Comment: Dead On (Score 4, Insightful) 2008-07-16 05:03
Attached to: MSM Noticing That Patent Gridlock Stunts Innovation
Fucking dim wits spend their waking hours trying to steal more shit. You don't need to get caught, you are already a fucking dipshit and everyone knows it.
No he was not. As far as I can understand it he leaked material from the warez scene onto P2P.
Most (except probably a few unrespected crap groups) do not upload their material to P2P networks and don't want their material getting there. It is a security risk and it is exposing the scene.
These so called Uploaders on P2P torrent trackers are mostly people who have access to scene material in one way or another. Maybe just a crappy courier that isn't contributing or maybe someone who pays for leech or is hosting a server. Anyhow they are usually not respected individuals within the scene and upload things to P2P for either ideological reasons or just to get a bigger epenis.
Sorry for my rant but someone had to say it.
No, it'll just need to be paid for differently: by charging for the programmers' labor instead of charging for copies of the files they produce.
Oh, sure! Programmers are totally going to be able to make a livable wage off a product that isn't made first! Look at the fucking game market and see how realistic that is. Put down the bong first.
More like god damn the people who are too blind, or too attached to a broken business model, to realize that you don't need copyright to get paid for working. People in most other industries manage to get paid for their work without any special monopoly protections like copyright.
Because the people in other industries are producing physical objects. When your creation (and it is as manifest a creation as anything physical) is easily copied, the framework of copyright ensures that you as a creator get a fair shake.
But no, you quite plainly don't give a fuck about the rights of creators. You and your GNUtard friends (and keep in mind, I write open-source code) plainly don't give two shits about the rights of those who are actually making things.
(And you're utterly, factually wrong about businesses "doing the work once those customers have agreed to pay them for it." Never fucking heard of retail, dipshit? Software development's profit cycle is essentially retail, not service-based, because service-based doesn't work for mass-market software one fucking bit.)
Copy protection has been tried before - always with dubious result.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the Poster. The Rest © 1997-2008 SourceForge, Inc.