Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Slashdot Deals: Prep for the CompTIA A+ certification exam. Save 95% on the CompTIA IT Certification Bundle ×

Comment Klump vs. Nazareth High (Score 5, Informative) 1044

Similar cases like this are popping up all over the country. I did some research awhile ago and found a case in Pennsylvania, Klump vs. Nazareth, and the courts actually found the school guilty of violating the students' privacy and constitutional rights by looking at the contents of their phone. This case basically stated that although the school can have a no cell phone use policy, it does not give the school or school officials the privilege to search the contents of the phone at will unless it is believed that the student is using the phone to violate another policy (IE: using the phone to cheat). The point is, in order for any school official to search cell phone contents, the student would have to be violating another policy other than the no cell phone use policy. Being that this case is also in PA, it could be used as case law and charges would most likely be thrown out. PDF here: http://www.paed.uscourts.gov/documents/opinions/06D0400P.pdf
Security

Submission + - PA Online Voter Registration Data Left Unsecure->

mtg169 writes: Anyone in Pennsylvania who has used the SURE Portal System to update their voter registration information or register to vote currently is at risk. A script (PrintVoterApplication.aspx) used to generate PDF files populated with user-submitted information is currently exploitable by simply changing the value of a request ID (ApplicationID), as there is no validation to ensure the ID being requested belongs to the user that is logged in, nor does it even check to see if a user is logged in, allowing anyone on the Internet full access. View linked story for additional exploit details.

I should also note that the SURE Portal Web site has a Privacy Policy including security and an information disclaimer, which basically states that they have implemented security practices, but that they are not responsible for any loss.

Link to Original Source

Just because he's dead is no reason to lay off work.

Working...