I don't claim to understand why people like that crap, but based on the fact that it keeps coming out, its apparent they do.
It could place providers in the position of requiring warrants for all law enforcement requests.
Wouldn't that reduce the labor/financial burden on the telcos?
The telcos must be acting at the request of politicians, in exchange for good treatment by the politicians on behalf of the telcos on other unrelated matters.
If you do not want USA to have control over your domain get one in a freedom loving country.
What "freedom loving country" would you suggest? no, this is not an attempt to troll, I'm seriously looking for one.
The fact that he has ANY injury means that his story adds up.
No, it doesn't. The fact that he has an injury only means that there was a fight. It doesn't mean he's telling the truth, and to think that it does mean that would be idiotic.
but on it's most underlying level, an unarmed boy was shot by a large adult with a gun and an arrest wasn't made.
Lets be clear... It was an unarmed boy that the man went to the effort of following down the street against the express suggestions of the 911 dispatcher that was telling him he should not follow him. He WENT TO EXTRA EFFORT to follow the boy and shoot him.