Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).

×

Comment: Re:Privacy != anonymity (Score 1) 368

by n3k5 (#19628745) Attached to: Google May Close Gmail Germany Over Privacy Law

There seem to be way, way, way more instances of spammers, phishing expeditions, fraudsters, character assassins [...] than there are examples of genuinely good things like whistle-blowing and free expression under non-free regimes that might legitimately be protected by anonymity.
And where from do these shady characters get large lists of e-mail addresses, social security numbers, credit card numbers, and the like? From databases that retain such data. In order to combat these problems, it would seem prudent to limit such data retention to the strictly necessary minimum.
User Journal

Journal: yes and no

Journal by n3k5

err, yes, i have a journal. i don't record stuff like where my cat shit last night, which customer annoyed me today or how the party last saturday was. i wouldn't do that, because i can't imagine a situation in which i would want to look that up later, but first of all i wouldn't do it on-line. while i can't imagine a situation in which information like this could be useful in a way i would approve of, i'm aware that there are people out there who read rubbish like that, but i don't want to d

When some people discover the truth, they just can't understand why everybody isn't eager to hear it.

Working...