The overall purpose gives 3rd parties the ability to search and seek out prior art in an effort to derail pending patents and even invalidate patents that never should have been granted. This effort has led to the Patents on Stack Exchange where you can make a clear case about why a patent shouldn't be accepted or reversed and even submit it to the patent office(with the help of others helping you — that's the whole point!).

I started a thread there that relates to the slashdot story about Words Inc suing Blizzard over 4 patent claims 8,082,501, 7,493,558, 7,945,856 and 7,181,690 whose overall patent claim involves "System and Method for Enabling Users to Interact in a Virtual Space”. I got some good feedback and interest but it was suggested that i take one of the claims and try to offer up evidence of prior art and if I get backing I can start on the others — instead of trying to take on all four patents at once — which are slightly different in their details. If anyone is interested, I need help with coming up with prior art that I might have missed or simply don't know about in addition to the lists of prior art that I declared in my thread.

This is also a good time for all of us to look over other ridiculous software patents that have made its way onto Slashdot before so let the patent hunting begin!"

Link to Original Source

Comment: Re:And What Horrible Things Are You Up To? (Score 3, Interesting) 288

by neonv (#41527267) Attached to: Scientists Want To Keep Their Research Work Out of Court

Research data should be made available to the public for the sake of peer review. Emails and other communication should not be because that would that create a biased opinion for those that read the emails, and emails need freedom to make conjecture without being held to those conjectures for final theories.

Comment: Incorrect Corrections (Score 2) 143

by neonv (#40872743) Attached to: Today, Everybody's a Fact Checker

Even more common than fact checking on web is "incorrectly" fact checking. I don't know how many times I've read one fact on an article just to read another article that claims the opposite is true. Think about reading forums on Slashdot, how many times is a statement corrected, to then be corrected by someone else, to then be corrected, and so on ... which one is true?? Most of the time there's no citations! If there were citations, who actually checks them? From time to time I check citations only to find that the truth is being stretched, or downright reversed from the citation! It's hard to know where truth is, what's being exaggerated, what's only partially true, or more importantly, what's being left out. Everyone has a bias, and everyone manipulates data to prove that bias valid. The only way to get an unbiased opinion is to look at raw data, and very few people have time and ability for that.

Windows

+ - Win8 Tablet Review: Almost Best Of Both Worlds->

Submitted by
jfruh
jfruh writes "Sandro Villinger has been using an iPad as his casual-use computer since it first came out, but he used a loaner Samsung Series 7 tablet running a preview version of Windows 8 — and he liked what he saw. While there were definitely quirks — the long wait for the context menu drove him nuts, and the full OS quickly ate up more disk space than anticipated — he also liked a lot about it. The Metro interface really was a joy, he said, and switching between Metro and the standard Windows desktop was ultimately useful in making the tablet a two-way product."
Link to Original Source

Beware of Programmers who carry screwdrivers. -- Leonard Brandwein

Working...